Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:18:30.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transformation of a regional economy: sociopolitical evolution and the production of valuables in southern California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jeanne E. Arnold*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles CA 90024, USA

Extract

Among the most complex and specialized hunter-gatherer-fisher societies in the New World, the peoples of the Santa Barbara Channel region of California were considered exceptional by early explorers because of their intense interest in valuables, beads and trade. During the last several centuries before European contact, sedentary populations on the offshore islands and mainland coast participated in an intensive regional exchange network that emerged from important earlier developments in transportation, craft specialization and labour organization. Especially significant in the sociopolitical evolution of this region were changes in the manipulation of domestic labour by a rising elite, expressed through increasing control over the production and distribution of status-rich valuables and critical resources. At historic contact, the Chumash who occupied the mainland coast and the northern Channel Islands (FIGURE 1) were probably organized into several interlinked small chiefdoms.

Type
Special section
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, J.E. 1985. Economic specialization in prehistory: methods of documenting the rise of lithic craft specialization, in Vehik, S.C. (ed.), Lithic resource procurement: proceedings from the Second Conference on Prehistoric Chert Exploi-tation: 3758. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University. Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper 4.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. 1987a. Craft specialization in the prehistoric Channel Islands, California. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. 1987b. Technology and economy: microblade core production from the Channel Islands, in Johnson, J.K. & Morrow, C.A. (ed.), The organization of core technology: 207–37. Boulder (CO): West-view Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. 1988. An analysis of emergent complexity in the prehistoric Channel Islands, California. Proposal to the National Science Foundation (BNS 8812184).Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. 1990. An archaeological perspective on the historic settlement pattern on Santa Cruz Island, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 12(1): 112–27.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. In press (a). Lithic resource control and economic change in the Santa Barbara Channel region. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 12(2).Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. In press (b). Complex hunter-gatherer-fishers of prehistoric California: chiefs, specialists, and maritime adapatations of the Channel Islands, American Antiquity 57(1).Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. In press (c). Cultural disruption and the political economy in Channel Islands prehistory, in Jones, T.L. (ed.), Essays on the prehistory of maritime California. Davis (CA): Center for Archaeological Research at Davis, no. 10.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E. & Tissot, B.. n.d. Marine temperature cycles in prehistoric California middens: indications from differential growth rates of the black abalone. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bean, L.J. & Blackburn, T.C. (ed.). 1976. Native Californians: a theoretical retrospective. Socorro (NM): Ballena Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, T.C. 1975. December’s child: a book of Chumash oral narratives collected by J.P. Harrington. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, T.C. 1976. Ceremonial integration and social interaction in aboriginal California, in Bean & Blackburn: 225–43.Google Scholar
Brown, A.K. 1967. The aboriginal population of the Santa Barbara Channel. Berkeley (CA): University of California Archaeological Survey. Report 69.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E.M. & Earle, T.K. 1987. Specialization, exchange, and complex societies: an introduction, in Brumfiel, E.M. & Earle, T.K. (ed.), Specialization, exchange, and complex societies: 19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, P.W. 1988. El Nino-Southern Oscillation 1982-1983: nearshore population, community, and ecosystem responses, Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 19: 309–45.Google Scholar
HALSTEAD, P. & O’SHEA, J. 1982. A friend in need is a friend indeed: social storage and the origins of social ranking, in Renfrew, C. & Shennan, S. (ed.), flanking, resource and exchange: 92–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, J.P. 1942. Cultural element distributions XIX: Central California coast. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. Anthropological Records 7(1).Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 1990. Nimrods, piscators, pluckers, and planters: the emergence of food production, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9: 3169.Google Scholar
Hudson, T. & Blackburn, T.C. 1987. The material culture of the Chumash interaction sphere V: Manufacturing processes, metrology and trade. Menlo park (CA): Ballena Press. Anthropological Papers 31.Google Scholar
Hudson, T., Blackburn, T. Curletti, R. & Tim-BROOK, J. 1977. The eye of the flute: Chumash traditional history and ritual as told by Fernando Librado Kitsepawit to John P. Harrington. Santa Barbara (CA): Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Hudson, T., Timbrook, J. & Rempe, M. (ed.). 1978. Tomol: Chumash watercraft as described in the ethnographic notes of John P. Harrington. Socorro (NM): Ballena Press. Anthropological Papers 9.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.R. 1982. An ethnohistoric study of the Island Chumash. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.R. 1988. Chumash social organization: an ethnohistoric perspective. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
King, C. 1976. Chumash inter-village economic exchange, in Bean & Blackburn 1976: 288318.Google Scholar
King, C. 1981. The evolution of Chumash society: a comparative study of artifacts used in social system maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel region before AD 1804. Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Davis. Ann Arbor (MI): University Microfilms.Google Scholar
King, L.B. 1969. The Medea Creek cemetery (LAn-243) : an investigation of social organization from mortuary practices, University of California, Los Angeles, Archaeological Survey Annual Report 11: 2768.Google Scholar
King, L.B. 1982. Medea Creek cemetery: Late Inland Chumash patterns of social organization, exchange and warfare. Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Ann Arbor (MI): University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Martz, P.C. 1984. Social dimensions of Chumash mortuary populations in the Santa Monica Mountains region. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
Pisias, N.J. 1978. Paleoceanography of the Santa Barbara Basin during the last 8000 years, Quaternary Research 10: 366–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, T.D. & Brown, J.A. (ed.). 1985. Prehistoric hunter-gatherers: the emergence of cultural complexity. Orlando (FL): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Soutar, A. & Isaacs, J.D. 1969. History of fish populations inferred from fish scales in anaerobic sediments off California, California Marine Research Communications, CalCOFI 13: 6370.Google Scholar
Tegner, M.J. & Dayton, P.K. 1987. El Niň;o effects on southern California kelp forest communities, Advances in Ecological Research 17: 243–79.Google Scholar
Walker, P.L. 1986. Porotic hyperostosis in a marine dependent California Indian population, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 69: 345–54.Google Scholar