Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:32:34.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Importance of Ecological Economics in the Undergraduate Environmental Sciences and Sustainability Curricula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2014

Christie A. Klimas
Christie A. Klimas*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Environmental Science and Studies, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois.
*
Address correspondence to: Christie A. Klimas, Assistant Professor of Environmental Science and Studies, McGowan South 203D, DePaul University, 2400 North Sheffield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60614; (phone) 773-325-8423; (fax) 773-325-7448; (e-mail) cklimas@depaul.edu.
Get access

Abstract

For students of environmental science and studies, as well as students in sustainability programs, critical thinking about the economy–environment interdependence is a key learning objective and a foundational part of the undergraduate curriculum. There are many courses that could provide initial exposure to economic theory. However, not all are as adept at providing this combination of critical thinking, relevance to important global issues, and economy–environment interdependence. This article looks at neoclassical economics, environmental economics, and ecological economics and uses the literature to weigh which of these courses would be most well suited for an introductory economics course in environmental science and studies and sustainability undergraduate curriculum. Introductory courses in neoclassical economics have been criticized for avoiding controversy, failing to consider the moral dilemmas with economic theory and policy, and excluding ethics. Additionally, neoclassical economics treats the study of economy–environment interdependence as an optional extra rather than as one of the immutable foundations of the field. Environmental economics uses a variety of techniques to assign market values to externalities like ecosystem services, pollution, and natural resource depletion so that they can be incorporated into the market model. These techniques alone, however, do not provide a correct framework through which to view the interdependence between the economy and the environment. Ecological economics, while far from the current economic paradigm, allows for critical consideration of this interdependence.

Environmental Practice 16: 1–9 (2014)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 230 - 238
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G.A. 2007. The Missing Motivation in Microeconomics. American Economic Review 97(1):5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allaby, M. 2000. Basics of Environmental Science. Routledge, London, 323 pp.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.W., Tiesl, M., Criner, G., Tisher, S., Smith, S., Hunter, M., Norton, S.A., Jellison, J., Alyokhin, A., Gallandt, E., Haggard, S., and Bicknell, E.. 2007. Attitude Changes of Undergraduate Students in General Education Courses. Journal of General Education 56(2):149–168.Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B. 2007. Valuing Ecosystem Services as Productive Inputs. Economic Policy 22(49):177–229.Google Scholar
Bartlett, R.L., Ferber, M.A., and Green, C.A.. 2009. Political Orientation and the Decision to Major in Economics: Some Preliminary Observations. International Review of Economic Education 8(1):13–31.Google Scholar
Baxter, G.P., and Glaser, R.. 1997. December. An Approach to Analyzing the Cognitive Complexity of Science Performance Assessments. CSE Technical Report 452. Natural Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 33 pp. Available at https://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/TECH452.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, W.E. 2003. How to Make Economics the Sexy Social Science. Southern Economic Journal 70(1):195–198.Google Scholar
Becker, W.E. 2007. Quit Lying and Address the Controversies: There Are No Dogmata, Laws, Rules or Standards in the Science of Economics. American Economist 51(1):3–14.Google Scholar
Becker, W.E., and Watts, M.. 2000. Teaching Economics at the Start of the 21st Century: Still Chalk-and-Talk. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 91(2):446–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K.E. 1988. What Do We Want in an Economics Textbook? Journal of Economic Education 19(2):113–132.Google Scholar
Christensen, N. 2013. The Environment and You. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 635 pp.Google Scholar
Cipriani, G.P., Lubian, D., and Zago, A.. 2009. Natural Born Economists? Journal of Economic Psychology 30(3):455–468.Google Scholar
Colander, D. 2000. Telling Better Stories in Introductory Macro. American Economic Review 90(2):76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, D. 2003. Integrating Sex and Drugs into the Principles Course: Market-Failures Versus Failures-of-Market Outcomes. Journal of Economic Education 34(1):82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Common, M, and Stagl, S.. 2005. Ecological Economics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 560 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily, G.C. ed. 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, 392 pp.Google Scholar
Daily, G.C., and Ellison, K.. 2002. The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable. Island Press, Washington, DC, 260 pp.Google Scholar
Daily, G.C., Kareiva, P.M., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T.H., and Tallis, H.. 2011. Mainstreaming Natural Capital into Decisions. In Natural Capital Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services, P. Kareiva, H. Tallis, T.H. Ricketts, G.C. Daily and S. Polasky, eds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3–14.Google Scholar
Daly, H.E., and Farley, J.. 2004. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Island Press, Washington, DC, 454 pp.Google Scholar
Das, S., and Vincent, J.R.. 2009. Mangroves Protected Villages and Reduced Death Toll during Indian Super Cyclone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106(18):7357–7360.Google Scholar
Davidson, M.D. 2013. On the Relation between Ecosystem Services, Intrinsic Value, Existence Value and Economic Valuation. Ecological Economics 95:171–177.Google Scholar
De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M., and Boumans, R.. 2002. A Typology for the Description, Classification and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions as a Unifying Concept for Ecology and Economics. Environmentalist 7(2):105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K., Mertig, A., and Jones, R.. 2000. Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3):425–442.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, D. 1988. Why Put a Value on Biodiversity?. In Biodiversity, E.O. Wilson, ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 191–224.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R., and Ehrlich, A.H.. 1981. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. Random House, New York, 305 pp.Google Scholar
Faravelli, M. 2007. How Context Matters: A Survey Based Experiment on Distributive Justice. Journal of Public Economics 91(7–8):1399–1422.Google Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, K., Zylstra, M., Brouwer, R., Groot, R.D., Farber, S., Ferrano, P., Green, R., Hadley, D., Harlow, J., Jefferiss, P., Kirby, C., Morling, P., Mowatt, S., Naidoo, R., Paavola, J., Strassburg, B., Yu, D., and Balmford, A.. 2008. Ecosystem Services and Economic Theory: Integration for Policy-Relevant Research. Ecological Applications 18(8):2050–2067.Google Scholar
Folsom, D., and Brauer, J.. 1998. October. Sustainable Development: Coverage in Principles of Economics Texts. In Refereed Proceedings of the 40th Annual Mountain Plains Management Conference, Denver, CO, 107–113.Google Scholar
Friedland, A., Reylea, R., and Courard-Hauri, D.. 2012. Environmental Science Foundations and Applications. W.H. Freeman, New York, 685 pp.Google Scholar
Gowdy, J., Hall, C., Klitgaard, K., and Krall, L.. 2010. What Every Conservation Biologist Should Know about Economic Theory. Conservation Biology 24(6):1440–1447.Google Scholar
Green, T.L. 2012. Introductory Economics Textbooks: What Do They Teach about Sustainability? International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education 4(3):189–223.Google Scholar
Green, T.L. 2013. Teaching (Un)Sustainability? University Sustainability Commitments and Student Experiences of Introductory Economics. Ecological Economics 94:135–142.Google Scholar
Harraway, J., Broughton-Ansin, F., Deaker, L., Jowett, T., and Shephard, K.. 2012. Exploring the Use of the Revised New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) to Monitor the Development of Students’ Ecological Worldviews. Journal of Environmental Education 43(3):177–191.Google Scholar
Heal, G.M., Barbier, E.E., Boyle, K.J., Covich, A.P., Gloss, S.P., Hershner, C.H., Hoehn, J.P., Pringle, C.M., Polasky, S., Segerson, K., and Shrader-Frechette, K.. 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. National Research Council, Washington, DC, 278 pp.Google Scholar
Hill, R., and Myatt, T.. 2010. The Economics Anti-textbook: A Critical Thinker’s Guide to Micro-economics. Zed Books, London, 305 pp.Google Scholar
Kallis, G., Gómez-Baggethun, E., and Zografos, C.. 2013. To Value or Not to Value? That Is Not the Question. Ecological Economics 94:97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, S. 2011. Debunking Macroeconomics. Economic Analysis and Policy 41(3):147–167.Google Scholar
Kosoy, N., and Corbera, E.. 2010. Payments for Ecosystem Services as Commodity Fetishism. Ecological Economics 69(6):1128–1236.Google Scholar
Layfield, D. 2012. Turning Carbon into Gold: The Financialisation of International Climate Policy. Environmental Politics 22(6):901–917.Google Scholar
Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L.. 1996. Developing Model-Based Reasoning in Mathematics and Science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 21(1):39–48.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 235 pp.Google Scholar
McCauley, D.J. 2006. Selling Out on Nature. Nature 443(7107):27–28.Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, 137 pp. Available at http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.Google Scholar
Moseley, F., Gunn, C., and Georges, C.. 1991. Emphasizing Controversy in the Economics Curriculum. Journal of Economic Education 22(3):235–240.Google Scholar
Nahser, F.B. 2012. Ethics and Economics: A Unique Opportunity for NAEP Members. Environmental Practice 14(3):224–232.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 374 pp.Google Scholar
Nelson, J.A. 2009. The Principles Course. In The Handbook of Pluralistic Economics Education, J. Reardon, ed. Routledge, New York, 57–68.Google Scholar
Northrop, E. 2000. Normative Foundations of Introductory Economics. American Economist 44(1):53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. 1987. Why Preserve Natural Variety?. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 300 pp.Google Scholar
Reardon, J. 2007. How Green Are Principles of Economics Textbooks? An Investigation into How Mainstream Economics Educates Students Pertaining to Energy, the Environment and Green Economics. International Journal of Green Economics 1(3–4):381–393.Google Scholar
Rees, W.E. 1998. How Should a Parasite Value Its Host? Ecological Economics 25(1):49–52.Google Scholar
Robertson, M.M. 2004. The Neoliberalism of Ecosystem Services: Wetland Mitigation Banking and Problems in Environmental Governance. Geoforum 35(3):361–373.Google Scholar
Rolston, H. III. 2000. The Land Ethic at the Turn of the Millennium. Biodiversity and Conservation 9(8):1045–1058.Google Scholar
Salemi, M.K., and Siegfried, J.J.. 1999. The State of Economic Education. American Economic Review 89(2):355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M.J. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 244 pp.Google Scholar
Sathirathai, S., and Barbier, E.B.. 2001. Valuing Mangrove Conservation in Southern Thailand. Contemporary Economic Policy 19(2):109–122.Google Scholar
Saunders, S.G. 2008. Toward Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Reality. South African Journal of Economics 76(4):738–748.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2009. Capitalism Beyond the Crisis. New York Review of Books 56:27–30.Google Scholar
Soma, K. 2006. Natura economica in Environmental Valuation. Environmental Values 15(1):31–50.Google Scholar
Soulé, M.E. 1985. What Is Conservation Biology? BioScience 35(11):727–734.Google Scholar
Spash, C.L. 2008. How Much Is That Ecosystem in the Window? The One with the Biodiverse Trail. Environmental Values 17(2):259–284.Google Scholar
Spash, C.L. 2010. The Brave New World of Carbon Trading. New Political Economy 15(2):169–195.Google Scholar
Spash, C.L. 2013. The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement? Ecological Economics 93:351–362.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. 1994. Whither Socialism? MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 352 pp.Google Scholar
Talbert, J.E., and McLaughlin, M.W.. 1993. Understanding Teaching in Context. In Teaching for Understanding: Challenges for Policy and Practice, D.K. Cohen, M.W. McLaughlin and J.E. Talbert, eds. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 167–206.Google Scholar
Tiesl, M.F., Anderson, M.W., Noblet, C.L., Criner, K., Rubin, J., and Dalton, T.. 2011. Are Environmental Professors Unbalanced? Evidence from the Field. Journal of Environmental Education 42(2):67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlachou, A. 2014. The European Union’s Emissions Trading System. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38(1):127–152.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of the Higher Psychological Process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 159 pp.Google Scholar
Watts, M., and Becker, W.E.. 2008. A little More Than Chalk and Talk: Results from the Third National Survey of Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Economics Courses. Journal of Economic Education 39(3):273–286.Google Scholar
Withgott, J., and Laposata, M.. 2012. Essential Environment: The Science Behind the Stories. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 418 pp.Google Scholar
Wittneben, B.B.F. 2009. Exxon Is Right: Let Us Re-examine Our Choice for a Cap-and-Trade System Over a Carbon Tax. Energy Policy 37(6):2462–2464.Google Scholar