Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:04:34.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Future of Democratic Reform in Turkey: Constitutional Moment or Constitutional Process?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2014

Firat Cengiz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Turkey is undergoing the most substantial constitutional reform process in its history, at the same time as carrying out significant peace talks with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party. These two processes will have profound effects on the country’s future governance. Most importantly, the processes could contribute to bridging gaps in Turkey’s polarized society. As the processes take place in secret, their substantive contents are currently unknown. This article provides a critical analysis of the processes in the light of the new theory of constitutionalism, paying particular attention to the changing role of the European Union in Turkey’s reform discussions. This analysis leads to some sceptical conclusions: given the secrecy, exclusiveness and political hostility surrounding the processes, it seems that they are unlikely to achieve their potential. In addition, despite its contradictions, the weakening of European Union conditionality appears to have negatively affected the reform process.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 682 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Firat Cengiz is a Lecturer in Law and a Marie Curie Fellow at the Liverpool School of Law and Social Justice. Contact email: firat.cengiz@liverpool.ac.uk.

References

Ackerman, B. (1991), We the People: Foundations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (1998), ‘Revolution on a Human Scale’, Yale Law Journal, 108(8): 2279–2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aktar, C. (2013), ‘Artık gündem başkanlık’, Taraf, 1 January, www.taraf.com.tr/cengiz-aktar/makale-artik-gundem-baskanlik.htm.Google Scholar
Albertus, M. and Menaldo, V. (2012), ‘Dictators as Founding Fathers? The Role of Constitutions under Autocracy’, Economics & Politics, 24(3): 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L. (2011), ‘What Are Constitutions and What Should (and Can) They Do?’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 28(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Amato, A. (2010), ‘Democratic Constitution-making and Unfreezing the Turkish Process’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 36: 473–487.Google Scholar
Bahçeli, T. and Noel, S. (2011), ‘The Justice and Development Party and the Kurdish Question’, in M. Casier and J. Jongerden (eds), Nationalism and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue (New York: Routledge): 101–120.Google Scholar
BBC News (2013), ‘Police Clear Istanbul’s Gezi Park after Erdogan Warning’, BBC News, 16 June, www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-22922697.Google Scholar
Casier, M., Jongerden, J. and Walker, N. (2011), ‘Fruitless Attempts? The Kurdish Initiative and Containment of the Kurdish Movement in Turkey’, New Perspectives on Turkey, 44: 103–127.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F. (2013), ‘The EU’s Fading Influence over Turkey is Weakening the Country’s Democratic Reform Processes’, blog, 14 May, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/05/14/eu-turkey-democratic-reform-kurdish-minority-constitution-firat-cengiz.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F. (2014), ‘Rethinking Conditionality: Gender Equality and the Kurdish Issue in Turkey’s EU Accession Framework’, in F. Cengiz and L. Hoffmann (eds), Turkey and the European Union – Facing New Challenges and Opportunities (New York: Routledge): 156–177.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F. and Hoffmann, L. (2011), ‘Parliamentary Crisis: Imprisoned Politicians in Turkey’, Open Democracy, 8 July, www.opendemocracy.net/firat-cengiz-lars-hoffmann/parliamentary-crisis-imprisoned-politicians-in-turkey.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F. and Hoffmann, L. (2012), ‘The 2011 General Elections in Turkey: Potential Implications on Domestic and International Politics in the Shadow of a Discourse Change?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1): 255–269.Google Scholar
Cengiz, F. and Hoffmann, L. (2013), ‘Rethinking Conditionality: Turkey’s European Union Accession and the Kurdish Question’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(3): 416–432.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (2000), On Democracy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Dodrowolsky, A. and Hart, V. (2003), ‘Introduction: Women, New Politics and Constitutional Change’, in A. Dodrowolsky and V. Hart (eds), Women Making Constitutions (New York: Palgrave Macmillan): 1–19.Google Scholar
The Economist (2011), ‘AK All over Again’, The Economist, 16 June, www.economist.com/node/18836458.Google Scholar
The Economist (2012a), ‘Turkey and the Kurds – Hunger and Thirst’, The Economist, 17 November, www.economist.com/news/europe/21566666-hunger-strike-causes-new-tension-between-turkey-and-its-kurds-hunger-and-thirst.Google Scholar
The Economist (2012b), ‘Turkey, Syria and the Kurds – South by South-east’, The Economist, 20 October, www.economist.com/news/europe/21564870-fiercely-anti-assad-stance-turkey-taking-syria-aggravating-long-running-troubles.Google Scholar
Elkins, Z. (2010), ‘Diffusion and Constitutionalization of Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 43: 969–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, M. and Yazıcı, S. (2011), ‘Towards Turkey’s New Constitution’, TESEV (Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation), www.tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/341774d7-7e6f-4078-9149-445ede629d51/TESEV%20Report%20on%20TR%20Constitution.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (1998, 2011, 2012 and 2013), Staff Working Document – Turkey Progress Report (Brussels: European Commission).Google Scholar
European Council (2001, 2003, 2006, 2008), Decision on the Principles, Priorities and Conditions Contained in the Accession Partnership with the Republic of Turkey (Brussels: European Council).Google Scholar
Evans, A.J. (2009), ‘Constitutional Moments in Eastern Europe and Subjectivist Political Economy’, Constitutional Political Economy, 20: 118–138.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J.S. (2011), ‘Deliberative Democracy and Constitutions’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 28(1): 242–260.Google Scholar
Forbath, W.E. (1999), ‘Constitutional Change and Politics of History’, Yale Law Journal, 108(8): 1917–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaystarnews (2012), ‘Turkey Rejects Protection for Gay Rights’, Gaystarnews, 14 September, www.gaystarnews.com/article/turkey-rejects-protection-gay-rights140912.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Elkins, Z. and Blount, J. (2009), ‘Does the Process of Constitution-making Matter?’, Annual Review of Law and Political Science, 5(1): 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Guardian (2013), ‘PKK Begins to Withdraw from Turkey’, The Guardian, 8 May, www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/08/pkk-begins-withdraw-turkey.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. (1967), The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Hart, V. (2001), ‘Constitution-making and the Transformation of Conflict’, Peace and Change, 26(2): 153–176.Google Scholar
Hart, V. (2003), Democratic Constitution Making, United States Institute of Peace Special Report 107 (Washington, DC), www.usip.org/sites/default/files/sr107.pdf.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2010), ‘Protesting as a Terrorist Offense’, www.hrw.org/reports/2010/11/01/protesting-terrorist-offense-0.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1987), Of Civil Liberty (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund), www.econlib.org/library/LFBooks/Hume/hmMPL.html (first published 1742).Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (2012), ‘Turkey: The PKK and a Kurdish Settlement’, International Crisis Group, 11 September, www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/europe/turkey-cyprus/turkey/219-turkey-the-pkk-and-a-kurdish-settlement.aspx.Google Scholar
Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2011), ‘The Turkish–EU Odyssey and Political Regime Change in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, 16(2): 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2009), General Theory of Law and State (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers) (first published 1949).Google Scholar
Kentel, F., Köker, L. and Genç, Ö. (2012a), Making of a New Constitution in Turkey, Monitoring Report October 2011–January 2012, TESEV (Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation), www.tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/ca56e382-a62b-4e40-b36b-3f7014875215/ENGanayasaizleme1_18_10_12.pdf.Google Scholar
Kentel, F., Uçum, M. and Genç, Ö. (2012b), Yeni Anayasa Sürecini İzleme Raporu, Şubat-Haziran 2012, TESEV (Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation), www.tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/9387e8a5-de70-4bb2-a326-9d2e681df432/Anayasaizleme2_08_10_12.pdf.Google Scholar
Kirişci, K. (2011), ‘The Kurdish Issue in Turkey: Limits of European Union Reform’, South European Society and Politics, 16(2): 335–349.Google Scholar
Kirişci, K. (2014), ‘The Arab Spring and Regional Integration: Can the European Union and Turkey Co-operate?’, in F. Cengiz and L. Hoffmann (eds), Turkey and the European Union – Facing New Challenges and Opportunities (New York: Routledge): 64–81.Google Scholar
Kubicek, P. (2005), ‘The European Union and Grassroots Democratization in Turkey’, Turkish Studies, 6(3): 361–377.Google Scholar
Kubicek, P. (2011), ‘Political Conditionality and European Union’s Cultivation of Democracy in Turkey’, Democratization, 18(4): 910–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurban, D. (2003), ‘Confronting Equality: The Need for Constitutional Protection of Minorities on Turkey’s Path to the European Union’, Columbia Human Rights Review, 35: 151–214.Google Scholar
Kurban, D. and Ensaroğlu, Y. (2010), Toward a Solution to the Kurdish Question: Constitutional and Legal Recommendations, TESEV (Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation), www.tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/004aebe2-5a6f-4365-9a00-1e2bbcf1da43/Toward%20a%20Solution%20to%20the%20Kurdish%20Question%20-%20FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Lerner, H. (2010), ‘Constitution-writing in Deeply Divided Societies: the Incrementalist Approach’, Nations and Nationalism, 16(1): 68–88.Google Scholar
Lerner, H. (2011), Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mahçupyan, E., Uçum, M. and Genç, Ö. (2013), Yeni Anayasa Sürecini İzleme Raporu 3: Nasıl Bir Anayasaya Doğru Gidiyoruz? – Mart 2013, TESEV (Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation), www.tesev.org.tr/yeni-anayasa-surecini-izleme-raporu-3--nasil-bir-anayasaya-dogru-gidiyoruz---mart-2013/Icerik/429.html.Google Scholar
McEvoy, K. and Morison, J. (2002), ‘Beyond the “Constitutional Moment”: Law, Transition, and Peacemaking in Northern Ireland’, Fordham International Law Journal, 26: 961–995.Google Scholar
McLaren, L. and Cop, B. (2011), ‘The Failure of Democracy in Turkey: A Comparative Analysis’, Government and Opposition, 46(4): 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öniş, Z. (2012), ‘Turkey and the Arab Spring: Between Ethics and Self-interest’, Insight Turkey, 14(3): 45–63.Google Scholar
Öniş, Z. (2013), Turkey and the Arab Revolutions: Boundaries of Regional Power Influence in a Turbulent Middle East, Social Science Research Network Working Paper (July), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2298536.Google Scholar
Posner, D.N. and Young, D.J. (2007), ‘The Institutionalization of Political Power in Africa’, Journal of Democracy, 18(3): 126–140.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.J. (2008), The Social Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press) (first published 1762).Google Scholar
Sadurski, W. (2012), Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Stasavage, D. (2007), ‘Polarization and Publicity: Rethinking the Benefits of Deliberative Democracy’, Journal of Politics, 69(1): 59–72.Google Scholar
T24 (2012), ‘Anayasa çalışmalarında kaç madde görüşüldü, kaç maddede anlaşıldı?’, 9 December, http://t24.com.tr/haber/anayasa-calismalarinda-kac-madde-gorusuldu-kac-maddede-anlasildi/219292.Google Scholar
T24 (2013), ‘Baskın Oran: İktidar barış sürecini paçavra gibi buruşturup attı!’, 18 June, http://t24.com.tr/haber/baskin-oran-iktidar-baris-surecini-pacavra-gibi-burusturup-atti/232256.Google Scholar
Tanör, B. (2012), 1982 Anayasasına Göre Türk Anayasa Hukuku (Ankara: Beta Yayınları).Google Scholar
TESEV (Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation) (2012), ‘Anayasaya Dair Tanım ve Beklentiler’, www.tesev.org.tr/Upload/Publication/0f2d3c0e-0668-46c3-b4a9-786275208f85/12602AnayasaAnket14_11_12WEB.pdf.Google Scholar
Toprak, B., Bozan, I., Morgül, T. and Şener, N. (2009), Being Different in Turkey: Religion, Conservatism and Otherization (Istanbul: Open Society Foundation, Boğaziçi University).Google Scholar
Turkey Peace Council (2012), Submission to the Turkish Parliament’s Conciliatory Committee drafting a new constitution (in Turkish), www.turkiyebarismeclisi.com/temelmetinler/turkiye-buyuk-millet-meclisi-baskanligi-anayasa-uzlasma-komisyonuna-sunulan-metin/94.Google Scholar
TÜSİAD (Turkish Industry and Business Association) (2011), ‘Yeni Anayasanın Beş Temel Boyutu’, www.tusiad.org/__rsc/shared/file/YENI-ANAYASA-YUVARLAK-MASA.pdf.Google Scholar
Varol, O.O. (2012), ‘The Democratic Coup d’État’, Harvard International Law Journal, 53(2): 292–356.Google Scholar
Wiener, A. and Della Sala, V. (1997), ‘Constitution-making and Citizenship Practice: Bridging the Democracy Gap in the EU?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 35: 597–598.Google Scholar
Yetkin, M. (2012), ‘Turkish Universities are Heating Up’, Hürriyet Daily News, 28 December, www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkish-universities-are-heating-up.aspx?pageID=238&nid=37822.Google Scholar