Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:48:09.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Essential Elements of Effective Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): Agency Decision Making and the NEPA Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2014

Ronald E. Lamb
Ronald E. Lamb*
Affiliation:
Mount Airy, Maryland.
*
Address correspondence to: Ronald E. Lamb, 2503 Vance Drive, Mount Airy, MD; (phone) 202-255-4547; (e-mail) ronaldlamb@comcast.net.
Get access

Abstract

This article presents the findings of an online survey and interviews with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) professionals on their opinion on the essential and most important components of agency NEPA programs. A list of NEPA program components was developed based on a review of books, articles, and papers on ways to improve the NEPA process. Results of the online survey indicate that all of the listed elements are considered important for an agency NEPA program to be successful. No program element was ranked lower than 3 (“somewhat important”). The highest-ranked element (1, “critically important”) was senior management support for the NEPA process. Interviews with senior NEPA specialists confirmed that senior management support for the NEPA process was critical, and that other critical components flowed from that support. Senior managers were interpreted as being the agency’s senior NEPA manager or the senior manager at each facility, installation, or command. Education was most frequently identified as how agency NEPA staff could develop and maintain consistent senior management support for the NEPA process. The interview sample size was small, and further research could be conducted with other agency representatives to identify additional successful methods to develop consistent senior management support for the NEPA process.

Environmental Practice 16: 1–9 (2014)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 272 - 280
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Caldwell, L.K. 1998. The National Environmental Policy Act: An Agenda for the Future. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 209 pp.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L.K., Bartlett, R.V., and Keys, D.L., eds. 1982. A Study of Ways to Improve the Scientific Content and Methodology of Environmental Impact Analysis: Final Report to the National Science Foundation on Grant PRA-73-10014n. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, 453 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, R. 1997. NEPA: The Rational Approach to Change. In. Environmental Policy and NEPA: Past, Present, and Future, R. Clark and L. Canter, eds. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL, 15–23.Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 1997. January. NEPA, A Study of Its Effectiveness after Twenty-five Years. CEQ, Washington, DC, 60 pp. Available at http://www.blm.gov/or/regulations/files/nepa25fn.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 2005. 40 CFR 1500–1508. In. 40 CFR: Protection of the Environment. CEQ, Washington, DC, Available at https://ceq.doe.gov/ceq_regulations/regulations.htmlGoogle Scholar
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). N.d. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21). FHWA, Washington, DC. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/Google Scholar
Knowles, M.S. 1975. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. Prentice Hall/Cambridge, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 135 pp.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, M.J., and Smith, Z.A. 2008. The National Environmental Policy Act: Judicial Misconstruction, Legislative Indifference, and Executive Neglect. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, 193 pp.Google Scholar
Luther, L. 2006. February 8. The National Environmental Policy Act: Streamlining NEPA. Resources, Science, and Industry Division, Order Code RL33267. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, 39 pp. Available at http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL33267_20060208.pdfGoogle Scholar
Martin, D. 2012. September 7. Back to the Basics in NEPA—A Case Study on the U.S. Air Force’s Rapid Improvement Event (RIE) to Improve Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) through the Implementation of Preliminary Environmental Impact Analysis Process (PREIAP). Duke University Libraries, Durham, NC, 19 pp. Available at http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/5873Google Scholar
Survey Builder. 2009. Center for History and New Media, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
US Congress. 1970. January 1. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). US Congress, Washington, DC, 7 pp. Available at http://energy.gov/nepa/downloads/national-environmental-policy-act-1969.Google Scholar
Yost, N.C. 1979. January 19. Memorandum for NEPA Liaisons: Agency Implementing Procedures under CEQ’s NEPA Regulations. Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, 35 pp. Available at https://ceq.doe.gov/nepa/regs/exec11979.htmlGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

Caldwell, L.K. 1982. Science and the National Environmental Policy Act: Redirecting Policy through Procedural Reform. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, R., and Canter, L., eds. 1997. Environmental Policy and NEPA: Past, Present, and Future. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL, 339 pp.Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 2007. Memorandum to Heads of Executive Branch Departments and Agencies, Implementation Instructions and Requirements for Executive Order 13423. CEQ, Washington, DC, 53 pp. Available at http://www.fedcenter.gov/Documents/index.cfm?id=6825Google Scholar
Futrell, J.W., Reed, P., Arnold, N., Cohn-Needham, H., Entwisle, E., Henderson, T., and Parker, G.. 1981. NEPA in Action: Environmental Offices in Nineteen Federal Agencies, Environmental Law Institute Report to the CEQ. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 298 pp.Google Scholar
Gaines, L., and Lurie, S.. 2007. NEPA for the 21st Century: A Comparative Analysis of Other Organizations’ Environmental Review Structures—Final Report. Oregon State University, Institute for Natural Resources, Corvallis, 46 pp. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/about/programs/fsd/NEPA/Final%20Draft%20Report-160507.pdfGoogle Scholar
ICF International. 2008. Effective Project Management for NEPA. Prepared for American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ICF International, Fairfax, VA, 89 pp. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(27)_FR.pdfGoogle Scholar
Keys, D.L., Canter, L., and Senner, R. 2011. Strengthening the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Environmental Practice 13(3):216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEPA [National Environmental Policy Act] Task Force. 2003. September. Modernizing NEPA Implementation, Report to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). CEQ, Washington, DC, 132 pp. Available at https://ceq.doe.gov/ntf/report/finalreport.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office of the Federal Environmental Executive (OFEE). 2004. Environmental Management System: Managers Guide. OFEE, Washington, DC, 10 pp. Available at http://www.fedcenter.gov/_kd/Items/actions.cfm?action=Show&item_id=14583&destination=ShowItemGoogle Scholar
Richards, K., Seesholtz, D., Grice, J., Auer, M., Barbour, J., Fischer, B., Freitag, C., and McArdle, G.. 2007. September 20. Internal Organization and External Contracting for the NEPA Process: Lessons from New Institutional Economics and Strategic Organizational Design. White Paper prepared for USDA Forest Service. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, 49 pp. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/about/programs/fsd/NEPA/New%20Institutional%20Economic%20in%20FS%20NEPA.pdfGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. 1984. Making Bureaucracies Think: The Environmental Impact Statement Strategy of Administrative Reform. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 410 pp.Google Scholar
US Department of Energy (USDOE). 2004. DOE G 450.1-10: Senior Managers’ Implementation Guide for Use with DOE O 450.1, Environmental Protection Program. USDOE, Washington, DC, 10 pp. Available at https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives-documents/400-series/0450.1-EGuide-8Google Scholar