Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:20:48.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Wisby Armour*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ellis H. Minns
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 18 , Issue 72 , December 1944 , pp. 197 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Surely not as translated, p. 23, ‘who fell into the hands of the Danes’, but ‘fell (i.e. were slain) by the hands of the Danes’, a Hebraism copied from the Vulgate, e.g. 1. Chron. XX, 7, qui ceciderunt in manu David (found for me by Canon W. L. Knox).

2 See M. Garbutt, ‘Japanese Armour from the Inside’, Japanese Society of London, 1912, XI, 134–85, esp. p. 143 for remarks about the disadvantages of lacing.

3 ‘Chinese Clay Figures’, Field Museum, Chicago (Publication 177, Anihr. Ser. XIII, 2, 1914).

4 See Ct. O. Trapp and J. G. Mann, The Armoury of . . . Churburg, 1929 and Mann in Archaeologia, 1935, LXXXIV, p. 69, also F. M. Kelly, Apollo, 1930, p. 37.