Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:40:05.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why teach Heisenberg to archaeologists?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

A. M. Pollard
A. M. Pollard*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The archaeological department at the University of Bradford is the only one in Britain to be called a Department of Archaeological Sciences. Its Professor–whose own background was in physics and then chemistry before archaeology–explores the relationship of archaeology to the sciences in a contribution adapted from his talk given at Harvard University on Science and archaeology.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 69 , Issue 263 , June 1995 , pp. 242 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, M.J. 1982. Archaeometry does not only serve archaeology, in Olin, J.S. (ed.), Future Directions in Archaeometry: 61: Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1943. Archaeology as a science, Nature 152: 22–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Atley, S.P. & Bishop, R.L. 1991. Toward an integrated interface for archaeology and archaeometry, in Bishop, R.L. & Lange, F.W. (ed.), The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard: 358–80. Boulder (CO): University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R.C. 1993. Why archaeologists don’t care about archaeometry, Archeomaterials 7: 161–5.Google Scholar
Embree, L. 1987. Archaeology: the most basic science of all, Antiquity 61: 75–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrels, R.M. & Christ, C.L. 1965. Solutions, minerals anti equilibria. San Francisco (CA): Freeman, Cooper.Google Scholar
Hedges, R.E.M. Forthcoming. Bones and groundwater: towards the modelling of diagenctic processes. in Second Oxford workshop on bone diagenesis, 12–14, July 1993, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W.L. 1979. Chemical equilibria in soils. New York (NY): Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Pate, F.D. & Hutton, J.T. 1988. The use of soil chemistry data to address post-mortem diagenesis in bone mineral, Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 729–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pate, F.D., Hutton, J.T. & Norrish, K. 1989. Ionic exchange between soil solution and bone: toward a predictive model, Applied Geochemistry 4: 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pate, F.D., Hutton, J.T., Gould, R.A. & Pretty, G.L. 1991. Alterations of in vivo dietary signatures in archaeological bone: evidence from the Roonka Flat Dune, South Australia, Archaeologia Oceanin 26: 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, A.M. Forthcoming. Groundwater geochemical modelling in archaeology: the need and the potential, in Science and site: evaluotion and conservation, 8–10 September 1993, Bournemouth University.Google Scholar
Sensabaugh, G.F. 1986. Forensic science research: Who does it and where is it going?, in Davies, G. (ed.), Forensic science: 129–40. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Smith, C.S. 1982. Measurement and history, in Olin, J.S. (ed.), Future Directions in Archaeometry: 49–51. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1991. Science versus anti-science?, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 10: 27–37. Google Scholar
Thomas, R.G. 1990. Studies of archaeological copper corrosion phenomena. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, School of Chemistry and Applied Chemistry, University of Wales College of Cardiff.Google Scholar
Williams, C.T. 1988. Alteration of chemical composition of fossil bones by soil processes and groundwater, in Grupe, G. & Herrmann, B. (ed.), Trace elements in environmentnl history: 27–40. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar