Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:55:14.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical science and archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

J. A. Charles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years the important role that scientific research techniques can play in archaeological investigations has become increasingly recognized. An early major review on the whole subject of both physical and biological science in archaeology by D. Brothwell and E. S. Higgs was revised in 1967 and represents the major work in this field. More recently, much of the effort in physical sciences has also been admirably reviewed by Tite (1970). This present paper also seeks to outline the ways in which physical science has contributed to archaeological discovery, with particular emphasis on recent developments known to the author.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 46 , Issue 182 , June 1972 , pp. 134 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. S.. 1967. Science in archaeology (London).Google Scholar
Charles, J. A. 1969. A metallurgical examination of south-east European copper axes, Proc. Prehistoric Soc., XXXV, 2, 40–2.Google Scholar
Charles, J. A. 1968. The first Sheffield Plate, Antiquity, XLII, 278–85.Google Scholar
Charles, J. A. and Leake, J. A.. 1970. Problems in the fluorescence analysis of Cu/Ag Byzantine Trachy and metallurgical information from sections, Royal Numismatic Society Symposium on the composition and analysis of Coins—to be published in 1972.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. M. 1970. Dendrochronology—the use of density charts from x-ray films for correlation studies in the Oxford region, Symposium on Archaeometry and Archaeological Prospection, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hendy, M. F., and Charles, J. A.. 1970. The production techniques, silver content and circulation history of the twelfth-century Byzantine Trachy, Archaeometry, XII, 1, 13–21.Google Scholar
Junghans, S., Sangmeister, E., and Schroder, M., 1960 and 1968. Studien zu den Anfangen der Metallurgie, Band I, Band II (Berlin).Google Scholar
Merwe, N. J. van der. 1969. The carbon 14 dating of iron, (Chicago).Google Scholar
Oddy, W. A., Schweitzer, F.. et al. 1970. A competitive analysis of some gold coins. Royal Numismatic Society Symposium on the composition and analysis of Coin’—to be published.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Dixon, J. E. and Cann, J. R.. 1966. Obsidian and early cultural contact in the near east, Proc. Prehistoric Soc., XXXII, 30–71.Google Scholar
Slater, E. A., and Charles, J. A.. 1970 Archaeological classification by metal analysis, Antiquity, XLIV, 207–13.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. 1967. Radioactive dating and methods of low-level counting, (Vienna, Internal Atomic Energy Agency), 143–51.Google Scholar
Tite, M. S. 1970. The impact of the natural sciences in archaeology, Contemp. Physics, XI, 6,523–39.Google Scholar