Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-zrclq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T04:15:05.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Six Portraits of Political Ambition in Xenophon's Memorabilia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2014

LEWIS FALLIS
LEWIS FALLIS*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
*
Lewis Fallis is a Doctoral Candidate, The University of Texas at Austin (lewisfallis@gmail.com).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I claim that the Greek philosopher Xenophon, in the third book of his Memorabilia, catalogues six—and perhaps the six—essential and enduring forms of human ambition. Most treatments of ambition depict the phenomenon as monolithic; or, at best, as dichotomous. That is, ambition is understood as a single trait or passion shared by all ambitious people, its manifestations differing only according to circumstance; or, alternatively, as a trait or passion with one good (or high) form and one bad (or base) form. Little attention is paid to an enterprise of cataloguing various types of human beings as embodying distinct forms of ambition, forms which a political community must tolerate or encourage, channel or confront, in different ways. This enterprise is best carried out through the dialectical approach, in which the personality of a particular interlocutor emerges in light of, and in response to, Socratic scrutiny.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 109 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 79 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, Benjamin. 1989. “Neither Leaders Nor Followers: Citizenship Under Strong Democracy.” In Essays in Honor of James MacGregor Burns, eds. Beschloss, Michael R. and Cronin, Thomas E.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 164–72.Google Scholar
Danoff, Brian. 2010. Educating Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Danzig, Gabriel. 2005. “Review of Louis-André Dorion, Michele Bandini, Xénophon Mémorables. Tome 1. Introduction générale, Livre I.” Bryn Mawr Classical Review.Google Scholar
Dillery, John. “Xenophon, the Military Review, and Hellenistic Pompai.” In Xenophon and His World: Papers from a Conference Held in Liverpool in July 1999, eds. Tuplin and Azoulay. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 259–76.Google Scholar
Dorion, Louis-André. 2010. “The Straussian Exegesis of Xenophon.” In Xenophon [Oxford Readings in Classical Studies], ed. Gray, Vivienne J.. New York: Oxford University Press, 283–323.Google Scholar
Faulkner, Robert. 2007. The Case for Greatness: Honorable Ambition and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gera, Deborah Levine. 1993. Xenophon's Cyropaedia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Vivienne. 1998. The Framing of Socrates. Stuttgart: F. Steiner Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Vivienne. 2011. Xenophon's Mirror of Princes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Homer, trans. Richmond Lattimore. 2011. The Iliad of Homer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David M. 2003. “Xenophon's Socrates on Law and Justice.” Ancient Philosophy 23 (2): 255–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David M. 2012. “Strauss on Xenophon.” In Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry, eds. Hobden and Tuplin. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV, eds. Fiona Hobden and Christopher Tuplin, 123–60.Google Scholar
Kane, John, and Patapan, Haig. 2012. The Democratic Leader. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham. 2013. Political Writings and Speeches, ed. Ball, Terence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorch, Benajamin. 2010. “Xenophon's Socrates on Political Ambition and Political Philosophy.” Review of Politics 72: 206–7.Google Scholar
O’Connor, David K. 2011. “Xenophon and the Enviable Life of Socrates.” In The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, ed. Donald R. Morrison. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 48–74.Google Scholar
Plato. 1961. Platonis Opera, ed. John Burnet. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Publius (Hamilton, Madison, Jay). 2003. The Federalist Papers, ed. Clinton Rossiter. New York, NY: Signet Classics.Google Scholar
Ruderman, Richard S. 1997. “Democracy and the Problem of Statesmanship.” Review of Politics 59 (4): 757–87.Google Scholar
Ruscio, Kenneth Patrick. 2004. The Leadership Dilemma in Modern Democracy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Kirk. 2011. “Don't Blame Socrates.” Classical Philology 106 (4): 349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1972. Xenophon's Socrates. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thucydides, trans. Richard Crawley. 1998. History of the Peloponnesian War. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de, trans. Harvey Mansfield. 2000. Democracy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo, trans. Pevear and Volokhonsky. 2000. Anna Karenina. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Xenophon, trans. Wayne Ambler. 2001. The Education of Cyrus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Xenophon. 2013. Memorabilia, Oeconomicus, Symposium, Apology, revised by Jeffrey Henderson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Xenophon, trans. Robert Bartlett. 1996. Oeconomicus , in The Shorter Socratic Writings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Xenophon, trans. Amy Bonnette. 1994. Memorabilia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar