Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:29:32.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Star formation in mergers and interacting galaxies: gathering the fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Curtis Struck
Curtis Struck*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA email: curt@iastate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Selected results from recent studies of star formation in galaxies at different stages of interaction are reviewed. Recent results from the Spitzer Space Telescope are highlighted. Ideas on how large-scale driving of star formation in interacting galaxies might mesh with our understanding of star formation in isolated galaxies and small scale mechanisms within galaxies are considered. In particular, there is evidence that on small scales star formation is determined by the same thermal and turbulent processes in cool compressed clouds as in isolated galaxies. If so, this affirms the notion that the primary role of large-scale dynamics is to gather and compress the gas fuel. In gas-rich interactions this is generally done with increasing efficiency through the merger process.

Keywords

stars: formationgalaxies: interactinggalaxies: starburstgalaxies: individual (NGC 2207, Arp 82)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 2 , Symposium S237: Triggered Star Formation in a Turbulent ISM , August 2006 , pp. 317 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Appleton, P. N. et al. 2006, ApJ 639, L51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, N. et al. 2005, A&A 443, 79Google Scholar
Bekki, K., Shioya, Y. & Whiting, M. 2006, MNRAS 371, 805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitz, L. & Rosolowsky, E. 2004, ApJ 612, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushouse, H. A., Werner, M. W. & Lamb, S. A. 1988, ApJ 355, 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmandaris, V., Laurent, O., Mirabel, I. F. & Gallais, P. 2001, Ap Sp Sci Suppl 277, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmegreen, D. M. et al. 2006, ApJ 642, 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, M. et al. 2006, AJ submittedGoogle Scholar
Hinz, J. L. & Rieke 2006, ApJ 642, 872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P. F. et al. 2006, ApJS 163, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, et al. 1997, AJ 114, 2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. 1998, ApJ 498, 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, C. J., Farrah, D. & Smith, H. E. 2006, in: Mason, J.W. (eds.), Astrophysics Update 2 (Chichester: Springer, Praxis), p. 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolic, B., Cullen, H. & Alexander, P. 2004, MNRAS 355, 874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schombert, J. M., Wallin, J. F. & Struck-Marcell, C. 1990, AJ 114, 2323Google Scholar
Smith, B. J. et al. 2006, AJ submittedGoogle Scholar
Struck, C. 2006, in: Mason, J.W. (eds.), Astrophysics Update 2 (Chichester: Springer, Praxis), p. 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weedman, D. W. et al. 2005, ApJ 633, 706CrossRefGoogle Scholar