Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:22:42.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalizing a model beyond the inherence heuristic and applying it to beliefs about objective value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Graham Wood
Graham Wood*
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, University of Tasmania, Launceston, 7250 Tasmania, Australia. graham.wood@utas.edu.auhttp://www.utas.edu.au/humanities/people/philosophy-profiles/Graham-Wood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inherence heuristic is characterized as part of an instantiation of a more general model that describes the interaction between undeveloped intuitions, produced by System 1 heuristics, and developed beliefs, constructed by System 2 reasoning. The general model is described and illustrated by examining another instantiation of the process that constructs belief in objective moral value.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 504 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertulis, A. & Bulatov, A. (2001) Distortions of length perception in human vision. Biomedicine 1:3–26.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983) The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2002) Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Nobel Prize Lecture (accessed March 2011). Available at: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:645–65.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2012) Attributing agency: Fast and frugal or all things considered? In: Scientific approaches to the philosophy of religion, ed. Nagasawa, Y., pp. 71–91. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar