Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:04:08.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Pleistocene settlement of South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Robert G. Bednarik
Robert G. Bednarik*
Affiliation:
Australian Rock Art Research Association, PO Box 216, Caulfield South, Victoria 3162, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Australia and the Americas provide the two case-studies of the late human settlement of a continent by, it seems, Homo sapiens sapiens. At one time the corollaries of first occupation of the Americas, at perhaps 12,000 b.p., were a similarly late settlement of Australia and the need for a land-bridge across the Bering Straits. But now the pattern of occupation in New Guinea and its offshore islands proves that a long sea-crossing was made there before about 40,000 b.p. Here an Australian researcher looks across the Pacific to the evidence that has been offered for a Pleistocene occupation in south America, of a date comparable with that in Sahul.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 63 , Issue 238 , March 1989 , pp. 101 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bednarik, R.G. 1984a. The nature of psychograms, The Artefact 8: 27–32.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1984b. Die Bedeutung der paläolithischen Fingerlinientradition, Anthropologie 23: 73–9.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1986. Reply to comments on ‘Parietal finger markings in Europe and Australia’, Rock Art Research 3: 162–9.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1987a. No pictographs at end of Rochester Creek rainbow, La Pintura 15(2 + 3): 14–17.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1987b. Engramme und Phosphene, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 112: 223–35.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1987c. El arte rupestre Boliviano visto desde el exterior, SIARB Boletín 2: 22–8.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1987d. Comment on J. Steinbring, E. Danziger & R. Callaghan, ‘Middle Archaic petroglyphs in northern North America’, Rock Art Research 4: 159–60.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1988a. Comment on J.D. Lewis-Williams & T.A. Dowson, ‘The signs of all times’, Current Anthropology 29: 218–19.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1988b. Art origins. Paper presented in Symposium K, First AURA Congress, Darwin, 2 September 1988.Google Scholar
Bowdler, S. 1977. The coastal colonization of Australia, in Allen, J., Golson, J. & Jones, R. (ed.), Sunda and Sahul: 205–46. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bray, W. 1988. The Palaeoindian debate, Nature 332: 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillehay, T.D. 1981. Early man in south central Andes: Monte Verde, Union Internacional de Ciencias Prehistoricas y Protohistoricas, Xo Congreso, El poblamento de America: 58–61. Commission XII, Mexico.Google Scholar
Dillehay, T.D. 1984. Late Ice-Age settlement in southern Chile, Scientific American 251: 100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillehay, T.D. 1988. How new is the New World? Antiquity 62: 94–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillehay, T.D. & Collins, M.B.. 1988. Early cultural evidence from Monte Verde in Chile, Nature 332: 150–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, J. 1983. Archaeology of the Dreamtime. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Groube, L., Chappell, J., Muke, J. & Price, D.. 1986. A 40,000 year-old human occupation site at Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea, Nature 324: 453–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruhn, R. 1988. Linguistic evidence in support of the coastal route of earliest entry into the New World, Man 23: 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidon, N. 1975a. Peintures rupestres de Várzea Grande, Piauí, Brésil, Cahiers d’Archéologie d’Amérique du Sud 3. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. 1975b. Abris peints de la Serra de Capivara, région de Varze Grande, État du Piauí, Brésil. Paris: Institut d’Ethnologie. URA 5.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. 1981. Dataçöes pelo Cl4 de sítios arqueológicos em São Raimundo Nonato, sudeste do Piauí (Brasil), Clio 4: 35–7.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. 1984a. Les premières occupations humaines de l’aire archéologique de São Raimundo Nonato - Piauí - Brésil, L’Anthropologie 88: 263–71.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. 1984b. L’art rupestre du sud-est du Piauí dans le contexte sud-américain. Une première proposition concernant méthodes et terminologie. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Université de Paris I.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. 1985. A arte pré-histórica da área arqueológica de São Raimundo Nonato: síntese de dez anos de pesquisas, Clio 7: 3–80.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. 1986. A sequencia cultural da área de São Raimundo Nonato, Piauí, Clio 8: 137–44.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. & Andreatta, M.D.. 1980. O sítio arqueológico Toca do Sítio do Meio (Piauí), Clio 3: 7–29.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. & Delibrias, G.. 1985. Inventaire des sites sud-américains antérieurs à 12,000 ans, L’Anthropoiogie 89: 385–407.Google Scholar
Guidon, N. & Delibrias, G.. 1986. Carbon-14 dates point to man in the Americas 32,000 years ago, Nature 321: 769–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maranca, S. 1983. Näveis e categorias com vistas à uma classificação preliminar de abrigos com arte rupestre, Revista do Museu Paulista n.s. 29: 201–13.Google Scholar
Silva Rocha, J. 1984. A indústria lítica em três sítios arqueológicos do sudeste do Piauí (nota prévia), Clio 6: 113–26.Google Scholar
Steinbring, J. 1987. Rock art site classification, La Pintura 14(1): 8–9.Google Scholar