Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:47:08.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Health Security Demands a Strong International Health Regulations Treaty and Leadership From a Highly Resourced World Health Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Frederick M. Burkle Jr.
Frederick M. Burkle Jr.*
Affiliation:
Senior Fellow and Scientist, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Senior International Public Policy Scholar, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Frederick M. Burkle, Jr, MD, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, 14 Story Street, 2nd Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138 (e-mail: fburkle@hsph.harvard.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If the Ebola tragedy of West Africa has taught us anything, it should be that the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) Treaty, which gave unprecedented authority to the World Health Organization (WHO) to provide global public health security during public health emergencies of international concern, has fallen severely short of its original goal. After encouraging successes with the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) pandemic, the intent of the legally binding Treaty to improve the capacity of all countries to detect, assess, notify, and respond to public health threats has shamefully lapsed. Despite the granting of 2-year extensions in 2012 to countries to meet core surveillance and response requirements, less than 20% of countries have complied. Today it is not realistic to expect that these gaps will be solved or narrowed in the foreseeable future by the IHR or the WHO alone under current provisions. The unfortunate failures that culminated in an inadequate response to the Ebola epidemic in West Africa are multifactorial, including funding, staffing, and poor leadership decisions, but all are reversible. A rush by the Global Health Security Agenda partners to fill critical gaps in administrative and operational areas has been crucial in the short term, but questions remain as to the real priorities of the G20 as time elapses and critical gaps in public health protections and infrastructure take precedence over the economic and security needs of the developed world. The response from the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network and foreign medical teams to Ebola proved indispensable to global health security, but both deserve stronger strategic capacity support and institutional status under the WHO leadership granted by the IHR Treaty. Treaties are the most successful means the world has in preventing, preparing for, and controlling epidemics in an increasingly globalized world. Other options are not sustainable. Given the gravity of ongoing failed treaty management, the slow and incomplete process of reform, the magnitude and complexity of infectious disease outbreaks, and the rising severity of public health emergencies, a recommitment must be made to complete and restore the original mandates as a collaborative and coordinated global network responsibility, not one left to the actions of individual countries. The bottom line is that the global community can no longer tolerate an ineffectual and passive international response system. As such, this Treaty has the potential to become one of the most effective treaties for crisis response and risk reduction worldwide. Practitioners and health decision-makers worldwide must break their silence and advocate for a stronger Treaty and a return of WHO authority. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:568–580)

Keywords

World Health AssociationInternational Health Regulations TreatyEbolaepidemicspandemicsforeign medical teamsGOARNglobal health securityhumanitarian assistance
Type
Systematic Review
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 9 , Issue 5 , October 2015 , pp. 568 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Merianos, A, Peiris, M. International Health Regulations (2005). Lancet. 2005;366:1249-1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Burkle, FM Jr. War, refugees, migration, and public health: do infectious diseases matter? In: Apostolopoulos Y, Sonmez S, eds. Population Mobility and Infectious Disease. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007:159-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Price-Smith, AT. The Health of Nations: Infectious Disease, Environmental Change, and Their Effects on National Security and Development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2002:22-25.Google Scholar
4. Burkle, FM Jr, Greenough, PG. Impact of public health emergencies on modern disaster taxonomy, planning, and response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(3):192-199.Google Scholar
5. Mackenzie, JS, Drury, P, Arthur, RR, et al. The global outbreak alert and response network. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(9):1023-1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Bloomberg News. Deadly lessons from SARS spur global reaction to Bird Flu. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-04-08/deadly-lessons-from-sars-spur-global-reaction-to-bird-flu. Published April 9, 2013. Accessed January 4, 2015.Google Scholar
7. Garrett, L. The SARS Mystery. Newsday. http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/sarsmystery.html. Published May 10, 2003. Accessed January 4, 2015.Google Scholar
8. Eckholm, E. Experts say China has greatly underestimated virus cases. The International New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/16/international/asia/16CND-CHIN.html. Published April 16, 2003. Accessed January 4, 2015.Google Scholar
9. Burkle, FM. Operationalizing public health skills to resource poor settings: is this the Achilles heel in the Ebola epidemic campaign? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;Oct:7 1-3.Google ScholarPubMed
10. WHO. Checklist and Indicators for Monitoring Progress in the Development of IHR Core Competencies in States Parties. IHR Core Capacity Framework. International Health Regulations (2005). WHO/HSE/GCR/2013.2. April 2013. http://www.who.int/ihr/IHR_Monitoring_Framework_Checklist_and_Indicators.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2013.Google Scholar
11. Baker, MG, Fidler, DP. Global public health surveillance under new international health regulations. Emerg Infect Dis. July 10 2006. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/537748_print. Accessed August 10, 2009.Google Scholar
12. Katz, R. Use of revised international health regulations during influenza A (H1N1) epidemic, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;Aug: 1-15.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Suk, JE. Sound science and the new international health regulations. Global Health Governance. 2007 Fall;1(2). http://www.ghgj.org. Accessed August 10, 2009.Google Scholar
14. Fidler, DP, Gostin, LO. The new international health regulations: an historic development for international law and public health. J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Spring;34(1):85-94.Google Scholar
15. Fidler, DP. Legal Issues surrounding public health emergencies. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(Suppl 2):79-86.Google Scholar
16. Evans, A. Managing Scarcity: The Institutional Dimensions. Presentation at: DPA Non-Traditional Security Threats Program, Center on International Cooperation; August 25, 2009; New York. www.GlobalDashboard.org.Google Scholar
17. International Assistance and Response Policy Branch. Public Health Emergency website. http://www.phe.gov/about/OPP/dihs/Pages/policy.aspx. Accessed January 12, 2015.Google Scholar
18. DHS’s Coordinated Response to Ebola. Department of Homeland Security website. http://www.dhs.gov/ebola-response. Last published February 3, 2015. Accessed January 2, 2015.Google Scholar
19. Fidler, DP. Influenza virus samples, international law, and global health diplomacy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(1):88-94.Google Scholar
20. Gostin, LO. Ebola: towards an International Health Systems Fund. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):e49-e51.Google Scholar
21. Ebola: what lessons for the International Health Regulations? Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1321.Google Scholar
22. FACT SHEET: Global Health Security Agenda: Getting Ahead of the Curve on Epidemic Threats. The White House website. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/26/fact-sheet-global-health-security-agenda-getting-ahead-curve-epidemic-th. Accessed January 2, 2015.Google Scholar
23. Global Health Security Initiative. http://www.ghsi.ca/english/index.asp. Accessed January 3, 2015.Google Scholar
24. Feldbaum, H, Lee, K, Michaud, J. Global Health and Foreign Policy. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32(1):82-92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Lim, M. Global Health Security (Briefing presentation). Office of Global Affairs, US Department of Health & Human Services; January 23, 2015.Google Scholar
26. Executive Board, Special Session on Ebola. Ebola: Ending the current outbreak, strengthening global preparedness and ensuring WHO capacity to prepare for and respond to future large-scale outbreaks and emergencies with health consequences. Agenda Item 3. EBSS/3/CONF./1 REV.1. Geneva: WHO; 2015.Google Scholar
27. Gostin, LO, Hanfling, D. National preparedness for a catastrophic emergency: crisis standards of care. JAMA. 2009 Dec 2:302(21):2365-2366.Google Scholar
28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assessment of the epidemiologic capacity in state and territorial health departments–United States, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(43):1049-1051.Google Scholar
29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assessment of epidemiologic capacity in state and territorial health departments–United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(18):457-459.Google Scholar
30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assessment of epidemiology capacity in State Health Departments-United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(49):1373-1377.Google Scholar
31. Norton, I, von Schreeb, J, Aiken, P, et al. eds. Classification and Minimum Standards for Foreign Medical Teams in Sudden Onset Disasters. Geneva: WHO; 2013. http://www.who.int/hac/global_health_cluster/fmt_guidelines_september2013.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2015.Google Scholar
32. Inter-Agency Standing Committee, Global Health Cluster. Concept paper: foreign medical teams. http://www.who.int/hac/global_health_cluster/about/policy_strategy/fmt_concept_paper_16may11.pdf. May 17, 2011. Accessed June 26, 2011.Google Scholar
33. The Power of Treaties [editorial]. Nature. 2013;501:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Burkle, FM Jr, Egawa, S, MacIntyre, AG, et al. The 2015 Hyogo Framework for Action: cautious optimism. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(3):191-192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. WHO. Executive Board, Special Session on Ebola. IHR and Ebola. Provisional agenda item 3; Provisional agenda item 9.4. EB136/INF./7. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB136/B136_INF7-en.pdf. Published January 9, 2015. Accessed February 9, 2015.Google Scholar
36. WHO. Sixty-fourth World Health Assembly, Report of the Review Committee on the Functioning of the International Health Regulations (2005) in relation to pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005). Provisional agenda item 13.2. A64/10. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA64/A64_10-en.pdf. Published May 5, 2011. Accessed February 9, 2015.Google Scholar
37. WHO. Executive Board, Special Session on Ebola. Ensuring WHO’s capacity to prepare for and respond to future large-scale and sustained outbreaks and emergencies. Report by the Secretariat. Provisional agenda item 3; Provisional agenda item 9.4. EB136/49. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB136/B136_49-en.pdf. Published January 9, 2015. Accessed February 9, 2015.Google Scholar
38. Burkle, FM. The International Health Regulations Treaty: The Grand Experiment. Presentation to: Consortium of US and China interests in the IHR; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC; May 12, 2011.Google Scholar
39. Abromowitz, S. Ten things that anthropologists can do to fight the West Africa Ebola epidemic. Ebola Fieldnotes. Available at: http://somatosphere.net/2014/09/ten-things-that-anthropologists-can-do-to-fight-the-west-african-ebola-epidemic.html. Published September 26, 2014. Accessed November 21, 2014.Google Scholar
40. Burkle, FM Jr. Hyogo declaration and the cultural map of the world. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2014;8(4):280-282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Multihazard Mitigation Council. Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: An Independent Study to Assess the Future Savings From Mitigation Activities—Volume 1: Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Institute of Building Sciences; 2005.Google Scholar
42. Burkle, FM Jr. Pandering to ignorance on climate change: lessons from an investment strategist. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(4):1-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Grantham, J. Be persuasive. Be brave. Be arrested (if necessary). Nature. 2012;491(7424):303.Google Scholar
44. Fidler, DP. Developments involving SARS, international law, and infectious disease control at the Fifty-Sixth Meeting of the World Health Assembly. American Society of International Law Insights. 2003;8(14). http://www.asil.org/insights/volume/8/issue/14/developments-involving-sars-international-law-and-infectious-disease. Published June 13, 2003. Accessed February 9, 2015.Google Scholar