Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T09:08:01.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Troubled Vernacular: Legibility and Presence in Indonesian Activist Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2015

Doreen Lee
Get access

Abstract

Activist art and political resistance became popular aesthetics in the work of Indonesian artists after the fall of the New Order in 1998. In subsequent years, more art alternatives have emerged in cities and small towns across Indonesia, including diverse and vernacular modes of artistry such as street art and community-based international festivals. Where artists formerly focused their energies on critiquing the state, present art initiatives have become far more diffuse, counter-establishment, and localized in their approach. Local artists started the Jogja mural movement to rebrand Yogyakarta as a city of murals, while Jatiwangi Art Factory, an arts collective founded in a semi-industrialized village in West Java, has become a haven for performance arts and community-based projects for Indonesians and foreign artists in residence. This article looks at such experiments of legibility and presence as a new means of redefining publics and broadening the domain of political participation in Indonesia.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , May 2015 , pp. 303 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Barry, Syamsul. 2008. Jalan seni jalanan Yogyakarta [The way of street art in Yogyakarta]. Yogyakarta: Studium.Google Scholar
Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. 1986. “On the Political Construction of Tradition: Gotong Royong in Indonesia.” Journal of Asian Studies 45(3):545–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crary, Jonathan. 1999. Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, J. Keri, and Robertson, Kirsty. 2011. “Introduction.” In Imagining Resistance: Visual Culture and Activism in Canada, eds. Cronin, J. Keri and Robertson, Kirsty. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Debord, Gilles. [1983] 2010. Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black & Red.Google Scholar
Deustche, Rosalyn. 1999. “The Question of Public Space.” American Photography Institute National Graduate Seminar Proceedings. New York: The Institute.Google Scholar
Ertanto, Bambang “Kirik.” 2003. “Frontier (dalam/dari) mural” [The frontier (in/of) murals]. Bernas, March 19.Google Scholar
Jain, Kajri. 2007. Gods in the Bazaar: The Economies of Indian Calendar Art. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Klinken, Gerry van, and Barker, Joshua, eds. 2009. State of Authority: State in Society in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Doreen. 2011. “Images of Youth: On the Iconography of History and Protest in Indonesia.” History and Anthropology 22(3):307–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Doreen. 2013. “‘Anybody Can Do It’: Aesthetic Empowerment, Urban Citizenship, and the Naturalization of Indonesian Graffiti and Street Art.” City and Society 25(3):304–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall, and Powers, Bruce. 1992. The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miklouho-Maklai, Brita L. 1991. Exposing Society's Wounds: Some Aspects of Contemporary Indonesian Art since 1966. Asian Studies Monograph no. 5. Adelaide: Flinders University.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics.” American Political Science Review 85(1):77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. 2005. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murti, Yoshi Fajar Kresno. 2007. “Praktek wacana dan spekulasi (ruang)” [The practice of discourse and (spatial) speculation]. Kode Pos 1:8–10.Google Scholar
Pinney, Christopher. 2004. Photos of the Gods: The Printed Image and Political Struggle in India. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Rath, Amanda K. 2005. Taboo and Transgression in Indonesian Contemporary Art. Ithaca, N.Y.: Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Richards, Colin. 2007. “Off the Wall: Mr. Peanut and Other Mod Icons.” In Pop Art and Vernacular Cultures, ed. Mercer, Kobena, 160–97. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Astri. 2000. “Thoughts from the Crest of a Breaking Wave.” In AWAS! Recent Art from Indonesia, eds. Kuss, Alexandra, Moon, Damon, Jaarsma, Mella, Hirota, Midori, and Wasmuth, Nele, 49–69. Yogyakarta: Cemeti Art Foundation.Google Scholar