Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T10:10:25.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG): origins, retrospect, prospect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Andrew Fleming  and
Matthew Johnson
Andrew Fleming
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield, Sheffield s10 2TN
Matthew Johnson
Affiliation:
St John's College, Cambridge CB2 1TP
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 64 , Issue 243 , June 1990 , pp. 303 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The time always comes when an enfant terrible has to grow up, although it may choose just to become middle-aged and terrible. The TAG conference, with its mission to keep the flame of theoretical archaeology alive, is coming into its middle years. It is established now, in its size, as a fixed point in the annual calendar of British archaeology, even perhaps as Establishment. Where has it come from, where will it go?

References

Atkinson, R.J.C. 1975. British prehistory and the radiocarbon revolution, Antiquity 49: 173–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, A.C. 1972. Common sense in archaeology, Antiquity 46: 301–4.Google Scholar