Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:39:01.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the acquisition of plural morphology in Jordanian Arabic*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

ABDULKAFI ALBIRINI
ABDULKAFI ALBIRINI*
Affiliation:
Utah State University
*
Address for correspondence: Utah State University (Languages, Philosophy and Communication Studies, 0720 Old Main, Logan, Utah 84321, United States. e-mail: Abdulkafi.albirini@usu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the development of plural morphology in Jordanian Arab children, and explores the role of the predictability, transparency, productivity, and frequency of different plural forms in determining the trajectory that children follow in acquiring this complex inflectional system. The study also re-examines the development of the notion of default over several years. Sixty Jordanian children, equally divided among six age groups (three to eight years), completed an oral real-word pluralization task and a nonsense-word pluralization task. The findings indicate that feminine sound plurals are acquired before and extended to the other plural forms. Productivity and frequency seem to shape the acquisition patterns among younger children, but predictability becomes more critical at a later age. Younger children use the most productive plural as the default form, but older children tend to use two default forms based on frequency distributions in the adult language. The theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , July 2015 , pp. 734 - 762
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

This study has benefited greatly from the work of Elabbas Benmamoun and his associates on plural morphology (see ‘References’) and from Benmamoun's invaluable feedback on this research. Special thanks go to the participants in the study and to the school staff who facilitated the collection of the data. I would like to acknowledge the statistical help of Xin Dai. I am grateful to the JCL editors and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. All errors are, of course, mine.

References

REFERENCES

Aguirre, C. & Marrero, V. (2009). Number morphology in Spanish first language acquisition. In Stephany, U. & Voeikova, M. (eds), The acquisition of number and case from a typological perspective, 341–70. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Albirini, A. (2013). Toward understanding the variability in the language proficiencies of Arabic heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, online: doi: 10.1177/1367006912472404.Google Scholar
Albirini, A. (2014). The role of varied input in the divergent outcomes of heritage language acquisition. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Heritage/Community Languages, California, 19–21 February. Google Scholar
Albirini, A. & Benmamoun, E. (in press). Concatenative and non-concatenative plural formation in L1, L2, and heritage speakers. Modern Language Journal, 98(3).Google Scholar
Aljenaie, K., Abdalla, F. & Farghal, M. (2011). Developmental changes in using nominal number inflections in Kuwaiti Arabic. First Language 31(2), 222–39.Google Scholar
Badry, F. (1983). Acquisition of lexical derivational rules in Moroccan Arabic: implications for the development of standard Arabic as a second language through literacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E. (1999). Arabic morphology: the central role of imperfective. Lingua 108, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E. (2003). The role of the imperfective template in Arabic morphology. In Shimron, J. (ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology, 99–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E. & Albirini, A. (2012). Arabic as heritage, L1, and L2 language: similarities and differences. Paper presented at the Sixth Heritage Language Research Institute, UCLA. 18–22 June.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Albirini, A., Montrul, S. & Saadah, E. (2014). Arabic plurals and root and pattern morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(1), 89–123.Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14, 150–77.Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S. & Gaskell, G. M. (2002). A re-examination of the default system for Arabic plurals. Language and Cognitive Processes 17, 321–43.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 425–55.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemes in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58, 265–89.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45, 225–55.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (1997). Studies in pre- and protomorphology. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (2000). Naturalness. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C. & Mugdan, J. (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook on inflection and word-formation, vol. 1, 288–96. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (2003). Degrees of grammatical productivity in inflectional morphology. Rivista di Linguistica 15(1), 31–62.Google Scholar
Elman, J., Bates, E., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Johnson, M., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: development in a connectionist perspective. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, M., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E. & Jurafsky, D. (2000). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Chicago Linguistic Society 35, 151–66.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1988). Templatic transfer in Arabic broken plurals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 247–70.Google Scholar
Idrissi, A., Prunet, J. & Béland, R. (2008). On the mental representation of Arabic roots. Linguistic Inquiry 39(2), 221–59.Google Scholar
Laaha, S. & Dressler, W. U. (2012). Suffix predictability and stem transparency in the acquisition of German noun plurals. In Kiefer, F., Ladányi, M. & Siptár, P. (eds), Current issues in morphological theory: (ir)regularity, analogy and frequency (pp. 217–236) . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J. & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57) (4, Serial No. 228).Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 209–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimouni, Z., Kehayia, E. & Jarema, G. (1998). The mental representation of singular and plural nouns in Algerian Arabic as revealed through auditory priming in agrammatic aphasic patients. Brain and Language 61, 63–87.Google Scholar
Omar, M. (1973). The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 2(8), 59–108.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. & Ullman, M. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Science 6, 456–63.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1996). Learning from a connectionist model of the English past tense. Cognition 61, 299–308.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K. & Nakisa, R. (1997). A connectionist model of the Arabic plural system. Language and Cognitive Processes 12, 807–36.Google Scholar
Prunet, J., Béland, R. & Idrissi, A. (2000). The mental representation of Semitic words. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 609–48.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, R. (1998). The ‘broken’ plural problem in Arabic and comparative Semitic: allomorphy and analogy in non-concatenative morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ravid, D., Dressler, W. U., Nir-Sagiv, B., Korecky-Kröll, K., Souman, A., Rehfeldt, K., Laaha, S., Bertl, J., Basbøll, H. & Gillis, S. (2008). Core morphology in child directed speech: crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals. In Behrens, H. (ed.), TILAR Series No 6: trends in corpus research, 25–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Farah, R. (1999). Learning about noun plurals in early Palestinian Arabic. First Language 19, 187–206.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Farah, R. (2009). Noun plurals in early Palestinian Arabic: a longitudinal case study. In Stephany, U. and Voeikova, M. D. (eds), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: a cross-linguistic perspective, 411–32. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. & Hayek, L. (2003). Learning about different ways of expressing number in the development of Palestinian Arabic. First Language 23, 41–63.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing. In McClelland, J. & Rumelhart, D. & the PDP Research Group (eds), Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 2: psychological and biological models, 216–71. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., Hadieh, A. & Ravid, D. (2012). Acquiring noun plurals in Palestinian Arabic: morphology, familiarity, and pattern frequency. Language Learning 62(4), 1079–109.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). The acquisition of Russian as a native language. In Smith, F. & Miller, C. A. (Eds.), The genesis of language: a psycholinguistic approach (pp. 129–148) . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. & Slobin, D. (eds), Studies of child language development (pp. 175–208) . New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Strauss, S. (1982). Introduction. In Strauss, S. (ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth, 1–10. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Szagun, G. (2001). Learning different regularities: the acquisition of noun plurals by German-speaking children. First Language 21, 109–41.Google Scholar
Watson, J. (2007). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, J., Kouider, S. & Carey, S. (2009). Acquisition of singular-plural morphology. Developmental Psychology 45(1), 202–6.Google Scholar