Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:54:32.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An approach to the study of ancient archery using mathematical modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

B. W. Kooi  and
C. A. Bergman
B. W. Kooi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, Free University, De Boelelaan 1087, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands. E-mail: kooi@bio.vu.nl
C. A. Bergman
Affiliation:
Northern Kentucky University & 3D Environmental Services, Inc., 781 Neeb Road, Cincinnati OH 45233-4625, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The archer's bow is a machine whose purpose is to impart stored energy effectively and accurately to propel the arrow. A mathematical modelling of different bow types shows how their engineering characteristics define their performances.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 71 , Issue 271 , March 1997 , pp. 124 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergman, C.A. 1993. The development of the bow in western Europe: a technological and functional perspective, in Peterkin, G.L., Bricker, H.M. & Mellars, P., Hunting and animal exploration in the Later Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Eurasier. 95–105. Washington (DC): Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 4.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D. 1963. Neolithic bows from Somerset, England and the prehistory of archery in north-western Europe, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 29: 50–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmer, R.P. 1952. Target archery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Faris, N.A. & Elmer, R.P.. 1945. Arab archery. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, I.E. 1978. Structures or why things don't fail down. Hannondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T.M. 1982. Native American bows. Columbia (MO): Missouri Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. 1992. Longbow. Sparkford, Somerset: Patrick Stephens.Google Scholar
Hickman, C.N., Nagler, F. & Klopsteg, P.E.. 1947. Archery: the technical side. Redlands (CA): National Field Archery Association.Google Scholar
Klopsteg, P.E. 1987. Turkish archery and the composite bow. Manchester: Simon Archery Foundation.Google Scholar
Kooi, B.W. 1981. On the mechanics of the bow and arrow, Journal of Engineering Mathematics 15:119–45.Google Scholar
Kooi, B.W. 1983. On the mechanics of the bow and arrow. Ph.D thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Kooi, B.W. 1991. On the mechanics of the modern working-recurve how, Computational Mechanics 8: 291–304.Google Scholar
Kooi, B.W. 1994. The design of the bow, Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 97(3): 1–27.Google Scholar
Kooi, B.W. & Sparenberg, I.A.. 1980. On the static deformation of a bow, Journal of Engineering Mathematics 14:27–45.Google Scholar
McEwen, E., Miller, R.L. & Bergman, C.A.. 1991. Early bow design and construction, Scientific American (June): 50–56).Google Scholar
Mcleod, W. 1970. Composite bows from the Tomb of Tut'ankhamün. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R.L., McEwen, E. & Bergman, C.A.. 1986. Experimental approaches to ancient Near Eastern archery, World Archaeology 18: 178–95.Google Scholar
Payne-Gallwey, R.. 1976. The crossbow. London: Holland Press.Google Scholar
Pope, S.T. 1974. Bows and arrows. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rausing, G. 1967. The bow. Lund: CWK Gleerups Förlag. Acta archaeologica Lundensia.Google Scholar
Rees, G. 1993. The longbow's deadly secrets, New Scientist (June 5): 24–5.Google Scholar
Tuijn, C. & Kooi, B.W.. 1992. The measurement of arrow velocities and the efficiency of working-recurve bows, European Journal of Physics 13: 127–34.Google Scholar