Article contents
Psychopathology arises from intertemporal bargaining as well as from emotional trauma
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2015
Abstract
The role of emotional trauma in psychopathology is limited. One additional mechanism is predictable from hyperbolic discounting: When a person uses willpower to control urges each success or failure takes on extra significance through recursive self-prediction, potentially motivating several constricting defense mechanisms. The need for eliciting emotion in psychotherapy is as the authors say it is, but their hypothesis about reconsolidation of memories adds no explanatory power.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
Ainslie, G. (1999) The dangers of willpower: A picoeconomic understanding of addiction and dissociation. In: Getting hooked: Rationality and addiction, ed. Elster, J. & Skog, O-J., pp. 65–92. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, G. (2005) Précis of Breakdown of will. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
28(5):635–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bickel, W. K. & Marsch, L. A. (2001) Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction
96:73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, M. E., Mineka, S. & Barlow, D. H. (2001) A modern learning theory perspective on the etiology of panic disorder. Psychological Review
108(1):4–32.Google Scholar
Corsini, R. J. & Wedding, D. (2011) Current psychotherapies, ninth edition. Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, H. H., Buss, K. A. & Lemery, K. S. (1997) Toddler and childhood temperament: Expanded content, stronger genetic evidence, new evidence for the importance of environment. Developmental Psychology
33:891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, D. W. (1986) Heredity and alcoholism. Annals of Behavioral Medicine
8:3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, L. & Myerson, J. (2004) A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin
130:769–92.Google Scholar
Gunderson, J. G. & Sabo, A. N. (1993) The phenomenological and conceptual interface between borderline personality disorder and PTSD. American Journal of Psychiatry
150:19–27.Google Scholar
Kirby, K. N. & Santiesteban, M. (2003) Concave utility, transaction costs, and risk in measuring discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
29(1):66–79.Google Scholar
Marlatt, G. A. & Gordon, J. R. (1980) Determinants of relapse: Implications for the maintenance of behavior change. In: Behavioral medicine: Changing health lifestyles, ed. Davidson, Park O. & Davidson, Sheena M., pp. 410–52. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Monterosso, J. R., Ainslie, G., Toppi-Mullen, P. & Gault, B. (2002) The fragility of cooperation: A false feedback study of a sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Economic Psychology
23(4):437–48.Google Scholar
Muris, P. (2006) The pathogenesis of childhood anxiety disorders: Considerations from a developmental psychopathology perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development
30(1):5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polivy, J. & Herman, C. P. (1985) Dieting and binging: A causal analysis. American Psychologist
40:193–201.Google Scholar
Poulton, R. & Menzies, R. G. (2002) Non-associative fear acquisition: A review of the evidence from retrospective and longitudinal research. Behaviour Research and Therapy
40:127–49.Google Scholar
Rachman, S. J. (1977) The conditioning theory of fear acquisition: A critical examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy
15:375–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Houtem, C. M. H. H., Laine, M. L., Boomsma, D. I., Lighart, L., van Wijk, A. J. & De Jongh, A. (2013) A review and meta-analysis of the heritability of specific phobia subtypes and corresponding fears. Journal of Anxiety Disorders
27:379–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenar, C. & Kerig, P. (2006) Developmental psychopathology: From infancy through adolescence. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by
Target article
Memory reconsolidation, emotional arousal, and the process of change in psychotherapy: New insights from brain science
Related commentaries (28)
A clinician's perspective on memory reconsolidation as the primary basis for psychotherapeutic change in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1
Changing maladaptive memories through reconsolidation: A role for sleep in psychotherapy?
Clinical applications of counterfactual thinking during memory reactivation
Deconstructing the process of change in cognitive behavioral therapy: An alternative approach focusing on the episodic retrieval mode
Disruption of reconsolidation processes is a balancing act – can it really account for change in psychotherapy?
Emotion regulation as a main mechanism of change in psychotherapy
Focus on emotion as a catalyst of memory updating during reconsolidation
How do we remember traumatic events? Exploring the role of neuromodulation
How does psychotherapy work? A case study in multilevel explanation
Let's be skeptical about reconsolidation and emotional arousal in therapy
Memory reconsolidation and psychotherapeutic process
Memory reconsolidation and self-reorganization
Memory reconsolidation keeps track of emotional changes, but what will explain the actual “processing”?
Memory reconsolidation, repeating, and working through: Science and culture in psychotherapeutic research and practice
Mental model construction, not just memory, is a central component of cognitive change in psychotherapy
Minding the findings: Let's not miss the message of memory reconsolidation research for psychotherapy
Multiple traces or Fuzzy Traces? Converging evidence for applications of modern cognitive theory to psychotherapy
Psychopathology arises from intertemporal bargaining as well as from emotional trauma
Reconsolidation or re-association?
Reconsolidation versus retrieval competition: Rival hypotheses to explain memory change in psychotherapy
Reconsolidation: Turning consciousness into memory
Social-psychological evidence for the effective updating of implicit attitudes1
The importance of the rites of passage in assigning semantic structures to autobiographical memory
The nature of the semantic/episodic memory distinction: A missing piece of the “working through” process
The relevance of maintaining and worsening processes in psychopathology
Therapeutic affect reduction, emotion regulation, and emotional memory reconsolidation: A neuroscientific quandary
Top-down versus bottom-up perspectives on clinically significant memory reconsolidation
Trade-offs between the accuracy and integrity of autobiographical narrative in memory reconsolidation
Author response
The integrated memory model: A new framework for understanding the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy