Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:16:04.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE FAILURE RATE SHAPE FOR A MIXTURE OF TWO GAMMAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Henry W. Block
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh E-mail: hwb@stat.pitt.edu; tsavits@stat.pitt.edu
Thomas H. Savits
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh E-mail: hwb@stat.pitt.edu; tsavits@stat.pitt.edu
Naftali A. Langberg
Affiliation:
University of Haifa E-mail: naftalilan@gmail.com

Abstract

In this paper, we continue our investigation of the shape of the failure rate of a mixture of two densities. In our recent paper, Block, Langberg and Savits [2], we introduced a variation of Glaser's method in which we emphasized the role of the mixing parameter q. There we determined all possible shapes of the failure rate function for a mixture of one exponential and one gamma density. Here we classify all possible shapes for a mixture of two gamma densities having shape parameters b, c>0 and scale parameters λ, μ>0.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bar-Lev, S.K. & Letac, G. (2012). Increasing hazard rate of mixtures for natural exponential families. Advances in Applied Probability 44: 373390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Block, H.W., Langberg, N. & Savits, T.H. (2012). A Glaser twist: focus on the mixture parameters. Journal of Applied Probability 49: 11441155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Block, H.W., Langberg, N. & Savits, T.H. (2013). The failure rate shape for a mixture of two gammas: detailed proofs. Technical Report, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
4.Block, H.W., Li, Y. & Savits, T.H. (2003). Initial and final behavior of failure rate functions for mixtures and systems. Journal of Applied Probability 40: 721740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Esary, J.D., Marshall, A.W. & Proschan, F. (1970). Some reliability applications of the hazard transform. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 18: 849860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Glaser, R.E. (1980). Bathtub & related failure rate characterizations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75: 667672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Gupta, R.C. & Warren, R. (2001). Determination of change points of non-monotonic failure rates. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 30: 19031920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lai, C.-D. & Xie, M. (2006). Stochastic ageing and dependence for reliability, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
9.Marshall, A.W. & Olkin, I. (2007). Life distributions, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
10.Navarro, J., Guillamon, A. & Ruiz, M.C. (2009). Generalized mixtures in reliability modelling: applications to the construction of bathtub shaped hazard models and the study of systems. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 25(3): 323337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Navarro, J. & Hernandez, P.J. (2004). How to obtain bathtub-shaped failure rate models from normal mixtures. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 18: 511531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Savits, T.H. (2003). Preservation of generalized bathtub functions. Journals of Applied Probability 40: 112.Google Scholar
13.Wondmagegnehu, E.T., Navarro, J. & Hernandez, P.J. (2005). Bathtub shaped failure rates from mixtures: a practical point of view. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 54: 270275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar