Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:03:27.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robust minimality of iterated function systems with two generators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2013

ALE JAN HOMBURG  and
MEYSAM NASSIRI
ALE JAN HOMBURG
Affiliation:
KdV Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Mathematics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands email a.j.homburg@uva.nl
MEYSAM NASSIRI
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), PO Box 19395-5746, Tehran, Iran email nassiri@ipm.ir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We prove that every compact manifold without boundary admits a pair of diffeomorphisms that generates ${C}^{1} $ robustly minimal dynamics. We apply the results to the construction of blenders and robustly transitive skew product diffeomorphisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 1914 - 1929
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrientos, P. G., Ki, Y. and Raibekas, A.. Symbolic blender horseshoe and applications, in preparation, 2012.Google Scholar
Bergelson, V., Misiurewicz, M. and Senti, S.. Affine actions of a free semigroup on the real line. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26 (2006), 1285–1305.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Díaz, L. J.. Persistent non-hyperbolic transitive diffeomorphisms. Ann. of Math. (2) 143 (1996), 357–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatti, C. and Díaz, L. J.. Abundance of ${C}^{1} $-robust homoclinic tangencies. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 5111–5148.Google Scholar
Bonatti, C., Díaz, L. J. and Viana, M.. Dynamics Beyond Uniform Hyperbolicity (Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 102). Springer, Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar
Ghane, F. H., Homburg, A. J. and Sarizadeh, A.. ${C}^{1} $ robustly minimal iterated function systems. Stoch. Dyn. 10 (2010), 155–160.Google Scholar
Ghane, F. H. and Saleh, M.. ${C}^{1} $-robustly minimal IFS with three generators. Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 20 (2010), 3373–3377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorodetskiĭ, A. S. and Il’yashenko, Yu. S.. Certain properties of skew products over a horseshoe and a solenoid. Dynamical Systems, Automata, and Infinite Groups (Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 231). Ed. Grigorchuk, R. I.. MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica, Moscow, 2000, pp. 90–112.Google Scholar
Hirsch, M., Pugh, C. and Shub, M.. Invariant Manifolds (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 583). Springer, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
Homburg, A. J.. Circle diffeomorphisms forced by expanding circle maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 32 (2012), 2011–2024.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. E.. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 713–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katok, A. and Hasselblatt, B.. Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. With a Supplement by Anatole Katok and Leonardo Mendoza (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, 54). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Nassiri, M.. Robustly transitive sets in nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems. PhD Thesis, IMPA, 2006.Google Scholar
Nassiri, M. and Pujals, E.. Robust transitivity in Hamiltonian dynamics. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 45 (2012), 191–239.Google Scholar
Pujals, E. R. and Sambarino, M.. Homoclinic bifurcations, dominated splitting, and robust transitivity. Handbook of Dynamical Systems. Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 327–378.Google Scholar
Volk, D.. Persistent massive attractors of smooth maps. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. to appear.Google Scholar