Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:41:14.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavating memories: archaeology and the Great War, 1914–2001

Part of: Conflict Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Nicholas J. Saunders
Nicholas J. Saunders*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England. nicholas.saunders@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The First World War is beginning to receive archaeological attention. This paper highlights the technical, ethical and political challenges, including recovery and re-burial of the multi-faith dead, excavation of battlefield features and volatile ordnance, and incorporating the sensitive management of multi-vocal landscapes as cultural heritage and tourist destinations.

Keywords

First World Warmemorycontested landscapesbattlefield archaeology
Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 76 , Issue 291 , March 2002 , pp. 101 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, F. 1991. La Sépulture collective de Saint-Rémy-la-Calonne, Quart-en-Réserve (Meuse). DRAG Lorraine: Service régional de l’Archéologie.Google Scholar
Ashplant, T. G., Dawson, G., & Roper, M. (ed.). 2000. The politics of war memory and commemoration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
BAR. 2001. Battlefield Archaeology, website. http://www.Wl.865.telia.com/~u86517080/ Battlefield Archaeology/ArkeologEng. htmlGoogle Scholar
Bender, B. (ed.). 1993. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Bostyn, F. 1999. Beecham Dugout, Passchendaele 1914–1918. Zonnebeke: Association for Battlefield Archaeology in Flanders. Studies 1.Google Scholar
Bostyn, F. & Vancoillie, J.. Bayernwald: Het Croonaertbos in de Forste Wereldoorlog. Zonnebeke: Association for Battlefield Archaeology in Flanders. Studies 2.Google Scholar
Brazier, J. 1998. Re-burial of 27 soldiers from 13th Bn Royal Fusi liers at Monchy-le-Preux, The Western Front Association Bulletin 50: 39.Google Scholar
Buckley, F. 1920–21. Finds of flint implements in the Red Line Trenches at Coigneux, 1918, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia: 1–9.Google Scholar
Carpenter, F. N. D. Francis Buckley, MA, BCL, JP, FSA. Unpublished Mss. Huddersfield: Tolson Memorial Museum.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C. 1997. Editorial, Antiquity 71: 505–9.Google Scholar
Clout, H. 1996. After the ruins: restoring the countryside of northern France after the Great War. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Desfossés, Y. 1999. Préserver les traces, in Historial de la Grande Guerre(ed.): 37–51.Google Scholar
Desfossés, Y. & Jacques, A.. 2000. Vers un définition et une reconnaissance de l’archéologie de la Première Guerre mondiale. Actes des colloques ‘La Bataille en Picardie, combattre de l’Antiquité au XXème siècle’: 203–20. Amiens.Google Scholar
Desfossés, Y., Jacques, A. & Prilaux, G.. 1999. Premières recherches de La Grande Guerre dans Le Nord Pas-deCalais, Archéologie 367: 32–42.Google Scholar
Dolamore, M. 2000. Ground penetrating radar and digital terrain modelling survey at the Canadian Memorial Parks at Vimy Ridge and Beaumont Hamel, France. Durand Group Report.Google Scholar
Doyle, P., Barton, P. & Rosenbaum, M.. 2001. Geohazards — last legacy of war? Geoscientist 11(1): 4–7.Google Scholar
Fabiansson, N. In preparation. The Internet and the Great War: The impact on the making and meaning of Great War history, in Saunders (ed.).Google Scholar
Greenfield, J. 1089. The return of cultural treasures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, O. 2000. Ghouls dig up bodies of our hero Tommies: trading on the sick black market, The Sun 11 November 2000: 6, 7.Google Scholar
Historial, de la Grande Guerre (ed.). 1999. I:Archéologie et la Grande Guerre 14–18 Aujourd’hui. Revue Annuelle d’Histoire 2.Google Scholar
Laffin, J. 1987. Battlefield archacolog)’. London: Ian Allan.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. W. 1998. Battlefield tourism: pilgrimage and the commémoration of the Great War in Britain. Australia and Canada, 1919–1939. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Liulevicius, V. G. 2000. War Land on the Eastern Front. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loxgworth, P. 1985. The unending vigil: a history of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission 1917–1984. London: Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
OVPW. 2001. Ocean Villas Project, website. http://www.timetravellers.orgGoogle Scholar
Piédalue, G. 1998. Bilan des interventions archéologiques réalisées au LHN de Beaumont-Hamel: synthèse préliminaire. Montreal.Google Scholar
Price, H. M. 1991. Disputing the dead: US law on Aboriginal remains and grave goods. Columbia (Ml): University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Price, J. In preparation. The ‘Ocean Villas’ Project: archaeology in the service of European remembrance, in Saunders (ed.).Google Scholar
Sage, A. & Evans, M.. 2001. ‘Grimsby Chums’ are found in war grave. The Times 20 June 2001.Google Scholar
Saunders, N. J. 2000. Bodies of metal, shells of memory: ‘Trench Art’ and die Great War re-cycled, journal of Material Culture 5(1): 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, N. J. 2001a. Apprehending memory: material culture and war, 1919–1939, in, Bourne, J., Liddle, P. H. & Whitehead, H. (ed.), The Great World War 1914–1945 2: 476–88. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Saunders, N. J. 2001b. Matter and memory in the landscapes of conflict: the Western Front 1914–1990, in Bender, B. & Winer, M. (ed.), Contested landscapes: movement, exile and place: 37–53. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Saunders, N. J. (Ed.). In preparation. Materialities of conflict: The Great War, 1914–2001. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1999. Une archéologic de la Grande Guerre, estelle possible?, in Historial de la Grande Guerre(ed.): 1927.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. Johnson, W. G. & Beck, C. (ed.). In press. Matériel culture: the archaeology of 20th century conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sercu, A. 2001. Official statement from ‘The Diggers’ concerning their activities and philosophy. Ms in author’s possession.Google Scholar
Shekman, D. J. 1999. The construction of memory in interwar France. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, T. 1999. Of Ypres battlefields — disappearance and discovery, The Western Front Association Bulletin 53: 38–9.Google Scholar
Spacnoly, T. 1998. The trenches at Auchonvillers (Somme), The Western Front Association Bulletin 52: 28.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A phenomenology of landscape. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tweedie, N. 2000. ‘Sacred’ battlefield still gives up its dead, Daily Telegraph 11 November 2000: 10.Google Scholar
Tyson, P. (prod.). 2000. Battlefield scavengers. Broadcast 12 November 2000. London Weekend Television.Google Scholar
Ucko, P. J. & Layton, R. (ed.). 1999. ‘The archaeology and anthropology of landscape. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
URW. 2001. An Unfortunate Region, website. http://www.ign.nl/users/vandenheuvelGoogle Scholar
Watkins, M. 1998. Technical investigation and neutralisation of the Durand Mine in the Canadian Memorial Park, Vimy Ridge, Artois, France 6–10 February 1998. Durand Group Report.Google Scholar
Webster, D. 1998. Aftermath: the remnants of war. New York (NY): Vintage.Google Scholar
Westhoek. 2001. The Diggers, website, http://www.westhoek.be/ diggersGoogle Scholar
Young, R. & Birkett, P.. 2000. Great War field hospital found by Arras gasmen, The Times 25 October 2000.Google Scholar