Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:14:28.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tocqueville on the Modern Moral Situation: Democracy and the Decline of Devotion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2014

DANA JALBERT STAUFFER*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin
*
Dana Jalbert Stauffer is Lecturer and Research Fellow, The University of Texas at Austin (danastauffer@austin.utexas.edu)

Abstract

Most scholarship on the moral dimensions of Tocqueville's analysis of democracy focuses on the doctrine of enlightened self-interest. Surprisingly little has been written about his account of the underlying moral shift that makes this doctrine necessary. Drawing principally on Volume II of DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, but also on Tocqueville's letters and notes, I unearth his fascinating and compelling account of why modern democratic man loses his admiration for devotion and embraces self-interest. That account begins from individualism, but also includes democratic man's intellectual and aesthetic tastes, his low estimation of his moral capacities, and weakening religious belief. After examining what Tocqueville saw as the causes of the new moral outlook, I consider what he saw as its most profound implications. Departing from recent trends in Tocqueville scholarship, I argue that is in Tocqueville's account of the modern democratic condition as such that he has the most to offer us today.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anastaplo, George. 1991. “On the Central Doctrine of ‘Democracy in America.’” In Interpreting Tocqueville's Democracy in America, ed. Masugi, Ken. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 425–61.Google Scholar
Atanassow, Ewa, and Boyd, Richard. 2013. Editors’ introduction. In Tocqueville and the Frontiers of Democracy, eds. Atanassow, Ewa and Boyd, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 130.Google Scholar
Avramenko, Richard. 2011. Courage: The Politics of Life and Limb. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Derek. 2011. “From Associations to Organizations: Tocqueville, NGOs, and the Colonization of Civic Leadership.” In Alexis de Tocqueville and the Art of Democratic Statesmanship, eds. Danoff, Brian and Hebert, L. Joseph Jr. New York: Lexington, 205–23.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger. 1987. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha, and Katznelson, Ira. 2012. Anxieties of Democracy: Tocquevillian Thoughts on India and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cliteur, Paul. 2007. “A Secular Reading of Alexis de Tocqueville.” In Reading Tocqueville: From Oracle to Actor, eds. Geenens, Raf and De Dijn, Annelien. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 112–31.Google Scholar
Danoff, Brian. 2010. Educating Democracy: Alexis de Tocqueville and Leadership in America. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Deneen, Patrick J. 2005. Democratic Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gannett, Robert T. 2003. Tocqueville Unveiled: The Historian and His Sources for The Old Regime and the Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geenens, Raf and De Dijn, Annelien. 2007. Editors’ introduction. In Reading Tocqueville: From Oracle to Actor, eds. Geenens, Raf and De Dijn, Annelien. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, L. Joseph Jr. 2010. More than Kings and Less than Men: Tocqueville on the Promise and Perils of Democratic Individualism. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. 2011. “The Avatars of Religion in Tocqueville.” In Crediting God: Sovereignty and Religion in the Age of Global Capitalism, ed. Vatter, Miguel. New York: Fordham University Press, 273–84.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. 2013. Tocqueville: The Aristocratic Sources of Liberty, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, Alan S. 2013. Alexis de Tocqueville. New York: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Sanford. 1989. “Tocqueville on Sexual Morality.” Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy 16: 465480.Google Scholar
Kessler, Sanford. 1994. Tocqueville's Civil Religion: American Christianity and the Prospects for Freedom. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Koritansky, John C. 1986. Alexis de Tocqueville and the New Science of Politics: An Interpretation of Democracy in America. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon. R. 2002. Liberalism with Honor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lawler, Peter Augustine. 1993. The Restless Mind: Tocqueville on the Origin and Perpetuation of Human Liberty. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. 1996. Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy. Trans. Waggoner, John. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. 2010. Tocqueville: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xviilxxxvi.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C., and Winthrop, Delba. 2000. Editors’ introduction. In Democracy in America, by Alexis de Tocqueville, eds. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mélonio, Françoise. 1993. Tocqueville et le Français. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Joshua. 1995. The Fragility of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Joshua. 2013. “Tocquevillian Thoughts on Higher Education in the Middle East.” In Tocqueville and the Frontiers of Democracy, eds. Atanassow, Ewa and Boyd, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133–50.Google Scholar
Morton, F. L. 1984. “Sexual Morality and the Family in Tocqueville's ‘Democracy in America.’Canadian Journal of Political Science 17: 309324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negro, Dalmacio. 1992. “Virtue and Politics in Tocqueville.” In Liberty, Equality, Democracy, ed. Nolla, Eduardo. New York: New York University Press, 5574.Google Scholar
Orwell, George. 2009. Politics and the English Language and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford City Press.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul A. 2009. Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville and the Modern Prospect. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schleifer, James T. 2000. The Making of Tocqueville's Democracy in America. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Siedentop, Larry. 2007. “Tocqueville, European Integration and Free Moeurs.” In Reading Tocqueville: From Oracle to Actor, eds. Geenens, Raf and De Dijn, Annelien. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 143–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. Flagg IV. 2011. “Montesquieu, Tocqueville, and the Politics of Mores.” In Alexis de Tocqueville and the Art of Democratic Statesmanship, eds. Danoff, Brian and Hebert, L. Joseph Jr., New York: Lexington, 93116.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1861. Memoirs, Letters, and Other Remains of Alexis de Tocqueville, ed. de Beaumont, Gustav. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. 1959. The European Revolution and Correspondence with Gobineau, ed. Lukacs, John. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1970. Oeuvres Complètes, vol. XI. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1983. Oeuvres Complètes, vol. XI. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1985. Selected Letters on Politics and Society, ed. Boesche, Roger. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1998. The Old Regime and the French Revolution, eds. Furet, François and Mélonio, Françoise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2010. De La Démocratie en Amérique, or Democracy in America, Historical-Critical Edition, ed. Nolla, Eduardo. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana. 2005. “Hegel, Tocqueville, and Individualism.” Review of Politics 67: 659686.Google Scholar
Williamson, Thad. 2011. “Changing the People, Not Simply the President: The Limits and Possibilities of the Obama Presidency, in Tocquevillian Perspective.” In Alexis de Tocqueville and the Art of Democratic Statesmanship, eds. Danoff, Brian and Hebert, L. Joseph Jr. New York: Lexington, 155–78.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 2001. Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zetterbaum, Marvin. 1967. Tocqueville and the Problem of Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Catherine. 1992. “The Role of Religion in Preserving American Liberty—Tocqueville's Analysis 150 Years Later.” In Liberty, Equality, Democracy, ed. Nolla, Eduardo. New York: New York University Press, 2136.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Catherine. 1976. “American Women and Democratic Morals: ‘The Bostonians.’Feminist Studies 3: 3050.Google Scholar