Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T09:01:15.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Figures, figurines and Colin Renfrew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Leo S. Klejn
Leo S. Klejn*
Affiliation:
*Retired Professor, St Petersburg University, Russia (Email: klejn@lk13534.spb.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Are modern artworks really comparable in any serious way to ancient monuments? Has Colin Renfrew changed sides in the conflict of reason with intuition in modern archaeology? Leo Klejn thinks so. Colin Renfrew responds, below.

Keywords

Theoryartprocessualismpost-modernismRichard Long
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 80 , Issue 310 , 1 December 2006 , pp. 980 - 984
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Klejn, L.S. 1996. My kromanyoncy. Dezataptacija cheloveka k sovremennoy kulture (We the Cro-Magnon people: The failure of human physiognomy to adapt to contemporary culture). Smysly kultury. International conference. Abstracts of papers. St Petersburg (Russia): 205–9.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 2003. Figuring it out: What are we? Where do we come from? The parallel visions of artists and archaeologists. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Lev, Samoylov (Klejn, L.S.). 1990. Etnografiya lagerya (Ethnography of a labour-camp). Sovetskaya Etnografiya (Moscow) 1: 96–108.Google Scholar