Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T08:25:51.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engendering archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Sandra E. Øvrevik*
Affiliation:
Senter for humanistisk kvinneforskning, Universitet i Bergen, Hermann Fossgt. 12, N-5000 Bergen, Norway

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertelsen, R., Lillehammer, G. & Njess, J.R. (ed.). 1987. Were they all men? An examination of sex roles in prehistoric society. Stavanger: Stavanger Arkeologisk Museum. AmS-Varia 17.Google Scholar
Bowles, G. & Klein, R.D. (ed.). 1983. Theories of women’s studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cockburn, C. 1990. Men’s power in organizations: ‘equal opportunities intervenes’, in Hearn, J. & Morgan, D., Men, masculinities and social theory: 7289. London: Unwyn Hyman.Google Scholar
Gero, J. 1985. Socio-politics and the Woman-at-Home ideology, American Antiquity 50(2): 34250.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1986. The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. 1987 (ed.). Feminism and methodology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Øvrevik, S.E. 1991. Sex ratios in archaeological organizations in Norway. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, M.Z. & Lamphere, L. (ed.). 1974. Women, culture and society. Sanford (CA): Sanford University Press.Google Scholar
Spender, D. 1980. Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar