Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T08:04:21.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Natural wonders and national monuments: a meditation upon the fate of The Tolmen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher Evans
Christopher Evans*
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, Department of Archaeology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A key place in the 19th-century view of the British prehistoric landscape was taken by an ancient wonder which was was not a human or artificial device at all. An account of this anomaly is called for.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 68 , Issue 259 , June 1994 , pp. 200 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borlase, W. 1769. Antiquities, Historical and Monumental, of the County of Cornwall. London: W. Bowyer & I. Nichols.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1993. Altering the earth: the origins of monuments in Britain and Continental Europe. Edinburgh: Scoiety of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
Carman, J. Forthcoming. The importance of things: archaeology and the law, in Cooper, M. Firth, A. & Wheatley, J. (ed.), Managing archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C. 1983. The making of the first Ancient Monuments Act, 1882, and its administration under General Pitt-Rivers, Journal of the British Archaeo-logical Association 136: 1–55.Google Scholar
Cleere, H. (ed.) 1984. Approaches to the archaeological heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, G.E. 1950. A hundred years of archaeology. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Edmonds, M. & Evans, C. 1991. The place of the past: art and archaeology in Britain, Excavating the Present 2. Cambridge: Kettle’s Yard.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1985. Tradition and the cultural landscape: an archeology of place, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 4: 80–94.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1988. Monuments and analogy: the interpretation of causewayed enclosures, in Burgess, C. Topping, P. Mordant, C. & Maddison, M. (ed.), Enclosures and defences in the Neolithic of western Europe: 47–73. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series S403.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1989.a Digging with the pen: novel archaeologies and literary traditions, Archaeological Review from Cambridge 8: 185–211.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1989b. Archaeology and modern times: Bersu's Woodbury 1938&1939, Antiquity 63: 436–50.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1993. Model excavations: textuality in context. Paper delivered at the Critical Approaches to the History of Archaeology group meeting, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Evans, J. 1956. A history of the Society of Antiquaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawes, L. 1975. Constable's Stonehenge. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. 1951. A guide to prehistoric and Roman monuments in England and Wales. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1989. Writing archaeology: the site report in context, Antiquity 63: 268–74.Google Scholar
Hudson, K. 1981. A social history of archaeology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jeans, D.N. 1990. Planning and the myth of the English countryside in the interwar period, Rural History 1: 249–64.Google Scholar
Koerner, J.L. 1990. Caspar David Friedrich and the subject of landscape. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
Michell, J. 1982. Megalithomania. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Murray, T. 1989. The history, philosophy and sociology of archaeology: the case of the Ancient Monuments Protection Act (1882), in Pinsky , V. & Wylie, A (ed.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: 55–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, C. 1851. On the study of archaeology, Archaeological Journal 8: 1–26.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1968. The Druids. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1976. Ruins in a landscape. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1978. Antiquity depicted. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Piper, J. 1949. Stonehenge, Architectural Review 105: 177–82.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.W. 1977. General Pitt-Rivers: evolution and archaeology in the 19th century. Bradford-on-Avon: Moonraker Press.Google Scholar
Urry, J. 1984. Englishmen, Celts and Iberians: the ethnographic survey of the United Kingdom 1892-1899, in Stocking, G.W. (ed.), Functionalism historicized, History of Anthropology 2: 83–105.Google Scholar
Way, A. 1844. Introduction, Archaeological Journal 14: 1–6.Google Scholar
Williams, R. 1973. The country and ciry. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. & Bellamy, L. 1987. Property and landscape. London: G. Philip.Google Scholar