Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:37:38.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digging for ideas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

M. O. H. Carver
M. O. H. Carver*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York, Micklegate House, Micklegate, York YO1 1JZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An inaugural lecture is often the occasion to stand back from the specifics and the technicalities, to see the place of our subject in a larger order of things, and to look forward to its proper future. This is what Martin Carver, the second Professor of Archaeology in the University of York, looked at and saw in his inaugural last year.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 241 , December 1989 , pp. 666 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascheson, N. 1987. Observer, 8 November.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1987. Contextual archaeology, Antiquity 233: 468–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethell, P. & Miles, M.. 1987. Bulletin of Sutton Hoo Research Committee 5: 18–19.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1972. An archaeological perspective. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1985. Brand X versus the recommended product, American Antiquity 50(3): 580–90.Google Scholar
Carver, M.O.H. Forthcoming. On and off the Edda.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity 47: 6–18.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G. 1946. Idea of history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. 1985. The empiricist strikes back: reply to Binford, American Antiquity 50(3): 638–44.Google Scholar
Hewison, R. 1987. The heritage industry. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982a. Symbols in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982b. The present past. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.). 1983. Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. & Lane, P.. 1982. A contextual examination of neolithic axe distribution in Britain, in Ericson, J. & Earle, T. (ed.), Contexts of prehistoric exchange. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Leach, E. 1973. >Concluding address, in Renfrew, C. (ed.), The explanation of culture change: 761–71. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. 1985. The view from afar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D. 1985. The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merrifield, R. 1987. The archaeology of ritual and magic. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Patrick, L. 1985. Is there an archaeological record?, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 27–62.Google Scholar
Petrie, W.M.F. 1904. Methods and aims in archaeology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Plggott, S. 1965. Ancient Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1982. Towards an archaeology of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C.. 1987a. Reconstructing archaeology: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. 1987b. Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M. 1954. Archaeology from the earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar