Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:56:03.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology in 1984

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ian Hodder
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

‘ . . . the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past’, ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’ And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered. Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting.’ (George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four, Penguin, p. 31).

Type
Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 58 , Issue 222 , March 1984 , pp. 25 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1984

References

Ammerman, A 1979. A study of obsidian exchange networks in Calabria, World Archaeology, XI, 95–110. Google Scholar
Berger, P & Luckmann, T. 1967. The social construction of reality (Harmondsworth). Google Scholar
Binford, L.R 1962. Archaeology as anthropology, American Antiquity, XXVM 217–25.Google Scholar
1965. Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process, American Antiquity, XXXI, 203–10.Google Scholar
1982. Meaning, inference and the material record, in (eds) Renfrew, C. & Shennan, S., Ranking, resource and exchange (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Childe, V. G 1925. The dawn of European civilisation (London).Google Scholar
1949. Social worlds of knowledge (Oxford). Google Scholar
Clark, J. G.D 1965. Traffic in stone axe and adze blades, Economic History Review, XVM, 1–28.Google Scholar
1975. The earlier stone age settlement of Scandinavia (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Clark, J. R 1978. Measuring changes in the ease of trade with archaeological data: an analysis of coins found at Dura Europus in Syria, Professional Geographer, XXX, 256–63. Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L 1968. Analytical archaeology (London).Google Scholar
1979. Analytical archaeologist. Collected papers of David Clarke (London).Google Scholar
Collingwood, R 1956. The idea of history (Oxford). Google Scholar
Cummins, W. A 1979. Neolithic stone axes: distribution and trade in England and Wales, in (eds) McK. Clough, T. H. & Cummins, W. A., Stone axe studies (CBA Research Report 23). Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E 1962. The idea of prehistory (Harmondsworth). Google Scholar
Deetz, J 1977. In small things forgotten (Garden City). Google Scholar
Earle, T. K& Ericson, J. E. 1977. Exchange systems in prehistory (New York).Google Scholar
1982. Contexts for prehistoric exchange (New York).Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P 1975. Against method (London). Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V 1973. Archaeology with a capital S, in (eds) Redman, C. L., et al., Research and theory in current archaeology (New York). Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V& Marcus, J. 1976. Formative Oaxaka and the Zapotek cosmos, American Scientist, LXIV, 374–83. Google Scholar
Friedel, D. A 1981. Civilisation as a state of mind, in (eds) Jones, G. & Kautz, R., Transformations to statehood (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Fritz, J. M 1978. Palaeopsychology today: ideational systems and human adaptation in prehistory, in (eds) Redman, C., et al., Social archaeology (New York). Google Scholar
Glassie, H 1975. Folk housing of Middle Virginia (Knoxville). Google Scholar
Gregory, D 1978. Ideology’, science and human geography (London).Google Scholar
Hall, R. L 1977. An anthropocentric perspective for eastern United States prehistory, American Antiquity, XLII, 499–518.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C 1954. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World, American Anthropologist, LVI, 155–68.Google Scholar
Hodder, I 1974. Regression analysis of some trade and marketing patterns, World Archaeology, VI, 172–89.Google Scholar
1982. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view, in (ed.) 1. Hodder, Symbolic and structural archaeology (Cambridge). Google Scholar
Hodder, I& Lane, P. 1982. A contextual examination of neolithic axe distribution in Britain, in (eds) Ericson, T. K. and Earle, J. E., Contexts for prehistoric exchange (New York). Google Scholar
Kehoe, A. B. & T. F 1973. Cognitive models for archaeological interpretation, American Antiquity, XXXVIII, 150–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions (Chicago). Google Scholar
Leach, E 1973. Concluding address, in (ed.) Renfrew, C., Explanation of culture change (London). Google Scholar
Leone, M. P 1978. Time in American archaeology, in (eds) Redman, C. et al., Social archaeology (New York).Google Scholar
1982. Some opinions about recovering mind, American Antiquity, XLVII, 742–60.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A 1967. The art of prehistoric man in western Europe (London). Google Scholar
Longacre, W 1970. Archaeology as anthropology, Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona, 17 (Tucson). Google Scholar
Mcbryde, I 1978. Wil-im-ee Moor-ring. Or where do axes come from? Mankind, XI, 354–82.Google Scholar
Mcvicar, J 1982. The spatial analysis of axe size and the Scottish axe distribution, Archaeological Reviews from Cambridge, I, 30-–45.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. J 1981. Ideology and material culture, in (eds) Gould, R. A. & Schiffer, M. B., Modem material culture, the archaeology of us (New York).Google Scholar
Miller, D 1980. Archaeology and development, Current Anthropology, xxi, 709–26. Google Scholar
Muller, J 1977. Individual variation in art styles, in (eds) Hill, J. & Gunn, J., The individual in prehistory (New York).Google Scholar
Parker pearson, M 1983. ‘Roses’ are read, my love, when violence is news. . ,Royal Anthropological Institute Newsletter, LV, 5 Google Scholar
Peacock, D. P.S 1969. Neolithic pottery production in Cornwall, Antiquity, XLIII, 145–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1977, Pottery and early commerce (London). Google Scholar
Pryor, F. L 1977. The origins of the economy (New York). Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C 1969. Trade and culture process in European prehistory, Current Anthropology, X, 151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1977. Alternative models for exchange and spatial distribution, in (eds) Earle, T. K. & Ericson, J., Exchange systems in prehistory (New York).Google Scholar
1982a. Discussion: contrasting paradigms, in (eds) Renfrew, A. C. & Shennan, S., Ranking, resource and exchange (Cambridge).Google Scholar
1982b. Towards an archaeology of mind (Cambridge). Google Scholar
Renfrew, A.C,Dixon, J. E & cann, J. R 1968. Further analyses of Near Eastern obsidians, Proc. Prehist. Soc., XXXIV, 319–31.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. J 1980. Kinship, alliance and exchange in the European Bronze Age, in (eds) Barrett, J. & Bradley, R., Settlement and society in the British Later Bronze Age (BAR British Series 83). Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. D 1972. Stone age economics (Chicago). Google Scholar
Shackleton, N& Renfrew, C. 1970. Neolithic trade routes re-aligned by oxygen isotope analysis, Nature, CCXXVIII, 1062–1065.Google Scholar
Shennan, S 1982. Ideology, change and the European Early Bronze Age, in (ed.) Hodder, I., Symbolic and structural archaeology (Cambridge). Google Scholar
Sidrys, R 1977. Mass-distance measures for the Maya obsidian trade, in (eds) Earle, T. K. & Ericson, J., Exchange systems in prehistory (New York). Google Scholar
Tilley, C 1981. Conceptual frameworks for the explanation of sociocultural change, in (eds) Hodder, I., Isaac, N. and Hammond, G., Pattern of the past (Cambridge). Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G 1980. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian, American Antiquity, XL, 662–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wobst, M 1977. Stylistic behaviour and information exchange, University of Michigan Museum of Anthroplogy, Anthropological Paper, LXI, 317–42.Google Scholar