Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-17T07:48:49.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

North Atlantic killer whale research; past, present and future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

Andrew D. Foote*
Affiliation:
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Volgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
Sanna Kuningas
Affiliation:
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, UK
Filipa I.P. Samarra
Affiliation:
Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, UK Marine Research Institute, Skulagata 4, PO Box 1390, 121 Reykjavík, Iceland
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A.D. Foote, Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Øster Volgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark email: footead@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Foreword
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

INTRODUCTION

Studying wide-ranging top predators requires a multidisciplinary and transnational approach to efficiently identify population structure, movement patterns, ecology and population parameters for effective monitoring and conservation of the populations. A recent workshop was held at the European Cetacean Society Conference, Galway Ireland, on 25 March 2012, on one of the most wide-ranging of top predators in the North Atlantic, the killer whale Orcinus orca. The workshop had as its main aims, to summarize the current state of knowledge, strengthen cooperation by evaluating the potential to share data and combine field efforts, and discuss the advances to date and future priorities for killer whale research in the North Atlantic. A selection of the presentations from this workshop is included within this special section as well as other contributions that contain relevant information on the status of killer whale research in this broad geographical area. In this Foreword, whilst not attempting to thoroughly review all published work to date, we look back at progress made on understanding the ecology and biology of North Atlantic killer whales, and based on the discussions held at the workshop suggest pressing research questions for the future, in particular highlighting how new methodologies can build upon existing work.

TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF PROGRESS

The 2012 North Atlantic killer whale workshop marked the 25th anniversary of a previous workshop on this topic held in Provincetown, MA, USA. At this time, research on killer whales in the waters of British Columbia, Canada and Washington state, USA had made substantial progress. This was largely due to the pioneering work by the late Dr Michael Bigg, who developed the use of photographs of the dorsal fin and saddle patches to identify individuals, allowing for the first time an annual census and the subsequent analyses of population dynamics, insights into social structure, life history and analyses of site fidelity and movement (Bigg, Reference Bigg1982; Bigg et al., Reference Bigg, Ellis, Ford and Balcomb1987, Reference Bigg, Olesiuk, Ellis, Ford and Balcomb1990; Olesiuk et al., Reference Olesiuk, Bigg and Ellis1990). Dr John Ford, was also reporting the first evidence of a complex pattern of group and population specific call dialects in North Pacific killer whales (Ford & Fisher, Reference Ford and Fisher1982, Reference Ford, Fisher and Payne1983). Inspired by this progress of studies in Pacific waters, the aims of the North Atlantic killer whale workshop in 1987 were to see if by building collaborations between researchers and critically reviewing existing data they could provide a synthesis that would describe distribution, movement, numbers, population structure and ecology of killer whales in the North Atlantic.

Many of the studies presented at the 1987 workshop were published in a special issue of the journal of the Marine Research Institute, Reykjavík, the Rit Fiskideildar (Sigurjónsson & Leatherwood, Reference Sigurjónsson and Leatherwood1988). The majority of these early studies were preliminary investigations of the distribution of killer whales in North Atlantic waters based on sighting data, whaling catch statistics or stranding data (e.g. Christensen, Reference Christensen1988; Evans, Reference Evans1988; Hammond & Lockyer, Reference Hammond and Lockyer1988; Øien, Reference Øien1988). Whilst subject to the biases of occurrence data uncorrected for effort, these reviews identified potential hotspots and seasonality in occurrence and therefore provided the foundations, which subsequent dedicated research could build upon. They also identified some of the major prey resources that killer whales appeared to be tracking in the North Atlantic, which included the Icelandic summer-spawning (ISS) and Norwegian spring-spawning (NSS) stocks of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) (Christensen, Reference Christensen1988; Øien, Reference Øien1988; Sigurjónsson et al., Reference Sigurjónsson, Lyrholm, Leatherwood, Jónsson and Víkingsson1988).

INSIGHTS FROM PHOTO-IDENTIFICATION

At the time of the 1987 workshop, Thomas Lyrholm and colleagues had initiated the first photo-identification studies of killer whales in Norwegian and Icelandic waters. Lyrholm (Reference Lyrholm1988) photographically recaptured a small number of naturally marked individual killer whales between years on the NSS herring wintering grounds in the Lofoten region of Northern Norway, and between Lofoten and the spawning grounds of the NSS herring in the Möre region of Southern Norway. In subsequent years, Dr Tiu Similä and colleagues have built upon this earlier work and expanded the photo-identification catalogue to include close to 600 individuals. They have further demonstrated the association between the movement and site fidelity of killer whales and the migration of the NSS herring stock (Similä et al., Reference Similä, Holst and Christensen1996). By 1987, Sigurjónsson et al. (Reference Sigurjónsson, Lyrholm, Leatherwood, Jónsson and Víkingsson1988) had also photographically recaptured individuals between years on the wintering grounds of the ISS stock of Atlantic herring. Further work carried out by the Marine Research Institute, Reykjavík and others, has found that killer whale groups are also associated with, and to some extent follow the ISS herring stock (Sigurjónsson et al., Reference Sigurjónsson, Lyrholm, Leatherwood, Jónsson and Víkingsson1988; Foote et al., Reference Foote, Similä, Víkingsson and Stevick2010; Samarra et al., Reference Samarra, Fennell, Víkingsson, Pétursson, Foote, Deecke and Miller2012). Killer whales were later also reported feeding on the North Sea stock of Atlantic herring, off the coast of Shetland (Deecke et al., Reference Deecke, Nykänen, Foote and Janik2011), although in much smaller aggregations. Over 1000 individual killer whales have now been photo-identified across the north-east Atlantic and collaboration among institutions has allowed comparisons of photo-identification catalogues over greater spatial and temporal scales. A general pattern is emerging of site fidelity and association with a particular prey resource at several locations across the north-east Atlantic (Foote et al., Reference Foote, Similä, Víkingsson and Stevick2010). However, some groups may switch between different prey resources depending on their seasonal availability (Foote et al., Reference Foote, Similä, Víkingsson and Stevick2010; Vester & Hammerschmidt, Reference Vester and Hammerschmidt2013; Vongraven & Bisther, Reference Vongraven and Bisther2014).

Photo-identification studies in some areas of the North Atlantic arguably face greater logistical challenges than those faced by colleagues working during the summer months in the relatively sheltered nearshore waters of British Columbia and Washington State. The densest occurrences of North Atlantic killer whales during the 1980s and 1990s were in the fjords of the Lofoten region of northern Norway and off eastern Iceland where the NSS and ISS herring stocks over-wintered. During winter, at these high latitudes, there are few hours of daylight in which photography could successfully capture the scars and nicks on the saddle patch and dorsal fin of killer whales necessary to identify them. Additionally, the sheer numbers of killer whales aggregated on the herring wintering grounds meant that only a proportion of them could be photo-identified within a season, in contrast to the almost complete annual census of all individuals being conducted on some Pacific killer whale populations. However, by applying mark–recapture models that account for the potential biases in such a dataset, a study presented in this special section has been able to use the long-term photo-identification dataset from northern Norway to estimate population size, survival and reproductive rates and compare these parameters with populations in the North Pacific and a population from the Crozet Archipelago in the southern Indian Ocean (Kuningas et al., Reference Kuningas, Similä and Hammond2014). Similarly, off Iceland, distance-sampling methods were used across a large survey area, which also estimated large numbers of killer whales in these waters (Gunnlaugsson & Sigurjónsson, Reference Gunnlaugsson and Sigurjónsson1989; Sigurjónsson et al., Reference Sigurjónsson, Gunnlaugsson, Ensor, Newcomer and Víkingsson1991).

INSIGHTS FROM BEHAVIOURAL STUDIES

These logistical difficulties meant that the research on Norwegian killer whales to some extent shifted focus during the 1990s to the behavioural techniques used by the killer whales when foraging for herring. Arguably for the first time, the North Atlantic researchers became the pioneers of new approaches to study killer whales. Dr Tiu Similä and colleagues used underwater cameras and sonar, multi-hydrophone arrays and custom-built multi-sensor acoustic tags to record the movement and behaviour of killer whales during what has become known as carousel feeding (Similä & Ugarte, Reference Similä and Ugarte1993; Similä, Reference Similä1997; Nøttestad & Axelsen, Reference Nøttestad and Axelsen1999; Simon et al., Reference Simon, Wahlberg, Ugarte and Miller2005; Shapiro, Reference Shapiro2008). During carousel feeding the killer whales appear to work as a coordinated group, encircling a ball of herring whilst flashing their white undersides and releasing bubbles to herd a ball of herring from the school before tail slapping the ball to stun and then eat individual herring (Similä & Ugarte, Reference Similä and Ugarte1993).

INSIGHTS FROM ACOUSTIC RECORDINGS

It is during feeding on herring that killer whales in the waters of Norway, Iceland and Shetland are most vocally active (van Opzeeland et al., Reference van Opzeeland, Corkeron, Leyssen, Similä and Van Parijs2005; Simon et al., Reference Simon, McGregor and Ugarte2007; Deecke et al., Reference Deecke, Nykänen, Foote and Janik2011). Killer whales feeding on herring off Iceland and Shetland produce a distinctive low frequency pulsed call just prior to tail slapping the herring (Simon et al., Reference Simon, Ugarte, Wahlberg and Miller2006; Deecke et al., Reference Deecke, Nykänen, Foote and Janik2011). The low frequency of the call may resonate the herring's swim bladder and therefore help herd the herring (Simon et al., Reference Simon, Ugarte, Wahlberg and Miller2006). This ‘herding’ call has not been recorded off Norway to date. However, distinctive ultrasonic whistles have been recorded from killer whales feeding on herring around Iceland, Shetland and Norway (Samarra et al., Reference Samarra, Deecke, Vinding, Rasmussen, Swift and Miller2010a). These recent findings on the acoustic behaviour build on earlier work published in the Rit Fiskideildar special issue (Sigurjónsson & Leatherwood, Reference Sigurjónsson and Leatherwood1988). Those early studies provided the first descriptions of Norwegian and Icelandic killer whale call repertoires and found preliminary evidence of group-specific repertoires, but only tentative evidence for some call sharing between Iceland and Norway (Moore et al., Reference Moore, Francine, Bowles and Ford1988; Strager, Reference Strager1995). Since then, considerably larger acoustic datasets have been gathered and work is currently underway to conduct a broader geographical comparison of the call repertoire of north-east Atlantic killer whales (Samarra, Deecke and Miller, unpublished data).

INSIGHTS FROM GENETIC DATA

Further light has been shed on the relationship between Icelandic and Norwegian herring-eating killer whales by genetic investigations. Early genetic studies typically used DNA from captive Icelandic killer whales as outgroups for studies focused on North Pacific killer whales (e.g. Stevens et al., Reference Stevens, Duffield, Asper, Hewlett, Bolz, Gage and Bossart1989). Only recently, have studies used larger sample sizes from across the North Atlantic using both mitochondrial and nuclear genetic markers. Allele frequencies of 17 polymorphic microsatellite loci indicated individuals from the Norwegian and Icelandic herring grounds were a single panmictic population; however, there was significant differentiation between the two regions based on mitochondrial DNA (Foote et al., Reference Foote, Vilstrup, de Stephanis, Verborgh, Abel Nielsen, Deaville, Kleivane, Martin, Miller, Øien, Perez-Gil, Rasmussen, Reid, Robertson, Rogan, Simila, Tejedor, Vester, Vikingsson, Willerslev, Gilbert and Piertney2011). Stable isotope ratios differed significantly between Icelandic and Norwegian killer whales assigned to this panmictic population, suggesting some differences in ecology, such as spatial distribution or trophic position (Foote et al., Reference Foote, Vester, Víkingsson and Newton2012). A synthesis of these investigations highlights the benefits of a multi-disciplinary approach, especially when different markers give a signal of differentiation or connectivity over different timescales. The emerging picture, based on multiple markers (e.g. acoustic, genetic, isotope and photographic markers), is that the killer whales that forage for herring around Iceland, Shetland and Norway originate from a recent common ancestral lineage, which diverged to follow different stocks of Atlantic herring, but that male-mediated gene flow still occurs among killer whale lineages when these herring stocks spatially and temporally overlap (Foote et al., Reference Foote, Vilstrup, de Stephanis, Verborgh, Abel Nielsen, Deaville, Kleivane, Martin, Miller, Øien, Perez-Gil, Rasmussen, Reid, Robertson, Rogan, Simila, Tejedor, Vester, Vikingsson, Willerslev, Gilbert and Piertney2011).

Genetic studies have also provided evidence of recent trans-oceanic and trans-equatorial migration, with mitogenome haplotypes that cluster with the North Pacific ‘offshore’ ecotype being found off Newfoundland and haplotypes related to Antarctic ‘type A’ killer whales found off the coasts of Scotland, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Canary Islands (Morin et al., Reference Morin, Archer, Foote, Vilstrup, Allen, Wade, Durban, Parsons, Pitman, Li, Bouffard, Abel Nielsen, Rasmussen, Willerslev, Gilbert and Harkins2010; Foote et al., Reference Foote, Vilstrup, de Stephanis, Verborgh, Abel Nielsen, Deaville, Kleivane, Martin, Miller, Øien, Perez-Gil, Rasmussen, Reid, Robertson, Rogan, Simila, Tejedor, Vester, Vikingsson, Willerslev, Gilbert and Piertney2011).

OPPORTUNISTIC RESEARCH

While the predictable seasonal aggregations close to shore in some parts of the north-east Atlantic have enabled dedicated fieldwork and the set-up of long-term studies, in other parts of the North Atlantic sightings are sparse and sporadic and a more opportunistic approach to data collection is often required. Reeves & Mitchell (Reference Reeves and Mitchell1988a) identified areas across the North Atlantic where killer whale sightings and takes by American pelagic whalers were high. Many localized studies are now conducted on a variety of cetaceans within the pelagic waters of this region, e.g. the Azores, the Canary Islands, Strait of Gibraltar, West Africa, Bahamas and Caribbean, and local researchers collect data on killer whales when they encounter them (Weir et al., Reference Weir, Collins, Carvalho and Rosenbaum2010; Dunn & Claridge, Reference Dunn and Claridge2014; Esteban et al., Reference Esteban, Verborgh, Gauffier, Gimenez-Verdugo, Afan, Cañadas, García, Magalhães, Andreu and De Stephanis2014). Photo-identification data and even the first biopsy samples are being collected across the mid-Atlantic. Several groups conducting these studies were present at the 2012 Galway workshop and presented their sightings data. The workshop provided a platform for them to form a working group and share photo-identification data to facilitate matching between study sites. Many of the killer whales photographed in the mid-Atlantic have distinctive cookie cutter shark (Isistius brasiliensis) bite marks on the dorsal fin and saddle patch and Xenobalanus barnacles trailing from the dorsal fin. Given that cookie cutter sharks and Xenobalanus barnacles are warm water species and neither shark bites nor barnacles have been reported on whales north of the Iberian Peninsula suggests there may be groups resident in the lower latitude waters of the North Atlantic. An interesting study on killer whales in the Bahamas presents a valuable long-term data set of observations suggesting some localized site fidelity and even foraging preferences (Dunn & Claridge, Reference Dunn and Claridge2014). Populations in more northerly pelagic waters are also becoming accessible for behavioural observations, photo-identification and even biopsy sampling due to increased collaboration with the pelagic fishing industry and the use of these opportunistic platforms for research (Luque et al., Reference Luque, Davis, Reid, Wang and Pierce2006; Foote et al., Reference Foote, Similä, Víkingsson and Stevick2010, Reference Foote, Vilstrup, de Stephanis, Verborgh, Abel Nielsen, Deaville, Kleivane, Martin, Miller, Øien, Perez-Gil, Rasmussen, Reid, Robertson, Rogan, Simila, Tejedor, Vester, Vikingsson, Willerslev, Gilbert and Piertney2011).

THE NORTH-WEST ATLANTIC AND CANADIAN ARCTIC

Whilst studies of the north-west Atlantic and Canadian Arctic were well represented in the 1988 special issue of the Rit Fiskideildar on North Atlantic killer whales (Lien et al., Reference Lien, Stenson and Jones1988; Mitchell & Reeves, Reference Mitchell and Reeves1988; Reeves & Mitchell, Reference Reeves and Mitchell1988b), subsequent research in these waters lagged behind the progress made in the north-east Atlantic until the relatively recent work by Steve Ferguson and colleagues. They have employed the use of tried and tested methods, in addition to developing novel and highly innovative approaches to investigate the ecology of killer whales in the rapidly changing ecosystem of the Canadian Arctic (e.g. Higdon et al., Reference Higdon, Westdal and Ferguson2014). As global temperatures rise and the Arctic sea ice retreats, many former ‘choke points’ are opening up and allowing killer whales to enter the bays and inlets of the Canadian Arctic; resulting in a significant increase in recent sightings (Higdon & Ferguson, Reference Higdon and Ferguson2009). Interviews with local Inuit hunters suggest that marine mammals are the main prey of killer whales in the Canadian Arctic (Ferguson et al., Reference Ferguson, Higdon and Westdal2012; Higdon et al., Reference Higdon, Westdal and Ferguson2014). Killer whales are known to be able to have a population level effect on prey populations due to top down effects, and therefore have the potential to significantly shape this rapidly changing Arctic ecosystem (Higdon & Ferguson, Reference Higdon and Ferguson2009; Higdon et al., Reference Higdon, Westdal and Ferguson2014). An important question that needs to be addressed to better understand the potential impact of killer whale predation is how persistent it is over time. Satellite tracks of a tagged killer whale found that it moved between areas with known aggregations of marine mammals before heading out in to the open North Atlantic in late autumn as the sea ice increased in concentration in the inlets (Matthews et al., Reference Matthews, Lugue, Petersen, Andrews and Ferguson2011). Therefore, predation on Arctic marine mammals may be seasonal; in this special issue, Matthews and colleagues shed further light on the diet of Canadian Arctic killer whales using stable isotope from tooth growth layer groups which suggest individuals in this region may be associated with different food webs (Matthews & Ferguson, Reference Matthews and Ferguson2014). This special section also contains the first in-depth review of killer whale ecology in the north-west Atlantic for 25 years (Lawson & Stevens, Reference Lawson and Stevens2014), and some useful clues that humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae calves may be more regularly on the menu of killer whales in the north-west than in the north-east Atlantic (McCordic et al., Reference McCordic, Todd and Stevick2014).

DATA SHARING AND COLLABORATIVE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH

This brief summary of the past 25 years of research on North Atlantic killer whales shows how much has been learned about these animals, despite the logistical difficulties in studying them (Figure 1; Table 1). In many cases the success of the research hinged on multi-national and institutional collaborations and data sharing. As noted above, one of the aims of the North Atlantic killer whale workshop in Galway 2012, was to facilitate the sharing of data and build upon existing collaborations. Initial efforts on sharing of data had begun with the creation of a North Atlantic Killer Whale ID Project, however this was still limited to only partial datasets from a few areas in the north-east Atlantic. In this digital age it is much easier to store, copy and share photographic images and sound recordings. It also facilitates the use of opportunistic data collection, for example the use of photographs collected by members of the public (Beck et al., Reference Beck, Foote, Kötter, Harries, Mandleberg, Stevick, Whooley and Durban2014) and we anticipate an increase in this so-called ‘Citizen Science’ (Tweddle et al., Reference Tweddle, Robinson, Pocock and Roy2012) as a monitoring tool for killer whales. We strongly recommend digitization of past photographic and acoustic data and that this should be archived at a suitable institute or online database. Similarly, genetic data should be stored on publicly accessible databases such as GenBank and the National Science Foundation-sponsored Dryad archive at http://datadryad.org (Whitlock et al., Reference Whitlock, McPeek, Rausher, Rieseberg and Moore2010). This ensures that data remain available after the initial study is complete.

Fig. 1. Locations of dedicated and opportunistic research conducted on North Atlantic killer whales. Further details are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Description of studies conducted on North Atlantic killer whales by location. The table includes the nature of the study, type of data collected, duration of data collection and example publications arising from each location. Sampling locations (‘Map Point’) refer to Figure 1. This list is by no means exhaustive. References: 1. Christensen (Reference Christensen1988); 2. Lyrholm (Reference Lyrholm1988); 3. Øien, (Reference Øien1988); 4. Similä & Ugarte (Reference Similä and Ugarte1993); 5. Strager (Reference Strager1995); 6. Similä et al. (Reference Similä, Holst and Christensen1996); 7. Similä (Reference Similä1997); 8. Kuningas et al. (Reference Kuningas, Similä and Hammond2014); 9. Moore et al. (Reference Moore, Francine, Bowles and Ford1988); 10. Sigurjónsson et al. (Reference Sigurjónsson, Lyrholm, Leatherwood, Jónsson and Víkingsson1988); 11. Simon et al. (Reference Simon, Ugarte, Wahlberg and Miller2006); 12. Samarra et al. (Reference Samarra, Deecke, Vinding, Rasmussen, Swift and Miller2010a); 13. Hoelzel et al. (Reference Hoelzel, Natoli, Dahlheim, Olavarria, Baird and Black2002); 14. Cañadas & de Stephanis (Reference Cañadas, de Stephanis, Reeves and Notarbartolo di Sciara2006); 15. Esteban-Pavo (Reference Esteban-Pavo2008); 16. Esteban et al. (Reference Esteban, Verborgh, Gauffier, Gimenez-Verdugo, Afan, Cañadas, García, Magalhães, Andreu and De Stephanis2014); 17. Bolt et al. (Reference Bolt, Harvey, Mandleberg and Foote2009); 18. Foote et al. (Reference Foote, Similä, Víkingsson and Stevick2010); 19. Deecke et al. (Reference Deecke, Nykänen, Foote and Janik2011); 20. Beck et al. (Reference Beck, Kuningas, Esteban-Pavo and Foote2012); 21. Beck et al. (Reference Beck, Foote, Kötter, Harries, Mandleberg, Stevick, Whooley and Durban2014); 22. Reid et al. (Reference Reid, Evans and Northridge2003); 23. Luque et al. (Reference Luque, Davis, Reid, Wang and Pierce2006); 24. Foote et al. (Reference Foote, Vilstrup, de Stephanis, Verborgh, Abel Nielsen, Deaville, Kleivane, Martin, Miller, Øien, Perez-Gil, Rasmussen, Reid, Robertson, Rogan, Simila, Tejedor, Vester, Vikingsson, Willerslev, Gilbert and Piertney2011); 25. Bloch & Lockyer (Reference Bloch and Lockyer1988); 26. Heide-Jørgensen (Reference Heide-Jørgensen1988); 27. Hammond & Lockyer (Reference Hammond and Lockyer1988); 28. Lien et al. (Reference Lien, Stenson and Jones1988); 29. Mitchell & Reeves (Reference Mitchell and Reeves1988); 30. Reeves & Mitchell (Reference Reeves and Mitchell1988b); 31. Higdon & Ferguson (Reference Higdon and Ferguson2009); 32. Matthews et al. (Reference Matthews, Lugue, Petersen, Andrews and Ferguson2011); 33. Ferguson et al. (Reference Ferguson, Higdon and Westdal2012); 34. Higdon et al. (Reference Higdon, Westdal and Ferguson2014); 35. Matthews & Ferguson (Reference Matthews and Ferguson2014); 36. Lawson & Stevens (Reference Lawson and Stevens2014); 37. Dunn & Claridge (Reference Dunn and Claridge2014).

The effectiveness of these large shared datasets was recently demonstrated in an unusual scenario, when a young killer whale became stranded off the coast of The Netherlands. No photo-identification matches were made, but sequencing of informative regions of the mitochondrial genome suggested that the whale belonged to the lineages that follow the NSS herring. This was then further supported by the matching of several stereotyped call types produced by the whale and those recorded by groups feeding on herring in northern Norway (Samarra et al., Reference Samarra, Duc and Miller2010b). Whilst the completeness of photo-identification, genetic and acoustic repertoire sampling of North Atlantic killer whales still lags behind the North Pacific, this case study demonstrates that it has come a remarkably long way in the past 25 years. The data collected over the past 25 years also provide important insights into conservation priorities at the population level. The different markers (e.g. photo-identification, acoustics, genetics, morphology and stable isotopes) provide a basis for delineating ‘management units’, i.e. populations that are demographically isolated and so population size depends upon births and deaths rather than immigration (e.g. Beck et al., Reference Beck, Foote, Kötter, Harries, Mandleberg, Stevick, Whooley and Durban2014; Kuningas et al., Reference Kuningas, Similä and Hammond2014). The long-term and ongoing collection of photo-identification data then allows us to quantify these population parameters within each management unit (e.g. Kuningas et al., Reference Kuningas, Similä and Hammond2014) and to detect trends such as declines (e.g. Beck et al., Reference Beck, Foote, Kötter, Harries, Mandleberg, Stevick, Whooley and Durban2014). Lastly, the behavioural and dietary studies allow us to better understand the ecology of each population and therefore better determine which population-level threats they might be exposed to. A good example of this is the IUCN-listed threatened population of killer whales in the Strait of Gibraltar (Cañadas & de Stephanis, Reference Cañadas, de Stephanis, Reeves and Notarbartolo di Sciara2006). Over a decade of dedicated research by the organization CIRCE has identified a population decline concurrent with a decrease in the blue fin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) stock, which they have also identified as the killer whale population's main prey resource (Esteban-Pavo, Reference Esteban-Pavo2008). The threatened status of the killer whale population in the Strait of Gibraltar was discussed during the 2012 workshop and conservation measures recommended by CIRCE were endorsed by the workshop attendees.

ANTICIPATED PROGRESS DURING THE NEXT 25 YEARS?

We look forward with eager anticipation to the next 25 years of research on North Atlantic killer whales. We predict that the recent methodological advances in DNA sequencing technology, which have already been harnessed to sequence a dataset of complete mitochondrial genomes for North Atlantic killer whales (Morin et al., Reference Morin, Archer, Foote, Vilstrup, Allen, Wade, Durban, Parsons, Pitman, Li, Bouffard, Abel Nielsen, Rasmussen, Willerslev, Gilbert and Harkins2010; Foote et al., Reference Foote, Vilstrup, de Stephanis, Verborgh, Abel Nielsen, Deaville, Kleivane, Martin, Miller, Øien, Perez-Gil, Rasmussen, Reid, Robertson, Rogan, Simila, Tejedor, Vester, Vikingsson, Willerslev, Gilbert and Piertney2011), will be further applied to produce a complementary nuclear genomic dataset. The first high coverage marine mammal genomes have now been sequenced and the data made publicly available and these include a North Atlantic killer whale. This genomic data will allow the comparisons of natural selection upon the genome among populations. The large acoustic datasets that have been collected for the past 25 years have allowed us to better understand the acoustic behaviour of north-east Atlantic killer whales. We anticipate that work currently undertaken will allow for broader geographical comparisons as well as better understanding of the function of different signals, such as the still little understood high-frequency whistles. In addition, recent projects deploying state-of-the-art multi-sensor tags in different locations in the north-east Atlantic promise to allow for detailed comparisons of behavioural parameters. We expect that together these developments will improve our understanding of the biology, behaviour and ecology of killer whales in the North Atlantic.

Finally, the past 25 years have seen global temperatures rise, including in the North Atlantic (Lyman et al., Reference Lyman, Good, Gouretski, Ishii, Johnson, Palmer, Smith and Willis2010), and these changes have had biological consequences across a range of taxa (Hughes, Reference Hughes2000). As noted above, diminishing sea ice has led to a significant increase in killer whale sightings in the Canadian Arctic during this period. There have also been natural shifts in the distribution of prey resources, e.g. the NSS and ISS herring stocks and north-east Atlantic mackerel stock, and subsequently the killer whale lineages that follow them (Kuningas et al., Reference Kuningas, Kvadsheim, Lam and Miller2013). The next 25 years will likely lead to further and more rapid changes in climate, particularly in the Arctic as the sea ice melts (Screen & Simmonds, Reference Screen and Simmonds2010). We therefore predict that the prey resources exploited by North Atlantic killer whales will shift their distribution and may undergo declines or increases as a result. Additionally, new prey resources may become available to North Atlantic killer whales. Although our understanding of killer whale ecology and evolution has come a long way in the last 25 years, there are still many gaps in our knowledge of the extent of geographical movements and consequently connectivity between different locations, the prey preferences and diet composition, the population viability and status of killer whales in different locations in the North Atlantic. Without such information it is impossible to completely critically assess the threats faced by killer whales in these locations and their conservation status. Collaboration between researchers and long-term consistent monitoring effort will be critical to effectively assess these issues. The ecosystems of the North Atlantic are likely to be highly dynamic during the next 25 years, and both North Atlantic killer whales and the researchers that investigate them will need to adapt to these ongoing changes and challenges.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank all the participants and presenters of the 2012 workshop in Galway for their contributions to discussions, particularly Pauline Gauffier and Steve Ferguson for joining us on the workshop discussion panel. We are greatly indebted to the organizers (GMIT and IWDG) of the 2012 European Cetacean Society conference for facilitating the workshop. We would particularly like to thank all those that have further contributed to this special issue and helping to further the current knowledge about killer whales around the North Atlantic. We are very grateful to Dr Ann Pulsford, the Executive Editor of the JMBA, for her diligent hard work and help with organizing this special section. Three anonymous referees provided useful comments that improved this Foreword. Lastly, we would like to thank our mentor, Tiu Similä, for her support.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

A.D.F. was supported by an EU Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship, S.K. was supported by a studentship through the University of St Andrews and SMRU ltd and FIPS by a START Postdoctoral Fellowship of The Icelandic Research Fund (i. Rannsóknasjóður).

References

Beck, S., Foote, A.D., Kötter, S., Harries, O., Mandleberg, L., Stevick, P.T., Whooley, P. and Durban, J.W. (2014) Using opportunistic photo-identifications to detect a population decline of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in British and Irish waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/S0025315413001124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S., Kuningas, S., Esteban-Pavo, R. and Foote, A.D. (2012) The influence of ecology on sociality in the killer whale (Orcinus orca). Behavioural Ecology 23, 246253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigg, M. (1982) An assessment of killer whale (Orcinus orca) stocks off Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Report of the International Whaling Commission 32, 5666.Google Scholar
Bigg, M.A., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K. and Balcomb, K.C. (1987) Killer whales: a study of their identification, genealogy, and natural history in British Columbia and Washington State. Nanaimo: Phantom Press.Google Scholar
Bigg, M.A., Olesiuk, P.F., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B. and Balcomb, K.C. (1990) Social organization and genealogy of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the coastal waters of British Columbia and Washington State. Report of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 12, 383405.Google Scholar
Bloch, D. and Lockyer, C. (1988) Killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Faroese waters. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 5564.Google Scholar
Bolt, H.E., Harvey, P.V., Mandleberg, L. and Foote, A.D. (2009) Occurrence of killer whales in Scottish inshore waters: temporal and spatial patterns relative to the distribution of declining harbour seal populations. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19, 671675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cañadas, A. and de Stephanis, R. (2006) Killer whale, or Orca Orcinus orca (Strait of Gibraltar subpopulation). In Reeves, R.R. and Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. (eds) The status and distribution of cetaceans in the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. Malaga, Spain: IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, pp. 3438.Google Scholar
Christensen, I. (1988) Distribution, movements and abundance of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Norwegian coastal waters, 1982–1987, based on questionnaire surveys. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 7988.Google Scholar
Deecke, V.B., Nykänen, M., Foote, A.D. and Janik, V.M. (2011) Vocal behaviour and feeding ecology of killer whales Orcinus orca around Shetland, UK. Aquatic Biology 13, 7988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, C. and Claridge, D. (2014) Killer whale (Orcinus orca) occurrence and predation in The Bahamas. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/S0025315413000908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteban, R., Verborgh, P., Gauffier, P., Gimenez-Verdugo, J., Afan, I., Cañadas, A., García, P., Magalhães, S., Andreu, E. and De Stephanis, R. (2014) Distribution of killer whales at southern Iberian Peninsula. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/S002531541300091X.Google Scholar
Esteban-Pavo, R. (2008) Abundancia, Estructura social y Parámetros de Historia Natural de la orca (Orcinus orca) en el Estrecho de Gibraltar. MSc thesis. University of Cadiz, Spain.Google Scholar
Evans, P.G.H. (1988) Killer whales (Orcinus orca) in British and Irish waters. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 4254.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S.H., Higdon, J.W. and Westdal, K.H. (2012) Prey items and predation behavior of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Nunavut, Canada based on Inuit hunter interviews. Aquatic Biosystems 8, 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foote, A.D., Similä, T., Víkingsson, G.A. and Stevick, P.T. (2010) Movement, site fidelity and connectivity in a top marine predator, the killer whale. Evolutionary Ecology 24, 803814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, A.D., Vester, H., Víkingsson, G.A. and Newton, J. (2012) Dietary variation within and between populations of northeast Atlantic killer whales, Orcinus orca, inferred from δ13C and δ15N analyses. Marine Mammal Science 28, E472E485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, A.D., Vilstrup, J.T., de Stephanis, R., Verborgh, P., Abel Nielsen, S.C., Deaville, R., Kleivane, L., Martin, V., Miller, P.J.O., Øien, N., Perez-Gil, M., Rasmussen, M., Reid, R.J., Robertson, K.M., Rogan, E., Simila, T., Tejedor, M.L., Vester, H., Vikingsson, G.A., Willerslev, E., Gilbert, M.T.P. and Piertney, S.B. (2011) Genetic differentiation among North Atlantic killer whale populations. Molecular Ecology 20, 629641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, J.K. and Fisher, H.D. (1982) Killer whale (Orcinus orca) dialects as an indicator of stocks in British Columbia. Report of the International Whaling Commission 32, 671679.Google Scholar
Ford, J.K.B. and Fisher, H.D. (1983) Group-specific dialects of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in British Columbia. In Payne, R. (ed.) Communication and behavior of whales. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, pp. 129161.Google Scholar
Gunnlaugsson, T. and Sigurjónsson, J. (1989) NASS-87: estimation of whale abundance based on observations made onboard Icelandic and Faroese survey vessels ship-board. Report of the International Whaling Commission 40, 571580.Google Scholar
Hammond, P.S. and Lockyer, C. (1988) Distribution of killer whales in the eastern North Atlantic. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 2441.Google Scholar
Heide-Jørgensen, M.P. (1988) Occurrence and hunting of killer whales in Greenland. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 115135.Google Scholar
Higdon, J.W. and Ferguson, S.H. (2009) Loss of Arctic sea ice causing punctuated change in sightings of killer whales (Orcinus orca) over the past century. Ecological Applications 19, 13651375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higdon, J.W., Westdal, K.H. and Ferguson, S.H. (2014) Distribution and abundance of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Nunavut, Canada—an Inuit knowledge survey. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/S0025315413000921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoelzel, A.R., Natoli, A., Dahlheim, M.E., Olavarria, C., Baird, R.W. and Black, N. (2002) Low worldwide genetic diversity in the killer whale (Orcinus orca): implications for demographic history. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 269, 14671473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, L. (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, 5661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuningas, S., Kvadsheim, P., Lam, F-P.A. and Miller, P.J.O. (2013) Killer whale presence in relation to naval sonar activity and prey abundance in northern Norway. ICES Journal of Marine Science. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fst127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuningas, S., Similä, T. and Hammond, P.S. (2014) Population size, survival and reproductive rates of northern Norwegian killer whales (Orcinus orca) in 1986–2003. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/S0025315413000933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, J.W. and Stevens, T.S. (2014). Historic and seasonal distribution patterns and abundance of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the northwest Atlantic. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi:10.1017/S0025315413001409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, J., Stenson, G.B. and Jones, P.W. (1988) Killer whales (Orcinus orca) in waters off Newfoundland and Labrador, 1978–1986. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 194201.Google Scholar
Luque, P.L., Davis, C.G., Reid, D.G., Wang, J. and Pierce, G.J. (2006) Opportunistic sightings of killer whales from Scottish pelagic trawlers fishing for mackerel and herring off North Scotland (UK) between 2000 and 2006. Aquatic Living Resources 19, 403410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, J.M., Good, S.A., Gouretski, V.V., Ishii, M., Johnson, G.C., Palmer, M.D., Smith, D.M., and Willis, J.K. (2010) Robust warming of the global upper ocean. Nature 465, 334337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyrholm, T. (1988) Photoidentification of individual killer whales, Orcinus orca, off the coast of Norway, 1983–1986. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 8998.Google Scholar
Matthews, C.J.D. and Ferguson, S.H. (2014) Dietary specialization among eastern Canadian Arctic/Northwest Atlantic killer whales (Orcinus orca) inferred from d15N and d13C in teeth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi: 10.1017/S0025315413001379.Google Scholar
Matthews, C.J.D., Lugue, S.P., Petersen, S.D., Andrews, R.D. and Ferguson, S.H. (2011) Satellite tracking of killer whale (Orcinus orca) in the eastern Canadian Arctic documents ice avoidance and rapid, long-distance movement into the North Atlantic. Polar Biology 34, 10911096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCordic, J.A., Todd, S.K. and Stevick, P.T. (2014) Differential rates of killer whale attacks on humpback whales in the North Atlantic as determined by scarification. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi: 10.1017/S0025315413001008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. and Reeves, R.R. (1988) Records of killer whales in the western North Atlantic, with emphasis on eastern Canadian waters. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 160193.Google Scholar
Moore, S.E., Francine, J.K., Bowles, A.E. and Ford, J.K.B. (1988) Analysis of calls of killer whales, Orcinus orca, from Iceland and Norway. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 225250.Google Scholar
Morin, P.A., Archer, F.I., Foote, A.D., Vilstrup, J., Allen, E.E., Wade, P., Durban, J., Parsons, K., Pitman, R., Li, L., Bouffard, P., Abel Nielsen, S.C., Rasmussen, M., Willerslev, E., Gilbert, M.T.P. and Harkins, T. (2010) Complete mitochondrial genome phylogeographic analysis of killer whales (Orcinus orca) indicates multiple species. Genome Research 20, 908916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nøttestad, L. and Axelsen, B.E. (1999) Herring schooling manoeuvres in response to killer whale attacks. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 15401546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Øien, N. (1988) The distribution of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the North Atlantic based on Norwegian catches, 1938–1981, and incidental sightings, 1967–1987. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 6578.Google Scholar
Olesiuk, P.F., Bigg, M.A. and Ellis, G.M. (1990) Life history and population dynamics of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the coastal waters of British Columbia and Washington State. Report of the International Whaling Commission, Special Issue 12, 209243.Google Scholar
van Opzeeland, I.C., Corkeron, P.J., Leyssen, T., Similä, T. and Van Parijs, S.M. (2005) Acoustic behaviour of Norwegian killer whales, Orcinus orca, during carousel and seiner foraging on spring-spawning herring. Aquatic Mammals 31, 110119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, R.R. and Mitchell, E. (1988a) Killer whale sightings and takes by American pelagic whalers in the North Atlantic. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 723.Google Scholar
Reeves, R.R. and Mitchell, E. (1988b) Distribution and seasonality of killer whales in the eastern Canadian Arctic. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 136160.Google Scholar
Reid, J.B., Evans, P.G.H. and Northridge, S.P. (2003) Atlas of cetacean distribution in North-west European waters. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Samarra, F.I.P., Deecke, V.B., Vinding, K., Rasmussen, M.H., Swift, R.J. and Miller, P.J.O. (2010a) Killer whales (Orcinus orca) produce ultrasonic whistles. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128, EL205EL210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samarra, F.I.P., Duc, A. and Miller, P.J.O. (2010b) Identification of Morgan's discrete stereotyped call repertoire and matching to sounds recorded from wild North Atlantic killer whales. Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
Samarra, F.I.P., Fennell, A., Víkingsson, G.A., Pétursson, H., Foote, A., Deecke, V. and Miller, P.J.O. (2012) Movements of individually identified killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Icelandic waters. Poster presented at The 26th Annual Conference of the European Cetacean Society, Galway, Ireland.Google Scholar
Screen, J.A. and Simmonds, I. (2010) The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification. Nature 464, 13341337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, A.D. (2008) Orchestration: the movement and vocal behavior of free-ranging Norwegian killer whales (Orcinus orca). PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Massachusetts, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurjónsson, J., Gunnlaugsson, T., Ensor, P., Newcomer, M. and Víkingsson, G. (1991) North Atlantic Sightings Survey 1989 (NASS-89): ship-board sighting surveys in Icelandic and adjacent waters July–August 1989. Report of the International Whaling Commission 41, 559572.Google Scholar
Sigurjónsson, J. and Leatherwood, S. (1988) North Atlantic killer whales. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 1316.Google Scholar
Sigurjónsson, J., Lyrholm, T., Leatherwood, S., Jónsson, E. and Víkingsson, G. (1988) Photoidentification of killer whales, Orcinus orca, off Iceland, 1981 through 1986. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 99114.Google Scholar
Similä, T. (1997) Sonar observations of killer whales (Orcinus orca) feeding on herring schools. Aquatic Mammals 23, 119126.Google Scholar
Similä, T., Holst, J.C. and Christensen, I. (1996) Occurrence and diet of killer whales in northern Norway: seasonal patterns relative to the distribution and abundance of Norwegian spring-spawning herring. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53, 769779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Similä, T. and Ugarte, F. (1993) Surface and underwater observations of cooperatively feeding killer whales in northern Norway. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71, 14941499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, M., McGregor, P.K. and Ugarte, F. (2007) The relationship between the acoustic behaviour and surface activity of killer whales (Orcinus orca) that feed on herring (Clupea harengus). Acta Ethologica 10, 4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, M., Ugarte, F., Wahlberg, M. and Miller, L.A. (2006) Icelandic killer whales Orcinus orca use a pulsed call suitable for manipulating the schooling behaviour of herring Clupea harengus. Bioacoustics 26, 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, M., Wahlberg, M., Ugarte, F. and Miller, L.A. (2005) Acoustic characteristics of underwater tail slaps used by Norwegian and Icelandic killer whales (Orcinus orca) to debilitate herring (Clupea harengus). Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 24592466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, T.A., Duffield, D.A., Asper, E.D., Hewlett, K.G., Bolz, A., Gage, L.J. and Bossart, G.D. (1989) Preliminary findings of restriction fragment differences in mitochondrial DNA among killer whales (Orcinus orca). Canadian Journal of Zoology 67, 25922595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strager, H. (1995) Pod-specific call repertoires and compound calls of killer whales, Orcinus orca Linnaeus, 1758, in the waters of northern Norway. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 10371047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweddle, J.C., Robinson, L.D., Pocock, M.J.O. and Roy, H.E. (2012) Guide to citizen science: developing, implementing and evaluating citizen science to study biodiversity and the environment in the UK. Natural History Museum and NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology for UK-EOF. Available online: http://www.ukeof.org.uk.Google Scholar
Vester, H. and Hammerschmidt, K. (2013) First record of killer whales (Orcinus orca) feeding on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in northern Norway suggest a multi-prey feeding type. Marine Biodiversity Records 6, e9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1755267212001030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vongraven, D. and Bisther, A. (2014) Prey switching by killer whales in the north-east Atlantic: observational evidence and experimental insights. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi: 10.1017/S0025315413001707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, C.R., Collins, T., Carvalho, I. and Rosenbaum, H.C. (2010) Killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Angolan and Gulf of Guinea waters, tropical West Africa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 16011611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, M.C., McPeek, M.A., Rausher, M.D., Rieseberg, L. and Moore, A.J. (2010) Data archiving. American Naturalist 175, 145146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Locations of dedicated and opportunistic research conducted on North Atlantic killer whales. Further details are given in Table 1.

Figure 1

Table 1. Description of studies conducted on North Atlantic killer whales by location. The table includes the nature of the study, type of data collected, duration of data collection and example publications arising from each location. Sampling locations (‘Map Point’) refer to Figure 1. This list is by no means exhaustive. References: 1. Christensen (1988); 2. Lyrholm (1988); 3. Øien, (1988); 4. Similä & Ugarte (1993); 5. Strager (1995); 6. Similä et al. (1996); 7. Similä (1997); 8. Kuningas et al. (2014); 9. Moore et al. (1988); 10. Sigurjónsson et al. (1988); 11. Simon et al. (2006); 12. Samarra et al. (2010a); 13. Hoelzel et al. (2002); 14. Cañadas & de Stephanis (2006); 15. Esteban-Pavo (2008); 16. Esteban et al. (2014); 17. Bolt et al. (2009); 18. Foote et al. (2010); 19. Deecke et al. (2011); 20. Beck et al. (2012); 21. Beck et al. (2014); 22. Reid et al. (2003); 23. Luque et al. (2006); 24. Foote et al. (2011); 25. Bloch & Lockyer (1988); 26. Heide-Jørgensen (1988); 27. Hammond & Lockyer (1988); 28. Lien et al. (1988); 29. Mitchell & Reeves (1988); 30. Reeves & Mitchell (1988b); 31. Higdon & Ferguson (2009); 32. Matthews et al. (2011); 33. Ferguson et al. (2012); 34. Higdon et al. (2014); 35. Matthews & Ferguson (2014); 36. Lawson & Stevens (2014); 37. Dunn & Claridge (2014).