Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:46:36.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human skeletal remains from Tomb 1, Sipán (Lambayeque river valley, Peru); and their social implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John W. Verano
John W. Verano*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Tulane University, New Orleans LA 70118, USA. verano@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Moche tombs at Sipán, on the north Peruvian coast, are a major addition to our knowledge of high-status élite burial rituals. Its Tomb 1 contains the remains of nine individuals — three adult males, one adult female, three adolescent females and one child — besides the principal burial. Who are these people, as their biological remains instruct us?

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 71 , Issue 273 , September 1997 , pp. 670 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alva, W. 1988. Discovering the New World’s richest unlooted tomb, National Geographic 174(4):510–49.Google Scholar
Alva, W. 1994. Sipán. Lima: Cervecería Backus & Johnston.Google Scholar
Alva, W. & Donnan, C.B.. 1993. Royal Tombs of Sipán, Los Angeles (CA): Fowler Museum of Cultural History, University of California.Google Scholar
Barnes, E. 1994. Developmental defects of the axial skeleton in paleopathology. Niwot (CO): University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Bass, W.M. 1987. Human osteology: a laboratory and field manual of the human skeleton. 3rd edition. Columbia (MO): Missouri Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Boddington, A. 1987. Chaos, disturbance and decay in an Anglo-Saxon cemetery, in Boddington, et al. (ed.): 27–42.Google Scholar
Boddington, A., Garland, A.N., Janaway, R.C. (ed.). 1987. Death, decay and reconstruction: Approaches to archaeology and forensic science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. 1987. Decay and disorder in the york Jewbury skeletons, in Boddington, et al. (ed.): 22–6.Google Scholar
Dillehay, T.D. (ed.) 1995. Tombs for the living: Andean mortuary practices. Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
Donnan, C.B. 1995. Moche Funerary Practice, in Dillehay, (ed.): 111–60.Google Scholar
Donnan, C.B. & Mackey, C.J.. 1978. Ancient burial patterns of the moche valley, peru. Austin (TX): University of texas press.Google Scholar
Donnan, C.B. & Mcclelland, D.. 1979. The burial theme in moche iconography. Washington (DC): Dumbarton Oaks. Dumbarton Oaks Studies in Pre-Columbian Art & Archaeology 21.Google Scholar
Fawcitt, R.A., Jarvis, H. & Isherwood, I. 1984. X-raying the Manchester Mummies, in David, R. & Tapp, E. (ed.): Evidence embalmed: modern medicine and the mummies of ancient Egypt: 45–64. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Genoves, S. 1967. Proportionality of the long bones and their relation to stature among Mesoamericans, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 26: 67–77.Google Scholar
Krogman, W.M. & Işcan, M.Y. 1986. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd edition. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Largo Hoyle, R. 1945. Los Mochicas. Buenos Aires: Sociedad Geográfica Americana.Google Scholar
Lasker, G.W. 1962. Differences in anthropometric measurements within and between three communities in peru, Human Biology 34: 63–70.Google Scholar
Nelson, A. & Mackey, C.J.. 1997. Wandering bones: secondary burial in Moche times. Paper presented at the 37th annual meeting of the Institute of Andean Studies, Berkeley (CA), 11 January 1997.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. & Goodman, A.H. 1992. Anthropological uses of developmental defects of enamel, in Saunders, S.R. & Katzenberg, M.A. (ed.), Skeletal biology of past peoples: research methods: 53–174. New York (NY): Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar
Stewart, T.D. 1943. Skeletal remains with cultural associations from the Chicama, Moche, And Viru Valleys, Peru, Proceedings of the US National Museum 93: 153–85.Google Scholar
Ubbelohde-Doering, H. 1959. Bericht über archäologische Feldarbeiten in Peru, III, Ethnos 25: 153–82.Google Scholar
Ubbelohde-Doering, H. 1967. On the royal highways of the Inca. New York (NY): Praeger.Google Scholar
Ubelaker, D.H. 1989. Human skeletal remains: excavation, analysis, interpretation. 2nd edition. Washington (DC): Taraxacum.Google Scholar
Uceda, S. & Mujica, E. (Ed.). 1994. Moche: propuestas y perspectivas, Travaux de I’Institut Français d’Etudes Andines 79.Google Scholar
Verano, J.W. 1987. Cranial microvariation at pacatnamú: A study of cemetery population variability. Ann Arbor (MI): University Microfilms. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University Of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Verano, J.W. 1994a. Características físicas y biología osteológica de los Moche, in Uceda, & Mujica, (ed.): 307–26.Google Scholar
Verano, J.W. 1994b. Material osteológico recuperado por el proyecto ‘La Mina’, Valle de Jequetepeque: Informe Preliminar, in Uceda, & Mujica, (ed.): 83–4.Google Scholar
Verano, J.W. 1995 Where do they rest? The treatment of human offerings and trophies in ancient peru, in Dillehay, (ed.): 189–227.Google Scholar
Verano, J.W. 1997 Physical characteristics and skeletal biology of the Moche Population at pacatnamú, in Donnan, C.B. & Cock, G.A. (ed.): The Pacatnamú Papers 2: The Moche Occupation: 189–214. Los Angeles (CA): Fowler Museum of Cultural History.Google Scholar
Weiss, P. 1972. Las deformaciones cefálicas intencionales como factores de la arqueología, Actas y Memorias del XXXIX Congreso Internacional de Americanista 1: 165–80. Lima.Google Scholar