Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:17:36.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Lewis-Williams & David Pearce. Inside the Neolithic Mind: Consciousness, Cosmos and the Realm of Gods. 320 pages, 75 illustrations, 29 colour plates. 2005: London: Thames & Hudson; 0-500-05138-0 hardback £18.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Chris Scarre
Chris Scarre*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Durham University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Antiquity , Volume 81 , Issue 311 , 1 March 2007 , pp. 225 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, R. 1989. Deaths and entrances: a contextual analysis of megalithic art. Current Anthropology 30: 68–75.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2000. The Archaeology of Natural Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dronfield, J. 1995. Subjective vision and the source of Irish megalithic art. Antiquity 69: 539–49.Google Scholar
Dronfield, J. 1996. Entering alternative realities: cognition, art and architecture in Irish passage-tombs. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6: 37–72.Google Scholar
Helskog, K. 1999. The shore connection. Cognitive landscape and communication with rock carvings in northernmost Europe. Norwegian Archaeological Review 32: 73–94.Google Scholar
Patton, M. 1990. On entoptic images in context: art, monuments and society in Neolithic Brittany. Current Anthropology 31: 554–58.Google Scholar