Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:14:44.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Actor-Network Theory's Take on Archaeological Types: Becoming, Material Agency and Historical Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

Astrid Van Oyen*
Affiliation:
Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PH, UK Email: av360@cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Within the recent popularity of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) in material culture studies, scholars tend to lose sight of its origin in ethnography of laboratory work. In particular, ANT studies how scientific facts are constructed and stabilized in laboratories so that they become universally accepted, seemingly platonic, categories. This article returns to this initial insight and links it to the long-standing issue of archaeological types. Analysis of the practices of production, consumption and distribution of terra sigillata — Roman archaeology's most salient pottery type — shows how it became a category, how it was stabilized as such, and how this process imbued sigillata with specific agentic properties that allowed it to shape the range of possible actions in the past. By reframing platonic types as constructed categories, they can become active elements in our historical narratives.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)