Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:27:41.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impanation, incarnation, and enabling externalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2014

JAMES M. ARCADI
JAMES M. ARCADI*
Affiliation:
Department of Religion and Theology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK e-mail: james.arcadi@gordon.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I articulate a real presence theory of the Eucharist that is coherent, attractive, and utilizes the resources of contemporary Christology. First, I review some of the recent analytic discussions of the metaphysics of the incarnation. From this, I distinguish two types of impanation, which I name Type-H and Type-S Impanation. I then expound Type-S Impanation utilizing the notion of enabling externalism. I raise two potential objections to this view, the responses to which allow me to highlight the incarnation-like coherence and attractiveness of this view as an exposition of the liturgical utterance ‘This is my body.’

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 75 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. M. (1991) ‘Aristotle and the sacrament of the altar: a crisis in medieval Aristotelianism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21, 195–249.Google Scholar
Adams, M. M. (1999) What Sort of Human Nature? Medieval Philosophy and the Systematics of Christology (Milwaukee WI: Marquette University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, M. M. (2006) Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Adams, M. M. (2010) Some Later Medieval Theories of the Eucharist: Thomas Aquinas, Giles of Rome, Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Arcadi, J. (2013) ‘A Theory of consecration: a philosophical exposition of a biblical phenomenon’, The Heythrop Journal, 54, 913–925.Google Scholar
Baber, H. E. (2013) ‘The real presence’, Religious Studies, 49, 19–33.Google Scholar
BCP (1662, 1979) Book of Common Prayer.Google Scholar
Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. (1998) ‘The extended mind’, Analysis, 58, 7–19.Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2010) ‘Memento's revenge: the extended mind, extended’, in Menary, Richard (ed.) The Extended Mind (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), 43–66.Google Scholar
Crisp, O. (2007) Divinity and Humanity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Crisp, O. (2009) God Incarnate (London: T&T Clark).Google Scholar
Crisp, O. (2011) Revisioning Christology Theology in the Reformed Tradition (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Cross, R. (2002) The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cross, R. (2008) ‘Some varieties of semantic externalism in Duns Scotus's cognitive psychology’, Vivarium, 46, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R. (2009) ‘Incarnation’, in Flint, Thomas and Rea, Michael (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 452–475.Google Scholar
Cross, R. (2011) ‘Vehicle externalism and the metaphysics of the incarnation: a medieval contribution’, in Marmodoro, & Hill, (2011), 186–204.Google Scholar
Davis, J. J. (2011) ‘How personal agents are located in space: implications for worship, Eucharist, and union with Christ’, Philosophia Christi, 13, 437–444.Google Scholar
Davis, S., Kendall, S., & O'Collins, G. (2004) The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Flint, T. (2011), ‘Should concretists part with mereological models of the incarnation?’, in Marmodoro, & Hill, (2011), 67–87.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2011) ‘Introduction’, in Marmodoro, & Hill, (2011), 1–19.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2012) ‘Aquinas and the unity of Christ: a defence of compositionalism’, International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 71, 117–135.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. (2010) ‘Varieties of externalism’, in Menary, R. (ed.) The Extended Mind (Cambridge MA: MIT Press), 101–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. (2009) ‘Identity and the composite Christ: an incarnational dilemma’, Religious Studies, 45, 167–186.Google Scholar
Leftow, B. (2011) ‘The humanity of God’, in Marmodoro, & Hill, (2011), 20–44.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. (2011) ‘The metaphysics of the Extended Mind in ontological entanglements’, in Marmodoro, & Hill, (2011), 205–227.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. & Hill, J. (2008) ‘Modeling the metaphysics of the incarnation’, Philosophy and Theology, 20, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. & Hill, J. (2010) ‘Composition models of the incarnation: unity and unifying relations’, Religious Studies, 46, 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. & Hill, J. (eds) (2011) The Metaphysics of the Incarnation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Merricks, T. (2007) ‘The Word made flesh: dualism, physicalism, and the incarnation’, in van Inwagen, Peter & Zimmerman, Dean (eds) Persons: Human and Divine (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 281–300.Google Scholar
Morris, T. (1986) The Logic of God Incarnate (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Osborne, T. (2002) ‘Faith, philosophy, and the nominalist background to Luther's defense of the real presence’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 63, 63–82.Google Scholar
Pawl, T. (2012) ‘Transubstantiation, tropes and truthmakers’, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 86, 71–96.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (1999) ‘On heresy, mind, and truth’, Faith and Philosophy, 16, 182–193.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. (2009) ‘The Eucharist: real presence and real absence’, in Flint, Thomas & Rea, Michael (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 512–539.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. (2013) ‘Omnipresence, multilocation, the real presence and time travel’, Journal of Analytic Theology, 1, 60–73.Google Scholar
Rea, M. (2011) ‘Hylomorphism and the incarnation’, in Marmodoro, & Hill, (2011), 134–152.Google Scholar
Rogers, K. (2013) ‘The incarnation as action composite’, Faith and Philosophy, 30, 251–270.Google Scholar
Sasse, H. (2003) This is my Body: Luther's Contention for the Real Presence in the Sacrament of the Altar (St. Louis MO: Concordia Publishing House).Google Scholar
Senor, T. (2007) ‘The compositional account of the incarnation’, Faith and Philosophy, 24, 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, E. (2002) ‘Aquinas’ metaphysics of the incarnation’, in Davis, et al. (2002), 197–220.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas (1264) Summa Contra Gentiles, O'Neil, Charles J. (tr.) (New York: Hanover House, 1955–1957).Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas (1274) Summa Theologica, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (ed. & tr.) (Westminster MD: Christian Classics, 1920).Google Scholar