Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T12:42:22.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Trundholm horse's trappings: a chamfrein?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Paul Ashbee
Paul Ashbee*
Affiliation:
The Old Rectory, Chedgrave, Norwich NR14 6ND
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 240 , September 1989 , pp. 539 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.K. 1961. Ancient Greek horsemanship. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R.J.C. & Piggott, S.. 1955. The Torrs chamfrein, Archaeologia 96, 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, J. 1981. Domesticated animals from early times. London: British Museum (Natural History.Google Scholar
Coles, J.M. & A.F., Harding. 1979. The Bronze Age in Europe. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Curle, J. 1911. A Roman frontier post: the fort at Newstead. Glasgow: James Maclehose.Google Scholar
Davis, S.J.M. 1987. The archaeology of animals. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Forssander, J.E. 1936. Der Ostskandinavische Norden während der Ältesten Metalizeit Europas. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Gelling, P. & H.E Davidson, . 1969. The chariot of the sun. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Glob, P.V. 1974. The mound people. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Grinsell, L.V. 1942. Kivik Cairn, Scania, Antiquity 16: 160–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoernes, M. & O., MENGHIN. 1925. Urgeschichte der Bildenden Kunst in Europa. Wien: Anton Schroll.Google Scholar
Jaeckel, P. 1965. Pergamenische Waffenreliefs, Zeitschrift für Historische Waffenkunde 7: 94–123.Google Scholar
Jettmar, K. 1967. Art of the steppes. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Larsen, K.A. 1955. Solvogn og Solkult, Kuml 5: 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorimer, H.L. 1950. Homer and the monuments. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Menghin, W. 1980. Kelten, Römer und Germanen. München: Prestel.Google Scholar
Menghin, W. & Schauer, P.. 1983. Der Goldkegel von Ezelsdorf. Nürnberg: Germanisches Nationalmuseum.Google Scholar
MÜLLER, S. 1903. Solbilledet fra Trundholm, Nord-iske Fortidsminder 1 (6): 303–25.Google Scholar
Nationalmuseet, . 1978. Prehistoric Denmark. Copenhagen: National Museum.Google Scholar
Neustupny, J. et al. 1960. Pravek Cechoslovenska. Prague: Nakl Orbis.Google Scholar
Piesker, H. 1958. Untersuchungen zur älteren Lüneburgischen Bronzezeit. Lüneburg: Landesmuseum.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1983. The earliest wheeled transport. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Powell, T.G.E. 1953. The gold ornament from Mold, Flintshire, north Wales, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 19: 161–79.Google Scholar
1966. Prehistoric art, London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
1980. The Celts. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Rudenko, S.I. 1970. Frozen tombs of Siberia. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Russell Robinson, H. 1975. The armour of Imperial Rome. London: Arms & Armour Press.Google Scholar
Sandars, N.K. 1968. Prehistoric art in Europe. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Schubart, H. 1958. Nordische Bronzezeit in der DDR, Ausgrabungen und Funde 3: 210–21.Google Scholar
Shetelig, H., Falk, H. & Gordon, E.V.. 1937. Scandinavian archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thrane, H. 1962. The earliest bronze vessels in Denmark’s Bronze Age, Acta Archaeologica 33: 109–63.Google Scholar
Vigneron, P. 1968. Le Cheval dans l’antiquité Gréco-Romaine. Nancy: University of Nancy, Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines.Google Scholar