Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:13:04.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stephanie Moser. Ancestral images: the iconography of human origins. xxiv+200 pages, 10 colour plates & 103 b & w illustrations. 1998. Stroud: Sutton; 0-7509-1178-6 hardback £25 & Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; 0-8014-3549-8 hardback $39.95

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher Chippindale
Christopher Chippindale*
Affiliation:
Cambridge Unviersity Museum of Archaeology & Anthropology, cc43@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book reviews
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 280 , June 1999 , pp. 481 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baigrie, B. (ed.). 1996. Picturing knowledge: historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Copley, S. & Garside, P. (ed.). 1994. The politics of the picturesque: literature, landscape and aesthetics since 1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbey, R. & Tueunkssen, B. (ed.). 1995. Ape, man, apeman: changing views since 1600. Leiden: Department of Prehistory. Leiden University.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. & Daniels, S. (ed.). 1989. The iconography of landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. 1993. Utter antiquity: perceptions of prehistory in Renaissance England. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gifford-Gonzalez, D. 1993. You can hide, but you can’t run: representations of women’s work in illustrations of Palaeolithic: life, Visual Anthropology Review 9(1): 23–41.Google Scholar
Kemp, M. 1992. The science of art: optical themes in western art from Rrunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, R. 1988. In the age of mankind. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Books.Google Scholar
Molyneaux, B. (ed.). 1997, The cultural life of images. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moser, S, 1992. The visual language of archaeology: a case study of the Neanderthals, Antiquity 6Í5: 831–44.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1978, Antiquity depicted: aspects of archaeological illustration. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Roberts, K.B. & Tomlinson, J.D.W.. 1992. The fabric of the body: European traditions of anatomical illustration. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M.J.S. 1992. Scenes from deep time: early pictorial representations of the prehistoric world. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rykwert, J. 1981. On Adam’s house in Paradise: the idea of the primitive hut in architectural history. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smiles, S. 1994. The image of antiquity. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar