Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:52:03.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can Humankind Deliberate on a Global Scale? Alfarabi and the Politics of the Inhabited World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2014

ALEXANDER I. ORWIN*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
*
Alexander I. Orwin is Doctoral Candidate, Committee on Social Thought, University of Chicago (niwro1@gmail.com).

Abstract

Alfarabi treats the question of global governance more thoroughly than any of his Greek predecessors. The key to understanding his view of the matter lies with his highly selective use of the term “inhabited world” across several works. Citing the inhabited world's enormous size, immeasurable diversity, and frequently inhospitable terrain, Alfarabi rejects the possibility that its entirety will ever be governed politically. Furthermore, Alfarabi omits the term “inhabited world” from his most important accounts of deliberation and legislation. The implication is that in Alfarabi's view no statesman or prophet can ever deliberate about, or legislate for, the whole of the inhabited world. The scope and multiplicity of the political accidents occurring within this vast domain are too great for any deliberator or group of deliberators to adequately grasp. The consequence is that any given political action or piece of legislation concerns at most several nations. Alfarabi's discussion helps to reveal the limited scope of most political decisions today, which often appear to be global but in fact do not involve more than several nations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1968. Kitāb al-millah wa nuṣūṣ ukhra. Ed. Mahdi, Muhsin. Bayrūt: Dār al-Mashriq (in Arabic).Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1968. -The Enumeration of the Sciences (Iḥsā’ al-ulūm). Ed. Othman Amin. Maktabet al-Anjlu-al-Misriyya. Cairo.Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1967. The Great Book on Music (Kitāb al-mūsīqa al-kabīr). Cairo: Dār al-Kātib al-‘Arabi lil-Ṭabā‘ah wa-al-Nashr.Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1971. Deux outrages inédits sur la réthorique. Eds. J Langhade et M. Grignaschi. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1981. Taḥṣīl al-sa‘āda. Ed. al-Yāsīn, Ja‘afir. Bayrūt: Dār al-Andalūs (in Arabic).Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 2004. Book of Letters (Kitāb al-ḥurūf). Ed. Mahdi, Muhsin. Bayrūt: Dār Al-Mashriq (in Arabic only). (Cited as BL. A partial English translation is available in Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings. 2005. Ed. Muhammad Ali Khalidi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–26. Section numbers are the same).Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1985. Trans. Richard Walzer. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Facing Arabic and English translation. The work is better known as the “Virtuous City” and has been cited as such.Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1986. Fusūl al-muntaza‘a. Ed. Fawzi M. Najjar. Bayrūt: Dār al-Mashriq; Alfarabi on the Perfect State. (Kitāb mabādi‘ arā’ ahl al-madīna al-fāḍila) (in Arabic). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 1993. Kitāb al-siyāsa al-madaniyya. Bayrūt: Dār Al-Mashriq (in Arabic).Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 2001. “Attainment of Happiness.” The Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle. Trans. Muhsin Mahdi. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1250.Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 2001a. Alfarabi: The Political Writings. Trans. Charles Butterworth. Contains Book of Religion, Selected Aphorisms, Chapter Five of the Enumeration of the Sciences, and the Harmonization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alfarabi, Abu Nasr. 2011. “Political Regime.” Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Eds. Parens, Joshua and MacFarland, Joseph C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Butterwoth, Charles. 1990. “When is War Justified: War and the Well-Ordered Regime.” In Crescent, Cross, and Sword: The Justification and Limitation of War in Western and Islamic Tradition. Ed. Johnson, James Turner and Kelsay, John. New York: Greenwood Press, 79100.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2006. “The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice.” Justice and Global Politics. Eds. Frank, Ellen Paul, Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, Miriam. 1990. Politics and Excellence: The Political Philosophy of Alfarabi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heck, Paul L. 2008. “ Milla in al-Fārābī and the Brethren of Purity.” In the Age of al-Fārābī: Arabic Philosophy in the Fourth/Tenth Century. Ed. Adamson, Peter. London: Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. 1932. Brave New World. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Kraemer, Joel. 1992. Humanism in the Renaissance of Islam: The Cultural Revival during the Buyid Age. Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran. 2006. “The Mirage of Global Justice.” Justice and Global Politics. Eds. Frank, Ellen Paul, Miller, Fred D. Jr., and Paul, Jeffrey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Ralph. 1987. “Beating the Neo-Platonic Bushes: Alfarabi on the Perfect State by Richard Walzer.” Journal of Religion 67 (4): 510–17.Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. 2001. Alfarabi and the Foundation of Islamic Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maroth, Miklos. 2006. The Correspondence Between Aristotle and Alexander the Great: An Anonymous Greek Novel in Letters in Arabic Translation. Piliscsaba, Hungary: Avicenna Institute of Middle Eastern Studies.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1999. “Justice and Global Inequality.” Eds. Hurrel, Andrew and Woods, Ngaire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parens, Joshua. 1994. “Multiculturalism and the Problem of Particularism.” American Political Science Review, 88 (1): 169–81.Google Scholar
Parens, Joshua. 1995. Metaphysics as Rhetoric: Alfarabi's Summary of Plato's ‘Laws .’ Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Parens, Joshua. 2006. An Islamic Philosophy of Virtuous Religions: Introducing Alfarabi. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
The Qu’rān . 1998. Trans. Yusuf Ali. Kansas City: Manat International.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 2000. On Tyranny. Eds. Gourevich, Victor and Roth, Michael S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1964. The City and Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steiris, George. 2012. “Al-Fārābī's Ecumenical State and its Modern Connotations.” Skepsis, in honour of Professor Mark Lucht, XXII/iii.Google Scholar
Stern, Samuel Miklos. 1968. Aristotle on the World-State. Oxford: Bruno Cassirer Ltd.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Michael. 2007. “Philosophy and ‘Jihād’: Al-Fārābī on Compulsion to Happiness.” The Review of Metaphysics 60 (3): 543–72.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Walzer, Richard. See Alfarabi on the Perfect State.Google Scholar