Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:58:04.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children's abstraction and generalization of English lexical stress patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

MELISSA A. REDFORD  and
GRACE E. OH
MELISSA A. REDFORD*
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
GRACE E. OH
Affiliation:
Konkuk University
*
Address for correspondence: Melissa Redford, Department of Linguistics, 1290 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1290, USA. e-mail: redford@uoregon.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current study investigated school-aged children's internalization of the distributional patterns of English lexical stress as a function of vocabulary size. Sixty children (5;3 to 8;3) participated in the study. The children were asked to blend two individually presented, equally stressed syllables to produce disyllabic nonwords with different resulting structures in one of two frame sentences. The frame sentences were designed to elicit either a noun or verb interpretation of the nonword. Children's receptive vocabulary was also assessed. The results indicated that children more readily blended syllable pairs that resulted in trochaic-compatible word structures than in iambic-compatible structures. This effect was strongest in young children with large vocabularies. As for stress placement, all children were sensitive to the effect of word structure, but only children with the largest vocabularies were sensitive to the biasing effect of grammatical category (noun = trochee; verb = iamb). The study results are discussed with reference to the observation that speech motor skills develop in tandem with lexical acquisition and the hypothesis that phonological knowledge emerges in part from abstraction across lexical representations.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 338 - 365
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, G. D. & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: definition and development. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child phonology. Vol. I: Production, 227–56. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R. & Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science 9, 321–4.Google Scholar
Ballard, K. J., Djaja, D., Arciuli, J., James, D. G. & van Doorn, J. (2012). Developmental trajectory for production of prosody: lexical stress contrastivity in children ages 3 to 7 years and in adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55, 1822–35.Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14, 150–77.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5·1·13) [Computer program]. Online:<http://www.praat.org/>..>Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clopper, C. G. (2002). Frequency of stress patterns in English: a computational analysis. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers 2, 1–9.Google Scholar
Curtin, S., Campbell, J. & Hufnagle, D. (2012). Mapping novel labels to actions: how the rhythm of words guides infants’ learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 112, 127–40.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language 2, 133–42.Google Scholar
Davis, B. L., MacNeilage, P. F., Matyear, C. L. & Powell, J. K. (2000). Prosodic correlates of stress in babbling: an acoustical study. Child Development 71, 1258–70.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Echols, C. H. & Newport, E. (1992). The role of stress and position in determining first words. Language Acquisition 2, 189–220.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E. & Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 421–36.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 59 (5, Serial No. 242).Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Perfors, A. & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology 42, 98–116.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Francis, W. & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., Emslie, H. & Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Phonological memory and vocabulary development during the early school years: a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 28, 887–98.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. A. (1994). The metrical template account of children's weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language 21, 565–84.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. A. (1996). Phonological and distributional information in syntax acquisition. In Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K. (eds), Signal to syntax: bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 411–25. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Goffman, L. & Malin, C. (1999). Metrical effects on speech movements in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, 1003–15.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1958). Speech production and the predictability of words in context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10, 96–106.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T. & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English nonwords include syllabic structure, lexical class and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech 46, 403–27.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1977). Tenseness, vowel shift, and the phonology of back vowels in Modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 611–25.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development 64, 675–87.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. (1998). Support for metrical stress theory in stress acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 12, 1–23.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997). The acquisition of prosodic structure: an investigation of current accounts of children's prosodic development. Language 73, 113–44.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2001). Development of syllable structure in English-speaking children with particular reference to rhymes. Journal of Child Language 28, 393–432.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M., Stoel-Gammon, C. & Buder, E. H. (1995). Acoustic correlates of stress in young children's speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 38, 338–50.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. H. & Bock, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 389–403.Google Scholar
Levitt, A. G. & Wang, Q. (1991). Evidence for language-specific rhythmic influences in the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Language and Speech 34, 235–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lounsbury, F. G. (1954). Transitional probability, linguistic structure and systems of habit –family hierarchies. In Osgood, C. E. & Sebeok, T. A. (eds), Psycholinguistics: a survey of theory and research problems, 93–101. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Luce, P. & Pisoni, D. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19, 1–36.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. & Johnson, A. (1997). Trochaic template use in early words and phrases. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40, 1220–31.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1985). Hungarian language acquisition as an exemplification of a general model of grammatical development. Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition 2, 1069–155.Google Scholar
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J. & Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29, 143–78.Google Scholar
Metsala, J. L. & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (eds), Word recognition in beginning literacy, 89–120. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Munson, B., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2005). Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munson, B., Kurtz, B. A. & Windsor, J. (2005). The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48, 1033–1047.Google Scholar
Paul, R. & Jennings, P. (1992). Phonological behavior in toddlers with slow expressive language development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 35, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollock, K., Brammer, D. & Hageman, C. (1993). An acoustic analysis of young children's productions of word stress. Journal of Phonetics 21, 183–203.Google Scholar
Pons, F. & Bosch, L. (2010). Stress pattern preference in Spanish-learning infants: the role of syllable weight. Infancy 15, 223–245.Google Scholar
Redford, M. A. & Miikkulainen, R. (2007). Rate effects on structure in a source-filter model of phonological development. Language 83, 737–769.Google Scholar
Rescorla, L. & Ratner, N. B. (1996). Phonetic profiles of typically developing and language-delayed toddlers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 39, 153–165.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274, 1926–1928.Google Scholar
Saxton, M. (2010). Child language: acquisition and development. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. G., Petinou, K., Goffman, L., Lazowski, G. & Cartusciello, C. (1996). Young children's production of syllable stress: an acoustic analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99, 3192–3200.Google Scholar
Sereno, J. & Jongman, A. (1995). Acoustic correlates of grammatical class. Language and Speech 38, 57–76.Google Scholar
Shport, I. A. & Redford, M. A. (2014). Interactions between lexical and phrasal prosody in school-aged children's speech. Journal of Child Language 41, 890–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language 38, 1–34.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Dale, P. (1988). Aspects of phonological development of linguistically precocious children. Paper presented at Child Phonology Conference, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.Google Scholar
Tardif, T., Gelman, S. A. & Xu, F. (1999). Putting the ‘noun bias’ in context: a comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development 70, 620–635.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turk, A. E., Jusczyk, P. W. & Gerken, L. (1995). Do English-learning infants use syllable weight to determine stress? Language and Speech 38, 143–158.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1996). Phonological development: the origins of language in the child. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., DePaolis, R. A. & Davis, B. L. (1998). Is there a ‘trochaic bias’ in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. Child Development 69, 935–949.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S. & DePaolis, R. A. (2006). Getting the rhythm right: a cross-linguistic study of segmental duration in babbling and first words. Laboratory Phonology 8, 341–366.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B. & Auer, E. T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language 68, 306–311.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K. M. & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants’ ability to learn phonetically similar words: effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy 3, 1–30.Google Scholar