Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T06:03:26.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The impact of exposure to pre-election polls on voting behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2015

Giancarlo Gasperoni*
Affiliation:
Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Department of political and Social Science, Bologna, Italy
Debora Mantovani*
Affiliation:
Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Department of political and Social Science, Bologna, Italy
Get access

Abstract

This article explores Italian voters’ perception of pre-election polls and the latter’s influence on voter choice. Approximately 900 voters were asked to participate in an online simulated election campaign implemented within the voting decision model developed by Richard Lau and David Redlawsk. Voters were given access to, among other heuristics, pre-election polls; a subset of voters was also exposed to polls predicting the final outcome. Findings concern voters’ perceptions of pre-election polls’ reliability and usefulness and the impact of polls on voters after they have viewed survey findings suggesting that their preferred candidates will lose. On the whole, voters participating in the simulated election campaign displayed somewhat negative attitudes towards pre-election polls: such polls, more often than not, were deemed useless and unreliable. As regards the part of the study in which some voters were forcibly exposed to polls that reported unfavourable predictions for their preferred candidates, only one-tenth of voters switched votes: not many, if one considers that such voters had a good incentive to switch, but often more than enough to decide an election.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Societá Italiana di Scienza Politica 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere, S. and Iyengar, S. (1994), ‘Of horseshoes and horse races: experimental studies of the impact of poll results on electoral behavior’, Political Communication 11: 413430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, G.F. (2005), The Illusion of Public Opinion: Facts and Artifacts in American Public Opinion Polls, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Broughton, D. (1995), Public Opinion Polling and Politics in Britain, London: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callegaro, M. and Gasperoni, G. (2008), ‘Accuracy of pre-election polls for the 2006 Italian parliamentary election: too close to call’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20: 148170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.S. and Johnson, E.J. (1990), Decision Research: A Field Guide, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ceri, P. (1997), ‘A Che Cosa Servono i Sondaggi Politici’, in P. Ceri (ed.), Politica e Sondaggi, Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier, pp. 273293.Google Scholar
Corbetta, P. and Gasperoni, G. (eds) (2007), I Sondaggi Politici nelle Democrazie Contemporanee, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Corbetta, P. and Colloca, P. (2013), ‘Uso delle Euristiche nella Scelta Elettorale: Un Approccio Basato sulla Simulazione della Decisione di Voto’, Quaderni dell’Osservatorio Elettorale 70: 530.Google Scholar
Corbetta, P. and Colloca, P.(2014), ‘Electoral choice: typology of processes’ underlying voters’ decisions’, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 43: 2954.Google Scholar
Crespi, I. (1989), Public Opinion, Polls, and Democracy, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Donsbach, W. (2001), Who’s Afraid of Election Polls? Normative and Empirical Arguments for the Freedom of Pre-Election Surveys, Amsterdam: Foundation for Information-Esomar.Google Scholar
Gasperoni, G (2013a), ‘La capacità predittiva dei sondaggi preelettorali pubblicati in occasione delle elezioni politiche italiane del 2013’, in I. Diamanti and L. Ceccarini (eds), Sondaggi ed Elezioni. Le Regole del Gioco e della Comunicazione, Firenze: Società Italiana di Studi Elettorali, pp. 222.Google Scholar
Gasperoni, G. (2013b), ‘A review of current issues and challenges in political opinion polling’, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 42: 277292.Google Scholar
Gasperoni, G. and Callegaro, M. (2007), ‘“Non cantare vittoria”. La Capacità Predittiva dei Sondaggi Preelettorali Pubblicati in Occasione delle Elezioni Politiche Italiane del 2001 e del 2006’, Polis 21: 463487.Google Scholar
Gasperoni, G. and Callegaro, M. (2008), ‘Un miglioramento immeritato? La capacità predittiva dei sondaggi preelettorali e le elezioni del 2008’, Polis 22: 483504.Google Scholar
Hardmeier, S. and Roth, H. (2003), ‘Die Erforschung der Wirkung politischer Meinungsumfragen: Lehren vom “Sonderfall” Schweiz’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 44: 174195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshel, R.L. and Johnston, W. (1987), ‘The emergence of band-wagon effects: a theory’, Sociological Quarterly 28: 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, G.A. and Van Holsteyn, J.J.M. (2002), ‘According to polls: the influence of opinion polls on expectations’, Public Opinion Quarterly 66: 92104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A.W., Thompson, E.P. and Spiegel, S. (1999), ‘Separate or equal? Bimodal notions of persuasion and a single-process unimodel’, in S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (eds), Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 293313.Google Scholar
Lau, R.R. and Redlawsk, D.P. (1997), ‘Voting correctly’, American Political Science Review 91: 585599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R.R. and Redlawsk, D.P. (2001), ‘Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making’, American Journal of Political Science 45: 951971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R.R. and Redlawsk, D.P. (2006), How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R.R. and Redlawsk, D.P.(2009), ‘Understanding individual decision making using process tracing’. Paper presented at the General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, September 10–12, Potsdam.Google Scholar
McAllister, I. and Studlar, D.T. (1991), ‘Bandwagon, underdog, or projection? Opinion polls and electoral choice in Britain, 1979-1987’, Journal of Politics 53: 720741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, A. (1998), ‘Effects of poll reports on voter preferences’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28: 21192130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morwitz, V.G. and Pluzinski, C. (1996), ‘Do polls reflect opinions or do opinions reflect polls? The impact of political polling on voters’ expectations, preferences, and behavior’, Journal of Consumer Research 23: 5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy, P. and Rinke, E.M. (2012), ‘Attitudinal and behavioural consequences of published opinion polls’, in C. Holtz-Bacha and J. Strömbäck (eds), Opinion Polls and the Media: Reflecting and Shaping Public Opinion, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 225245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, R., Cloutier, E. and Guay, J.H. (1993), ‘New evidence about the existence of a bandwagon effect in the opinion formation process’, International Political Science Review 14: 203213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984), The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion – Our Social Skin, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986), Communication and Persuasion, New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, V. (1992), Public Opinion, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redlawsk, D.P. (2004), ‘What voters do: information search during election campaigns’, Political Psychology 25: 595610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, S. and Roccato, M. (2013), ‘Does right-wing authoritarianism reduce fear? An experimental study’, in M.N. Purcella (ed.), Psychology of Fear: New Developments, New York, NY: Nova, pp. 6982.Google Scholar
Skalaban, A. (1988), ‘Do the polls influence elections? Some 1980 evidence’, Political Behavior 10: 136150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. (1954), ‘Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions’, Public Opinion Quarterly 18: 245253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Gasperoni and Mantovani Dataset

Link