Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:03:29.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analytical archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Glynn Isaac
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1966 David Clarke gave a series of lectures in the Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology at Cambridge entitled Archaeological Taxonomy. These served as the basis for the preparation of a much expanded and more comprehensive treatise which was published in 1968 as the first edition of Analytical archaeology. This work was a substantial tome with the ambitious intention of providing a first approximation of an overall theoretical framework for the archaeological study of material culture.

Type
Articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 55 , Issue 215 , November 1981 , pp. 200 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, W. R. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics (New York).Google Scholar
Binfohd, L. R. 1968a. Archaeological perspectives, in (eds) New perspectives in archaeology (Chicago), 5–32.Google Scholar
Binfohd, L. R. 1968b. Post pleistocene adaptations, in (eds.) Binford, L. R. & Binford), S. R. New perspectives in Archaeology (Chicago), 313-36.Google Scholar
Binfohd, L. R. 1972. An archaeological perspective (New York & London).Google Scholar
Binfohd, L. R. 1978. Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology (New York).Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. &. Binford, S. R.. 1968. (Eds) New perspectives in archaeology (Chicago).Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1950. Principes d’une méthode d’étude des techniques de débitage et de la typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen, L’Anthropologie, LIV, 19–34.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1961. Typologie du paléolithique ancien et moyen (Bordeaux).Google Scholar
Chano, K. C. 1967. Rethinking archaeology (New York).Google Scholar
Chapman, R. 1979. ‘Analytical Archaeology’ and after— Introduction, in (ed. by his colleagues), Analytical archaeologist (London), 109-43.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1956. Piecing together the past (New York).Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L. 1970. Analytical archaeology: epilogue, Norwegian Archaeological Review, 3, 25–34.Reprinted in Analytical archaeologist (ed. by his colleagues) (London, 1979).Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L. 1972. Models in archaeology (London).Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L. 1976. Mesolithic Europe: the economic basis, in (eds Sieveking, G.de, Longworth, I. H. & Wilson, K. E.) Problems m economic and social archaeology (London), 449-81.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L. 1977. Spatial archaeology (London).Google Scholar
Conkey, M. 1978.Style and information in cultural evolution: toward a predictive model for the palaeolithic, in (eds Redman, C. et al.), Social archaeology: beyond subsistence and dating (New York), 61–85.Google Scholar
Deacon, J. 1972. Wilton: an assessment after fifty years, South African Archaeological Bulletin, 27, 10–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deetz, J. 1977. In small things forgotten (Garden City).Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1968.Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica, in (ed.) Meggers, B., Anthropological archaeology in the Americas (Washington D.C.), 67–87.Google Scholar
Glassie, H. 1975. Folk houses in Middle Virginia(Knox-ville).Google Scholar
Gifford, D. 1980.Ethnoarchaeological contributions to the taphonomy of human sites, in (ed.), Behrensmeeyr, A. K. & Hill, A. P., Fossils in the making (Chicago), 94–106.Google Scholar
Could, R. 1980. Living archaeology (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hill, J. N. 1977.Individual variability in ceramics and the study of prehistoric social organisation, in (eds Hill, J. N. and Gunn, J.) The individual in prehistory(New York,) 55–108.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1977.A study in ethnoarchaeology in Western Kenya, in (ed.) Spriggs, M., Archaeology and anthropology: areas of mutual interest (Oxford, British Archaeological Reports, 19), 117–141.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1981.Society, economy and culture: an ethnographic case study amongst the Zozi, in (eds). Hodder, I., Isaac, G. and Hammond, N., Pattern of the past (Cambridge), 67–95.Google Scholar
Longacre, W. 1981.Kalinga pottery: an ethnoarchaeological study, in (eds.) Hodder, I., Isaac, G. and Hammond, N., Pattern of the past (Cambridge), 49–66.Google Scholar
Parkington, J. 1980. Time and place in the archaeology of the South Western Cape. South African Archaeological Bulletin.Google Scholar
Plog, F. 1975. Systems theory in archaeological research. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 207–224.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C. 1972. The emergence of civilization (London).Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. 1976. Behavioural archaeology (New York).Google Scholar
Stanislowski, M. B. 1974. The relationships of ethnoarchaeology, traditional and systems archaeology, in (eds.) Donnan, C. B. and Clewlow, C. W., Ethnoarchaeology (Los Angeles, Archaeological Survey Monograph No. 4).Google Scholar
Taylor, W. W. 1948. A study of archaeology, Memoir, American Anthropological Association, No. 69.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C. & E.S., Higgs 1970. Prehistoric economy in the Mount Carmel area of Palestine: site catchment analysis, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 36, 1–37.Google Scholar
Watson, P. J., Leblanc, S. A. & Redman, C. L.. 1971. Explanation in archaeology (New York).Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. & Phillips, P.. 1958. Method and theory in American archaeology (Chicago).Google Scholar
Yellen, J. 1977. Archaeological approaches to the present (New York).Google Scholar