Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:22:14.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paper Routes: Inscribing Islamic Law across the Nineteenth-Century Western Indian Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2014

Fahad Ahmad Bishara
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sometime during the middle of the nineteenth century, a correspondent from the interior of Oman wrote to the jurist Sa‘id bin Khalfan Al-Khalili (c. 1811–70) with an observation: “The Mazru‘is have wealth on the Swahili coast [al-Sawāḥil] and wealth in Oman.” This in itself was no surprise: the Mazru‘is, along with scores of other Arab clans, included a branch that had long since established its political authority in Mombasa, on the coast of what is now Kenya, but lately, the correspondent suggested, things had been changing. Members of the Mombasa Mazru‘is were now coming to Oman armed with wakalas (powers of attorney) from unknown scribes, for the sale of their familial properties in their ancestral homeland. “He [the Mazru‘i] sold what God likes from these properties and took the value… and the yield was separated from the property owners.” The people's acquiescence to the state of affairs was of particular surprise to the questioner. Days, months, and years went by, he noted, and the property owners (arbāb al-amwāl) did not seem the least bit interested in changing the system, “and the people, as you well know, come and go via this sea, from Oman to the Swahili coast, with confidence that they know [bi-ḥukm al-iṭma'ināna annahum ‘alamū].”

Type
Articles
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 797 - 820
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. ‘Ali Al-Mughairi, Sa‘id ibn, Juhaynat Al-Akhbār fī Tārīkh Zanjibār [News from the History of Zanzibar] (Muscat, Oman: Ministry of Culture and Heritage, 1979), 207–25.Google Scholar

2. Al-Khalili, Sa‘id bin Khalfan, Ajwibat Al-Muḥaqqiq Al-Khalīlī [The Inspector Al-Khalili's Responses], Vol. 4 (Muscat, Oman: Maktabat Al-Jīl Al-Wā‘id, 2010), 290.Google Scholar

3. Bose, Sugata, A Hundred Horizons: The Indian Ocean in the Age of Global Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006), 5–7Google Scholar; and Metcalf, Thomas, Imperial Connections: India in the Indian Ocean Arena, 1860–1920 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), 9–12.Google Scholar

4. Chaudhuri, K.N., Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 34.Google Scholar

5. Chaudhuri, Trade and Civilization in the Indian Ocean, 36.

6. See also Pearson, Michael, The Indian Ocean (London: Routledge, 2003)Google Scholar, 62, 82; and Risso, Patricia, Merchants and Faith: Muslim Commerce and Culture in the Indian Ocean (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995), 104–6.Google Scholar

7. For recent examples, see also Markovits, Claude, The Global World of Indian Merchants, 1750–1947: Traders of Sind from Bukhara to Panama (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Aslanian, Sebouh, From the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean: The Global Trade Networks of Armenian Merchants from New Julfa (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2011)Google Scholar; Bose, A Hundred Horizons; Ray, Himanshu Prabha and Alpers, Edward (eds.) Cross-Currents and Community Networks: the History of the Indian Ocean World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Larson, Pier, Ocean of Letters: Language and Creolization in an Indian Ocean Diaspora (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Thomas F. McDow, “Arabs and Africans: Commerce and Kinship from Oman to the East African Interior” (PhD diss., Yale University, 2008).

8. See also Benton, Lauren, A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Raman, Bhavani, Document Raj: Writing and Scribes in Early Colonial South India (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013)Google Scholar; and Burns, Kathryn, Into the Archive: Writing and Power in Colonial Peru (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

9. The differences between “lexicon” and “grammar” notwithstanding, what I hope to convey is how Muslim legal discourse gave terms, categories, and ontologies to a commercial world, while resisting the need to clearly define the shorthand terminology I use.

10. Wilkinson, John C., The Imamate Tradition of Oman (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 41–71.Google Scholar

11. Sheriff, Abdul, Slaves, Spices and Ivory in Zanzibar (Oxford: James Currey, 1987)Google Scholar, 90.

12. Sheriff, Slaves, Spices, 106.

13. Ibid., 108.

14. Ibid., 249–52; and Cooper, Frederick C., Plantation Slavery on the East Coast of Africa (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977)Google Scholar, 52.

15. Matthew S. Hopper, “The African Presence in Arabia: Slavery, the World Economy, and the African Diaspora in Eastern Arabia, 1840–1940” (PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles, 2006), 112–14.

16. Lorimer, John G., “Date Production and the Date Trade in the Persian Gulf Region,” in The Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf, Oman and Central Arabia (Slough, UK: Archive Editions, 1987)Google Scholar, Vol. 1 (Historical) Part II (Appendices), 2307.

17. Burton, Richard F., Zanzibar: City, Island, and Coast, Vol. 1 (London: Tinsley Brothers, 1872), 327–28.Google Scholar

18. Bankruptcy proceedings from the Zanzibar National Archives (hereafter ZNA) clearly illustrate this chain of agricultural credit. See the ZNA HC2 series.

19. Calvin Allen, “Sayyids, Shets and Sultans: Politics and Trade in Muscat Under the Al Bu Said, 1785–1914.” (PhD diss., University of Washington, 1978), 140–57.

20. Bhacker, M. Reda, Trade and Empire in Muscat and Zanzibar: The Roots of British Domination (London: Routledge, 1994), 136–37.Google Scholar

21. Bhacker, Trade and Empire, 328.

22. Goswami, Chhaya, The Call of the Sea: Kachchhi Traders in Muscat and Zanzibar, c. 1800–1800 (New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan, 2011): 79–121.Google Scholar

23. Mahrashtra State Archives (hereafter MSA), Political Department, 1864 Vol. 38, Comp. 511.

24. Bissell, William Cunningham, Urban Design, Chaos, and Colonial Power in Zanzibar (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2011), 31Google Scholar.

25. Prestholdt, Jeremy, “On the Global Repercussions of East African Consumerism,” American Historical Review 109 (2004), 755–81Google Scholar.

26. Al-Khalili, Ajwibat Al-Muḥaqqiq Al-Khalili, 4: 261–65.

27. McDow, “Arabs and Africans,” 152–64; ZNA AM 1/3: 36

28. ZNA AM 3/1: 80.

29. ZNA AM 3/1: 77.

30. Wilkinson, The Imamate Tradition, 30, 56, 333 n. 20.

31. Ghubash, Hussain, Oman: The Islamic Democratic Tradition (London: Routledge, 2006), 122–25, 132–33Google Scholar.

32. For a useful discussion of a similar contract in southern Yemen, see Boxberger, Linda, “Avoiding Ribā: Credit and Custodianship in Nineteenth- and Early-Twentieth Century Hadramawt,” Islamic Law and Society 5 (1998): 196–213Google Scholar.

33. Fahad Ahmad Bishara, “A Sea of Debt: Histories of Commerce and Obligation in the Indian Ocean, c. 1850–1940” (PhD diss., Duke University, 2012).

34. Rushd, Ibn, The Distinguished Jurist's Primer: A Translation of Bidāyat al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyat al-Muqtaṣid, Vol. 2 (Reading, UK: Garnet Publishing, 1995), 250–55Google Scholar. Ibn Rushd's work is a twelfth century treatise on comparative Islamic jurisprudence.

35. Al-Rusṭāqi, Khamis bin Sa‘id Al-Shaqṣi, Manhaj Al-Talibin wa Balāgh Al-Rāghibin, Vol. 7 (Muscat, Oman: Maktabat Masqaṭ 2006)Google Scholar, 301. The timing of Al-Shaqṣi's work is suggestive, as it roughly coincides with the Omani Ya‘rubi dynasty's expulsion of the Portuguese from South Arabia and East Africa and the establishment of their holdings there. However, more work is necessary to establish a link between the historical context and Al-Shaqṣi's thoughts on land and value.

36. Al-Khalili, Ajwibat Al-Muḥaqqiq Al-Khalīlī, 4:139.

37. Ibid., 4:131–32, 149, 167–68.

38. Ibid., 4:136.

39. Al-Salimi, ‘Abdullah bin Humayyid, Jawābāt Al-Imām Al-Sālimi [Imam Al-Sālimi's Responses] Vol. 4, electronic edition (Muscat, Oman: Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs, 2005)Google Scholar, 404, 513,

40. Al-Khalili, Ajwibat Al-Muḥaqqiq Al-Khalīlī, 4:136–37.

41. Ibid., 4:127–28, 132–33, 137–38, 141, 144–45, 150–51.

42. Al-Rustāqi, Manhaj Al-Ṭālibīn, 7:151, 154.

43. Ibid., 7:152.

44. Ibid., 7:152–54.

45. On Latin American notaries, see Burns, Into the Archive; on notaries in early-modern Europe, see also Nussdorfer, Laurie, Brokers of Public Trust: Notaries in Early Modern Rome (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46. Messick, Brinkley, The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993): 226–30.Google Scholar

47. Al-Khalili, Ajwibat Al-Muḥaqqiq Al-Khalīlī, 4: 131.

48. Ibid., 4: 304–5.

49. For this idea, I draw on the brilliant work of Matthew Hull, whose reflections on files and bureaucracy in modern Pakistan inspire many of my thoughts here. Hull, Matthew, Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012)Google Scholar, 138.

50. After decades of Weberian and Foucauldian analyses of how documents serve as vehicles for state or organizational power, the idea that documents can shape associations—that they are actors in their own right—has become increasingly popular amongst social scientists. See also Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hull, Government of Paper; and Messick, The Calligraphic State.

51. Al-Khalili, Ajwibat Al-Muḥaqqiq Al-Khalili, 4:290

52. Here, I am drawing from the ideas and eloquent phrasings in Latour, Reassembling the Social, 222–23.

53. Depending on where one was, a frasila could range between around 16 kg. See also Fitzgerald, William Walter Augustine, Travels in the Coastlands of British East Africa and the Islands of Zanzibar and Pemba (London: Chapman and Hall, 1898), 263–64Google Scholar, 524, 535; and “Waṣiyyat Al-Shaikh Humayd bin Rashid bin Humayd Al-Yazīdī [Shaikh Humayd bin Rashid bin Humayd Al-Yazidi's Will],” July 2008 http://www.s-jjj.com/vb/showthread.php?t=87 (January 26, 2013). A mid-nineteenth century Somali report, however, identifies a frasila of frankincense as comprising only 9 kg; see Cruttendren, C. J., “Notes on the Mijjertheyn Somalees,” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 13 (1844): 332.Google Scholar

54. Na‘ā’im Khalid, “Al-qabḍ ‘alā ghashshāsh al-bahārāt fī Ta‘iz [The Capture of a Spice Fraud in Ta‘iz]” Al-Jumhūriyya, September 9, 2008, http://www.algomhoriah.net/newsweekprint.php?sid=69047 (January 26, 2013).

55. Not all waraqas would have been equally valuable. The aesthetic qualities of each—whether it bore a seal, the clarity of the writing, or whether it involved a pledge of property—would have shaped its value during the process of negotiability.

56. In a bill of exchange, the person in whose hands the bill of exchange ended up would have recourse to the original debtor and everyone else who may have endorsed it, for satisfaction of the debt.

57. In one case from 1874, a Pangani-based Indian merchant transferred to his Zanzibar creditor waraqas worth a whopping MTD 13,000—the value of nearly three large plantations, including slaves—to settle his accounts. Ramdas Jethani v. Dowarka Liladhur and Kanjee Liladhur (1875) ZNA HC 7/5. In 1877, another Khoja merchant, Salehmahomed Ebrahim, hypothecated his title deeds to four houses in Saadani, on the East African coast, to the Zanzibar merchant Ebrahim Passyani, for MTD 190. ZNA AA 12/19: 94. In another 1880 claim against the Tanga-based debtor Noorbhai Ebrahimji, the Zanzibar merchant Esmailji Jivanji collected 10 waraqas that Ebrahimji had in his possession: waraqas signed by Ebrahimji's debtors in the interior. Esmailji Jeevunji v. Noorbhai Ebrahimji (Tanga) (1880) ZNA HC 7/155.

58. When, in the summer of 1896, the Khoja Hirji Ramji sought to borrow MTD 300 from another Khoja, Rashid Nanji, he hypothecated seven waraqas, five of which involved titles to shambas; the other two were personal guarantees for MTD 96.5. He also hypothecated two mud huts, which he had presumably collected from his debtors. ZNA AM 1/4:38.

59. Hull, Government of Paper, 14.

60. Lorimer, Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf, Vol. 1 (Historical), 488.