Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T04:13:22.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Salomon Reinach and the religious interpretation of Palaeolithic art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Eduardo Palacio-Pérez
Eduardo Palacio-Pérez*
Affiliation:
*The Cantabria International Institute for Prehistory Research (IIIPC), University of Cantabria, Edificio Interfacultativo s/n, 39005, Santander, Spain (Email: eduardo.palacio@unican.es)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When did upper Palaeolithic cave art come to be thought of as religious? The author shows an origin rooted in the intellectual movements of the later nineteenth century, and in particular in the personage and thought of Salomon Reinach.

Keywords

Palaeolithicuniversalismparticularismartreligion
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 84 , Issue 325 , September 2010 , pp. 853 - 863
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archiviste, L'. 1898. Drumont et Dreyfus: études sur la ‘Libre Parole’ de 1894 á 1895 (extrait). Paris: P. V. Stock.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G. 1992: Expecting the Spanish Inquisition: Altamira's rejection in its 19th-century context, in Goldsmith, S., Garvie, S., Selin, D. & Smith, J. (ed.) Ancient images, ancient thought: the archaeology of ideology. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary 1990: 339–46. Calgary: Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Barasch, M. 2000. Theories of art: from impressionism to Kandinsky. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baubérot, J. 2004. Secularisation et läčisation. Une trame décisive, in Pellistrandi, B. (ed.) L'histoire religieuse en France et en Espagne: 17–38. Madrid: Casa de Velázquez.Google Scholar
Bégouen, H. 1929. The magic origin of prehistoric art. Antiquity 3(9): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardin, R.J. 1876. Les archives et les monnaies préhistoriques. La Revue savoisienne, 17ème année: 11–13.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, P. 1993. La France aux Français. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, P. 1996. The Jews of the Republic: a political history of state Jews in France from Gambetta to Vichy. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. & Delaunay, abbé. 1865. Notice sur la Grotte de la Chaisse. Revue Archéologique 12: 90–4.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1952. Quatre cents siécles d'art pariétal. Montignac: Max Fourny.Google Scholar
Broca, P. 1866. Discours sur l'homme et les animaux. Bulletins de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 2ème série 1(1): 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartailhac, E. & Breuil, H.. 1903. Les peintures préhistoriques de la grotte d'Altamira à Santillane, Espagne. Paris: Alphonse Ricard et Fils.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, E. & Breuil, H.. 1906. La caverne d'Altamira à Santillane prés Santander (Espagne). Monaco: Imprimerie de Monaco.Google Scholar
Chauvet, G. 1903. Note sur l'art primitif. Angoulême: L. Coquemard et Cie.Google Scholar
Clottes, J. 2008. L'art des cavernes préhistoriques. Paris: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Clottes, J. & Lewis-Williams, D.. 1996. Les chamanes de la préhistoire. Transe et magie dans les grottes ornées. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
De Mortillet, G. 1883. Le Préhistorique, antiquité de l'homme. Paris: C. Renwald.Google Scholar
Delporte, H. 1989. Notas sobre el conocimiento de Altamira en Francia, in González Morales, M.R. (ed.) Cien años después de Sautuola: 159–71. Santander: Diputación Regional de Cantabria.Google Scholar
Díaz-andreu, M. 2007. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology. Nationalism, colonialism and the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G. 1890. The Golden Bough: a study in magic and religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Girod, P. & Massenat, E.. 1900. Les stations de l'Age du renne dans les vallées de la Vézère et de la Corrèze. Paris: J. B. Baillière et Fils.Google Scholar
González morales, M.R. & Moro Abadía, O.. 2002. 1902: el reconocimiento del arte rupestre paleolítico, in Torres, J. (ed.) Historica et Philologica: in honorem José María Robles: 211–28. Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar
González morales, M.R. & Moro Abadía, O..2004a. 1864-1902: el reconocimiento del arte paleolítico. Zephyrus 57: 119–35.Google Scholar
González morales, M.R. & Moro Abadía, O..2004b. Towards a genealogy of the concept of ‘Paleolithic mobiliary art’. Journal of Anthropological Research 60: 321–40.Google Scholar
Grosse, E. 1902. Les débuts de l'art. Paris: Félix Alcam.Google Scholar
Hirn, Y. 1900. The origins of art: a psychological and sociological inquiry. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kurtz, L.R. 1986. The politics of heresy: the modernist crisis in Roman Catholicism. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Laming-Emperaire, A. 1962. La signification de l'art rupestre paléolithique. Paris: A. & J. Picard.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964. Les religions de la préhistoire (Paléolithique). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1971. Préhistoire de l'art occidental. Paris: Lucien Mazenod.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, D. & Dowson, T.A.. 1988. The signs of all times. Entoptic phenomena in Upper Paleolithic art. Current Anthropology 29(2): 201–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubbock, J. [1870] 1987 (trans.) Los orígenes de la civilización y la condición primitiva del hombre. Barcelona: Alta Fulla.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. 1985. Émile Durkheim: his life and work. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Marrus, M. 1971. The politics of assimilation: a study of the French Jewish community at the time of the Dreyfus Affair. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mclennan, J.M. 1869–1870a. The worship of animals and plants. The Fortnightly Review 6: 407–582.Google Scholar
Mclennan, J.M. 1869–1870b. The worship of animals and plants. The Fortnightly Review 7: 194–216.Google Scholar
Moro Abadía, O. 2006. Art, crafts and Paleolithic art. Journal of Social Archaeology 6(1): 119–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro Abadía, O. & González Morales, M.R.. 2003. L'art bourgeois de la fin du XIXéme siécle face á l'art mobilier paléolithique. L'Anthropologie 107: 455–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, M. 1889. Natural religion. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Müller, M. 1891. Physical religion. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Müller, M. 1892. Anthropological religion. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Müller, M. 1893. Theosophy, or psychological religion. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Olender, M. 1989. Les langues du paradis: Aryens et Sémites, un couple providentiel. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Palacio-Pérez, E. 2010. Cave art and the theory of art: the origins of the religious interpretation of Palaeolithic graphic expression. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 29(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piette, E. 1873. La grotte de Gourdan, sur la lacune que plusieurs auteurs placent entre l'âge du renne et celui de la pierre polie, et sur l'art paléolithique dans ses rapports avec l'art gaulois. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris, 2ème série, 8: 384–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinach, S. 1889. Antiquités nationales, Tome I. Epoque des alluvions et des cavernes. Paris: Librairie de Firmin-Didot et Cie.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1892. L'origine des Aryens. Histoire d'une controverse. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1893. Le mirage oriental. L'Anthropologie 4: 539–78.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1899a. Paul Girop et Emile Massénat, les stations de l'âge du Renne dans les vallées de la Vézére et de la Corréze. Revue Archéologique, 3ème série 35: 476–8.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1899b. Les survivances du totémisme chez les anciens Celtes. Revue Celtique 21: 269–306.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1899c. Gabriel de Mortillet. Revue Historique, 24ème année 69: 67–95.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1900a. Quelques observations sur le tabou. L'Anthropologie 11: 401–407.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1900b. Phénoménes généraux du totémisme animal. Revue Scientifique, 4ème série 14: 449–57.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1900c. De l'origine des priéres pour les morts. Revue des Etudes Juives 41: 161–73.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1902a. Ernest Crawley. La rose mystique: étude sur le mariage primitif. L'Anthropologie 13: 533–41.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1902b. Emile Durckheim: sur le totémisme. L'Anthropologie 13: 664–9.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1903a. Gustave Chauvet: notes sur l'art primitif. Chronique des Arts et de la Curiosité, Année 1903: 47.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1903b. Gustave Chauvet: notes sur l'art primitif. Revue Archéologique, 4ème série 1: 290–91.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1903c. L'art et la magie. L'Anthropologie 14: 257–66.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1904. Apollo: histoire générale des arts plastiques. Paris: Librairie Hachette.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1905. Cultes, mythes et religions. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1909. Orpheus: histoire générale des religions. Paris: Alcide Picard.Google Scholar
Richard, N. 1993. De l'art ludique á l'art magique: interprétations de l'art pariétal au XIXéme siécle. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 30(1–2): 60–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigue, A. 2004. Totems, taboos, and Jews: Salomon Reinach and the politics of scholarship in Fin-de-Siécle France. Jewish Social Studies 10(2): 1–19.Google Scholar
Smith, W.R. 1889. Lectures on the religion of the Semites. Fundamental institutions. First Series. London: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Spencer, B. & Gillen, F.J.. 1899. The native tribes of central Australia. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strenki, I. 1997. Durkheim and the Jews of France. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strenki, I. 2006. Thinking about religion: an historical introduction to theories of religion. Malden (MA); Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Todorov, TZ. 1993. On human diversity: nationalism, racism, and exoticism in French thought. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tschannen, O. 1992. Les théories de la sécularitation. Genéve & Paris: Droz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, E.B. 1866. The religion of savages. The Fortnightly Review 6: 71–86.Google Scholar
Ucko, P. & Rosenfeld, A.. 1967. Arte Paleolítico. Madrid: Guadarrama.Google Scholar
Wilson, B.R. 1969. Religion in secular society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar