Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:43:25.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceived Interactional Justice and Trust-in-supervisor as Mediators for Paternalistic Leadership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Min Wu ,
Xu Huang ,
Chenwei Li  and
Wu Liu
Min Wu
Affiliation:
Sichuan University, China
Xu Huang
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
Chenwei Li
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, USA
Wu Liu
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study identifies the influencing processes that underlie the effect of the three paternalistic leadership dimensions on subordinates' work performance/ organizational citizenship behaviours. The results, based on data collected from private firms in China, showed that perceived interactional justice mediated the effects of moral leadership and benevolent leadership on trust-in-supervisor. However, perceived interactional justice did not mediate the relationship between authoritarian leadership and trust-in-supervisor. In addition, trust-in-supervisor was found to be positively associated with work performance and organizational citizenship behaviours. Cultural and practical implications and future research directions are also discussed.

Keywords

interactional justiceorganizational citizenship behaviourspaternalistic leadershiptrust-in-supervisorwork performance交互公平组织公民行为家长式领导对主管的信任工作绩效
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 8 , Issue 1: Special Issue Indigenous Management Research in China , March 2012 , pp. 97 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. 2002. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3): 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. 2007. Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervisor: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1): 191–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. 1998. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1): 45–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandalos, D. L. 2002. The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structure Equation Modeling, 9(1): 78–102.Google Scholar
Barling, J., & Phillips, M. 1993. Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace: An exploratory study. Journal of Psychology, 127(6): 649–656.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H. & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations, vol. 1: 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. 1987. Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1(2): 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349-381. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H., Wan, K. C., Leung, K., & Giacalone, R. A. 1985. How are responses to verbal insults related to cultural collectivism and power distance? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(1): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. M. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., & Farh, J. L. 2009. Developments in Chinese leadership: Paternalism and its elaborations, moderations, and alternatives. In Harris, B. M. (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese psychology: 599-622. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, H. Y., & Kao, H. S. R. 2009. Chinese paternalistic leadership and non-Chinese subordinates' psychological health. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12): 2533–2546.Google Scholar
Chen, M. J. 2002. Transcending paradox: The Chinese ‘middle way’ perspective. Asian Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3): 179–199.Google Scholar
Chen, X. P., Xie, X. F., & Chang, S. Q. 2011. Cooperative and competitive orientations in China: Scale development and validation. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 353–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. R., Chen, X. P., & Portnoy, R. 2009. To whom do positive norm and negative norm of reciprocity apply? Effects of inequitable offer, relationship, and relational-self orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1): 24–34.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S. 1995. Authoritarian values and executive leadership: The case of Taiwanese family enterprises. Report prepared for Taiwan's National Science Council. Taiwan: National Taiwan University. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. 2000. A triad model of Paternalistic Leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14: 3–64. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. 2004. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1): 89–117.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Huang, M. P., & Chou, L. F. 2002a. Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3(1): 85–112. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Shieh, P. Y., & Chou, L. F. 2002b. The principal's leadership, leader-member exchange quality, and the teacher's extra-role behavior: The effects of transformational and paternalistic leadership. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17: 105–161. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Chiaburu, D. S., & Lim, A. S. 2008. Manager trustworthiness or interactional justice? Predicting organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3): 453–467.Google Scholar
Chou, L. F., Cheng, B. S., &Jen, C. K. 2005. The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 425–145.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., & Chen, P. Y. 2002. Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27(3): 324–351.Google Scholar
Dirks, K. T., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2004. Trust in leaders: Existing research and emerging issues. In Kramer, R. M. & Cook, K. S. (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches: 21-40. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Ertürk, A. 2007. Increasing organizational citizenship behaviors of Turkish academicians: Mediating role of trust in supervisor on the relationship between organizational justice and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3): 257–270.Google Scholar
Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Li, J. T., Tsui, A. S. & Weldon, E. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context: 84-127. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. P. 2006. Authority and benevolence: Employees' responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In Tsui, A. S., Bian, Y. & Cheng, L. (Eds.), China's domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance: 230-260. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3): 421–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. 2008. Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 171-205. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fu, P. P., Chow, I. H., & Zhang, Y. L. 2001. Leadership approaches and perceived leadership effectiveness in Chinese township and village enterprises. Journal of Asian Business, 17(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A. L., & Gong, Y. P. 2010. Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1): 122–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. 1984. Mediators, moderators, and test for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2): 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. 2006. A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2): 233–244.Google Scholar
Kalton, G. 1977. Practical methods for estimating survey sampling errors. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 47(3): 495–514.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. 1994. Work motivation: New directions in theory and research. In Cooper, C. L. & Robertson, I. T. (Eds.), Key reviews in managerial psychology: Concepts and research for practice: 1-53. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1: 233–265. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, J. B., & Jones, J. 2009. The roles of group importance and anxiety in predicting depersonalized ingroup trust. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(2): 227–239.Google Scholar
Kish, L. 1965. Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Kish, L. 1982. Design effect. In Kotz, S. & Johnson, N. L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences: 347-348. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. 1994. Citizenship behavior and social exchange. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 656–669.Google Scholar
Kwon, S., Kim, M. S., Kang, S. C., & Kim, M. U. 2008. Employee reactions to gainsharing under seniority pay systems: The mediating effect of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Human Resource Management, 47(4): 757–775.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Allen, N.J. 2002. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 131–142.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2005. How gcneralizable are justice effects across cultures. In Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice: 555-586. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Tong, K. K., & Ho, S. S. Y. 2004. Effects of interactional justice on egocentric bias in resource allocation decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 405–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, P. P. 1998. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19(5): 829–861.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 413–439.Google Scholar
Liang, S. K., Ling, H. C., & Hsieh, S. Y. 2007. The mediating effects of leader-member exchange quality to influence the relationships between paternalistic leadership and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10(2): 127–137.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L. Z., & Wu, W. K. 2010. Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 835–856.Google Scholar
Luo, J. D. 2005. Particularistic trust and general trust: A network analysis in Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 437–458.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variables effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macneil, I. R. 1985. Relational contracts: What we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, 483–525.Google Scholar
Mallin, M. L., O'Donnell, E., & Hu, M. Y. 2009. The role of uncertainty and sales control in the development of sales manager trust. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(1): 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, P. G. 2003. Paternalism as a positive form of leader-subordinate exchange: Evidence from Mexico. Management Research: The Journal of Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(3): 227–242.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 709–734.Google Scholar
Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. 1998. Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? The Academy of Management Journal, 41(3): 351–357.Google Scholar
Ng, K. Y., & Chua, R. Y. J. 2006. Do I contribute more when I trust more? Differential effects of cognition- and affect-based trust. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 527–556.Google Scholar
Niu, C. P., Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. 2009. Effectiveness of a moral and benevolent leader: Probing the interactions of the dimensions of paternalistic leadership. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1): 32–39.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2006. Leader-member exchange (LMX), paternalism and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2): 264–279.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research, Journal of Management, 34(3): 566–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A., & Jayaraman, V. 2010. Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader - member exchange theory. Group & Organization Management, 35(4): 391–420.Google Scholar
Pillai, R., Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. 1999a. Leadership and organizational justice: Similarities and differences across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(4): 763–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillai, R., Schricsheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. 1999. Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25(6): 897–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. 1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1): 95–112.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3): 245–259.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393–404.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., Mayer, D. M., Saltz, J. L., & Niles-Jolly, K. 2005. Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1017–1032.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4): 422–445.Google Scholar
Silin, R. H. 1976. Leadership and value: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Lcinhart, S. (Ed.), Sociological methodology: 290-312. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, M. 2005. Paternalism as a form of leadership: Differentiating paternalism from leader-member exchange. Honolulu, HI: Academy of Management Meeting.Google Scholar
Van der Vcgt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. 2003. Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6): 715–727.Google Scholar
Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. 2010. When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1): 106–121.Google Scholar
Wasti, S. A., Tan, H. H., & Erdil, S. E. 2011. Antecedents of trust across foci: A comparative study of Turkey and China. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 279–302.Google Scholar
Westwood, R. I., & Leung, S. M. 1996. Work under the reforms: The experience and meaning of work in a time of transition. In Westwood, R. I. (Ed.), China review: 368-423. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S. E. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3): 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, K. M. 1985. Introduction to variance estimation. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wong, Y. T., Ngo, H. Y., & Wong, C. S. 2006. Perceived organizational justice, trust, and OCB: A study of Chinese workers in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises. Journal of World Business, 41(4): 344–355.Google Scholar
Wong, Y. T., Wong, C. S., & Ngo, H. Y. 2002. Loyalty to supervisor and trust in supervisor of workers in Chinese joint ventures: A test of two competing models. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(6): 883–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T. Y., Hsu, W. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2002. Expressing or suppressing anger: Subordinate's anger responses to supervisors' authoritarian behaviors in a Taiwan enterprise. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 18: 3–49. (In Chinese).Google ScholarPubMed
Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. 2011. Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, DOI: 10.1002/job.768.Google Scholar
Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, W., Zhang, X. H., & Wai, A. Y. 2010. Paternalistic leadership and work behaviors: The mediating roles of fear, gratitude, and identification. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management Special Issue Symposium, Macau.Google Scholar
Yang, J., & Mossholder, K. W. 2010. Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1): 50–63.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. 2009. Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 143–154.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. 1993. Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In Cheng, L. Y., Cheng, F. M. C. & Chen, C. N. (Eds.), Psychotherapy for the Chinese: Selected papers from the first international conference: 19-56. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar