Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:53:03.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Twisted K-theory constructions in the case of a decomposable Dixmier-Douady class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2014

Antti J. Harju
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Finland
Jouko Mickelsson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Finland, jouko.mickelsson@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Twisted K-theory on a manifold X, with twisting in the 3rd integral cohomology, is discussed in the case when X is a product of a circle and a manifold M. The twist is assumed to be decomposable as a cup product of the basic integral one form on and an integral class in H2(M,ℤ). This case was studied some time ago by V. Mathai, R. Melrose, and I.M. Singer. Our aim is to give an explicit construction for the twisted K-theory classes using a quantum field theory model, in the same spirit as the supersymmetric Wess-Zumino-Witten model is used for constructing (equivariant) twisted K-theory classes on compact Lie groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ISOPP 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AtSe.Atiyah, M.F. and Segal, G.: Twisted K-theory. Ukr. Mat. Visn. 1(3) (2004), 287330; translation in Ukr. Math. Bull. 1(3) (2004), 291-334.Google Scholar
BGV.Berline, N., Getzler, E., Vergne, M.: Heat Kernels and Dirac Operators. SpringerVerlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Bi.Bismut, J.-M.: Localization formulas, superconnections, and the index theorem for families. Comm. Math. Phys. 103(1) (1986), 127166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BCMMS.Bouwknegt, P., Carey, A., Mathai, V., Murray, M., and Stevenson, D.: Twisted K-theory and K-theory of bundle gerbes. Comm. Math. Phys. 228(1) (2002), 1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CMM.Carey, A., Mickelsson, J., and Murray, M.: Index theory, gerbes, and Hamiltonian quantization. Comm. Math. Phys. 183(3) (1997), 707722.Google Scholar
CMW.Carey, A. L., Mickelsson, J., and Wang, Bai-Ling: Differential twisted K-theory and applications. J. Geom. Phys. 59(5) (2009), 632653.Google Scholar
DD.Dixmier, J. and Douady, A.: Champs continus d'espaces hilbertiens et de C *-algèbres. Bull. Soc. Math. France 91 (1963), 227284.Google Scholar
DK.Donovan, P. and Karoubi, M.: Graded Brauer groups and K-theory with local coefficients. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 38 (1970), 525.Google Scholar
FHT.Freed, D. S., Hopkins, M., and Teleman, C.: Twisted equivariant K-theory with complex coefficients. J. Topol. 1(1) (2008), 1644.Google Scholar
FHT2.Freed, D. S., Hopkins, M., and Teleman, C.: Loop groups and twisted K-theory II, Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (2013), 595644.Google Scholar
Lott.Lott, John: Higher-degree analogs of the determinant line bundle. Comm. Math. Phys. 230(1) (2002), 4169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MMS.Mathai, V., Melrose, R.B., and Singer, I.M.: The index of projective families of elliptic operators: the decomposable case. Astérisque 328 (2009), 255296.Google Scholar
Mi.Mickelsson, J.: Gerbes, (twisted) K-theory, and the supersymmetric WZW model. Infinite dimensional groups and manifolds, 93-107, IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys. 5, de Gruyter, Berlin, 2004.Google Scholar
MP.Mickelsson, J. and Pellonpää, J.-P.: Families Index Theorem in Supersymmetric WZW Model and Twisted K-Theory: The SU(2) Case. Comm. Math. Phys. 271 (2007), 775789.Google Scholar
PS.Pressley, A. and Segal, G.: Loop Groups, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
RR.Raeburn, I. and Rosenberg, J.: Crossed products of continuous-trace C*-algebras by smooth actions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 305(1) (1988), 145.Google Scholar
Ro.Rosenberg, J.: Continuous-trace algebras from the bundle theoretic point of view. J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 47(3) (1989), 368381.Google Scholar