Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:22:45.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is there a benefit of bilingualism for executive functioning?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2014

RAYMOND M. KLEIN*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDalhousie Universityray.klein@dal.ca

Extract

Scholars and educators were once concerned that encouraging children to learn more than one language might have adverse cognitive consequences (Darcy, 1953). And for some linguistic capacities (e.g., fluency, vocabulary) this is often true (Bialystok, Craik & Luk, 2012). Unfortunately, such individual costs might discourage governmental policies that are aimed at fostering multi-lingualism, despite its widely acknowledged societal benefits. Peal & Lambert (1962) helped overcome this concern and through her “myth-dispelling” efforts and prodigious empirical output, Bialystok has pushed the pendulum of opinion in the opposite direction.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bialystock, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R. M., & Viswanathan, M. (2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290303 Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I.M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 240250. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 Google Scholar
Darcy, N. J. (1953). A review of the literature on the effects of bilingualism upon the measurement of intelligence. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 82, 2157.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hilchey, M. D. & Klein, R. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on non-linguistic interference tasks? Implications for plasticity of executive control processes, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 625658.Google Scholar
Hilchey, M. D., Saint-Aubin, J. & Klein, R. M. (in press). Does bilingual exercise enhance cognitive fitness in traditional non-linguistic executive processing tasks? In Schwieter, J. (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, R. M. (1999). The Hebb legacy. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53:1, 13 Google Scholar
Klein, R. M. & Taylor, , T. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In Dagenbach, D. & Carr, T. (Eds.) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory & language. Academic Press. (p. 113150)Google Scholar
Mindt, M. R., Arentoft, A. & Germano, K. K. (2008). Neuropsychological, cognitive and theoretical considerations for evaluation of bilingual individuals. Neuropsychology Review, 18, 255268.Google Scholar
Paap, K. R. (2014). The role of componential analysis, categorical hypothesising, replicability and confirmation bias in testing for bilingual advantages in executive functioning, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26:3, 242255, DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2014.891597 Google Scholar
Peal, E., & Lambert, W. E. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, R. W., Vu, K. P. L., & Pick, D. F. (2005). Aging and response selection in spatial choice tasks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47 (2), 250270.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (2014). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728914000522.Google Scholar