Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:45:18.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Gatekeepers' Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

Maarja Luhiste
Maarja Luhiste*
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is difficult to overestimate the role candidate selection plays in determining the number of women in elected office. While an increasing amount of research has been dedicated to the impact political parties have on women's electoral representation (Caul 1999; Davidson-Schmich 2010; Kittilson 2006; Krook 2009, 2010; Matland and Studlar 1996; Murray, Krook, and Opello, 2012), the relationship between gender and candidate selection remains a relatively understudied area. Ashe and Stewart (2012) and Nieven (1998), however, provide empirical evidence that the majority of the variance in women's underrepresentation can be explained with demand-side factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 89 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashe, Jeanette, and Stewart, Kennedy. 2012. “Legislative Recruitment: Using Diagnostic Testing to Explain Underrepresentation.” Party Politics 18 (5): 687–707.Google Scholar
Berch, Neil. 2004. “Women Incumbents, Elite Bias, and Voter Response in the 1996 and 1998 U.S. House Elections.” Women & Politics 26 (1): 21–33.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, William J. 1968. “The Party Organization and its Activities.” In Approaches to the Study of Party Organization, ed. Crotty, William J.. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation, 2nd edition. Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2010. “Gender Quota Compliance and Contagion in the 2009 Bundestag Election.” German Politics & Society 28 (3): 133–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deber, Raisa B. 1982. “‘The Fault, Dear Brutus’: Women as Congressional Candidates in Pennsylvania.” Journal of Politics 44 (4): 463–79.Google Scholar
de Winter, Lieven, Bryder, Tom, Linch, Philip, Norris, Pippa, Chavel, Cecile, Wessels, Bernhard, Kielhorn Marsh, Micheal R., Sola, Giorgio, Gardella, Louisa, and Thomassen, Jacques. 1999. “European Candidates Study 1994.” GESIS Data Archive, doi:10.4232/1.3077.Google Scholar
Duverger, Michael. 1955. The Political Role of Women. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
European Election Study. 2010. Candidate Survey Data 2009. http://www.piredeu.eu (accessed February 1, 2012).Google Scholar
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. 2009. Second European Quality of Life Survey Overview. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2009/02/en/2/EF0902EN.pdf (accessed February 10, 2012).Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2007a. At-Risk-Of-Poverty Rate. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=t2020_50 (accessed February 10, 2012).Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2007b. Gender Pay Gap. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/product_details/dataset?p_product_code=TSDSC340 (accessed February 10, 2012).Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2009. Labor Force Eurostat Survey. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/employment_unemployment_lfs/data/main_tables (accessed February 10, 2012).Google Scholar
Farrell, David M., and Scully, Roger. 2005. “Electing the European Parliament: How Uniform Are ‘Uniform’ Electoral Systems?” Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (5): 969–84.Google Scholar
Farrell, David M., and Scully, Roger. 2010. “The European Parliament: One Parliament, Several Modes of Political Representation on the Ground?” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (1): 36–54.Google Scholar
Ford, Lyanne, and Dolan, Kathleen. 1999. “Women State Legislators: Three Decades of Gains in Representation and Diversity.” In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders? A Collection of Readings, ed. Whitaker, Lois Duke. Upper Sadler River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark. 2006. “European Elections and the European Voter.” In European Union: Power and Policy Making, 2nd edition, ed. Richardson, Jeremy. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, and Marsh, Michael. 1988. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gertzog, Irwin N., and Simard, M. Michele. 1981. “Women and ‘Hopeless’ Congressional Candidacies: Nomination Frequency, 1916–1978.” American Politics Quarterly 9 (4): 449–66.Google Scholar
Giebler, Heiko, and Wessels, Bernhard. 2010. “2009 European Election Candidate Study—Methodological Annex.” https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/file.asp?file=ZA5048_bq.pdf (accessed November 11, 2014).Google Scholar
Giebler, Heiko, Haus, Elmar, and Wessels, Bernhard. 2010. “2009 European Election Candidate Study—Codebook.” https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/file.asp?file=ZA5048_cod.pdf (accessed November 11, 2014).Google Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2006. “The Influence of Candidate Selection Methods on Legislatures and Legislators: Theoretical Propositions, Methodological Suggestions and Empirical Evidence.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 12 (3–4): 366–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Voerman, Gerrit. 2006. “Electoral Systems and Candidate Selection.” Acta Politica 41 (1): 146–62.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Marsh, Michael. 2011. “Second-Order Effects Plus Pan-European Political Swings: An Analysis of European Parliament Elections Across Time.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 4–15.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon, Marsh, Michael, and Vivyan, Nick. 2009. “Predict09.EU.” http://www.astrid-online.com/Documenti/Politica-i/Documenti/Burson-Marsteller_Predict09_07_04_09.pdf (accessed November 29, 2014).Google Scholar
Hogan, Robert E. 2001. “The Influence of State and District Conditions on the Representation of Women in U.S. State Legislatures.” American Politics Research 29 (4): 4–24.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization. 2008. LABORSTA. http://laborsta.ilo.org/STP/guest (accessed February 10, 2011).Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2008. Women in Parliaments. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm (accessed February 10, 2011).Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women: Evidence from Latin American Vanguard.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (1): 56–81.Google Scholar
Kantola, Johanna. 2009. “Women's Political Representation in the European Union.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 15 (4): 379–400.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments. Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. “Why Are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Norris, Pippa. 2014. “Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office.” Political Studies 62 (1): 2–20.Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Vol. 7 of Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 2005. “Enhancing Women's Political Participation: Legislative Recruitment and Electoral Systems.: In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. Karam, Azza and Ballington, Julie. Stockholm: IDEA.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Studlar, Donley T.. 1998. “Gender and the Electoral Opportunity Structure in the Canadian Provinces.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (1): 117–40.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.” The Journal of Politics 58 (3): 707–33.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow, Krook, Mona L., and Opello, Katherine A. R.. 2012. “Why Are Gender Quotas Adopted? Party Pragmatism and Parity in France.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 529–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieven, Daniel. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women & Politics 19 (2): 57–80.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1996. “Legislative Recruitment.” In Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. LeDuc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G., and Norris, Pippa. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2006. “Recruitment.” In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William J.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Franklin, Mark. 1997. “Social Representation.” European Journal of Political Research 32 (2): 185–210.Google Scholar
OSCE. 2009. “Elections to the European Parliament, 4-7 June 2009. OSCE/ODIHR Exploratory Mission Report.” http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/eu/36917 (accessed July 13, 2012).Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, and Kunovich, Sheri. 2003. “Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.” Social Forces 82 (1): 87–113.Google Scholar
Platenga, Janneke, Remery, Chantal, Figueiredo, Hugo, and Smith, Mark. 2009 . “Towards a European Union Gender Equality Index.” Journal of European Social Policy 19 (1): 19–33.Google Scholar
Quota Project. 2010. “Global Database of Quotas for Women.” http://www.quotaproject.org/ (accessed July 1, 2012).Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven Y.. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.” Party Politics 7 (3): 297–322.Google Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz, and Schmitt, Hermann. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44.Google Scholar
Renwick, Alan, and Pilet, Jean-Benoit. 2011. “The Personalization of Electoral Systems: Theory and European Evidence.” Presented at the General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 1999. “Women in the Legislature and Executives of the World: Knocking the Highest Glass Ceiling.” World Politics 51 (4): 547–72.Google Scholar
Ryan, Michelle K., Haslam, S. Alexander, and Kulich, Clara. 2010. “Politics and the Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Preferentially Selected to Contest Hard-to-Win Seats.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 34 (1): 56–64.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1997. “Political Career Paths and the European Parliament.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22 (2): 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., Valdini, Melody E., and Suominen, Kati. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 437–49.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric R.A.N., and Fox, Richard L.. 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili M., and Kang, Alice. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 338–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdini, Melody E. 2012. “A Deterrent to Diversity: The Conditional Effect of Electoral Rules on the Nomination of Women Candidates.” Electoral Studies 31 (4): 740–49.Google Scholar