Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T17:21:51.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iterative Methods of Richardson-Lucy-Type for Image Deblurring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

M. K. Khan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA
S. Morigi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Bologna, P.zza Porta San Donato 5, Bologna, Italy
L. Reichel*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242, USA
F. Sgallari*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics-CIRAM, University of Bologna, Via Saragozza 8, Bologna, Italy
*
Corresponding author.Email address:kazim@math.kent.edu
Corresponding author.Email address:serena.morigi@unibo.it
Corresponding author.Email address:reichel@math.kent.edu
Corresponding author.Email address:fiorella.sgallari@unibo.it
Get access

Abstract

Image deconvolution problems with a symmetric point-spread function arise in many areas of science and engineering. These problems often are solved by the Richardson-Lucy method, a nonlinear iterative method. We first show a convergence result for the Richardson-Lucy method. The proof sheds light on why the method may converge slowly. Subsequently, we describe an iterative active set method that imposes the same constraints on the computed solution as the Richardson-Lucy method. Computed examples show the latter method to yield better restorations than the Richardson-Lucy method and typically require less computational effort.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Al-Bakkar, A. G., Ipson, S. S., Porter, G. J. and Gleed, D. G., A parallel algorithm for a modified Richardson-Lucy algorithm for image de-blurring, Inter. J. Infrared Millimeter Waves, 18 (1997), pp. 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Ayers, G. R. and Dainty, J. C., Iterative blind deconvolution method and its applications, Opt. Lett., 1 (1988), pp. 547–549.Google Scholar
[3] Dey, N., Blanc-Feraud, L., Zimmer, C., Roux, P., Kam, Z., J.-Olivo-Marin, C. and Zerubia, J., Richardson-Lucy algorithm with total variation regularization for 3D confocal microsope decon-volution, Microsc. Res. Techniq., 69 (2006), pp. 260–266.Google Scholar
[4] Engl, H. W., Hanke, M. and Neubauer, A., Regularization of Inverse Problems, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1996.Google Scholar
[5] Fish, D. A., Brinicombe, A. M., Pike, E. R. and Walker, J. G., Blind deconvolution by means of the Richardson-Lucy algorithm, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 12 (1995), pp. 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Hansen, P. C., Regularization tools version 4.0 for Matlab 7.3, Numer. Algorithms, 46 (2007), pp. 189–194.Google Scholar
[7] Kindermann, S., Convergence analysis of minimization-based noise level-free parameter choice rules for linear ill-posed problems, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 38 (2011), pp. 233–257.Google Scholar
[8] Lucy, L. B., An iterative method for the rectification of observed distributions, Astronomical J., 79 (1974), pp. 745–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Morigi, S., Plemmons, R., Reichel, L. and Sgallari, F., A hybrid multilevel-active set method for large box-constrained linear discrete ill-posed problems, Calcolo, 48 (2011), pp. 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Morigi, S., Reichel, L., Sgallari, F. and Zama, F., An iterative method for linear discrete ill-posed problems with box constraints, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 198 (2007), pp. 505–520.Google Scholar
[11] Morigi, S., Reichel, L. and Sgallari, F., Noise-reducing cascadic multilevel methods for linear discrete ill-posed problems, Numer. Algorithms, 53 (2010), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
[12] Morigi, S., Reichel, L. and Sgallari, F., Cascadic multilevel methods for fast nonsymmetric blur-and noise-removal, Appl. Numer. Math., 60 (2010), pp. 378–396.Google Scholar
[13] Paige, C. C. and Saunders, M. A., LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 8 (1982), pp. 43–71.Google Scholar
[14] Perry, K. M. and Reeves, S. J., Generalized cross-validation as a stopping rule for the Richardson-Lucy algorithm, in The Restoration of HST Images and Spectra II Space Telescope Science Institute, eds. Hanisch, R. J. and White, R. L., 1994, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
[15] Richardson, W. H., Bayesian-based iterative method of image restoration, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 62 (1972), pp. 55–59.Google Scholar
[16] Ricort, G., Lant, H.ÉRI, Aristidi, E. and Aime, C., Application of the Richardson-Lucy algorithm to the deconvolution of two-fold probability density functions, Pure Appl. Opt., 2 (1993), pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
[17] Yu, D. P., Zhang, J. D., Cheng, V., Beling, C. D. and Fung, S., Doppler broadening of annihilation radiation spectroscopy study using Richardson-Lucy, maximum entropy, and Huber methods, Phys. Stat. Sol., 4 (2007), pp. 3997–4000.Google Scholar
[18] Zhang, J. D., Zhou, T. J., Cheung, C. K., Beling, C. D., Fung, S. and Ng, M. K., Deconvolution of 2D coincident Doppler broadening spectroscopy using the Richardson-Lucy algorithm, Nuclear Instr. Methods Phys. Res. A, 560 (2006), pp. 552–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Zhao, Z., Ding, Y., Dong, J., Hao, Y., Wu, S., Cao, L. and Pu, Y., Richardson-Lucy method for decoding x-ray ring code image, Plasma Phys. Control Fusion, 49 (2007), pp. 1145–1150.Google Scholar