Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:43:09.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual Impersonation — Population Registration, Reference Books and Identification in the Eastern Cape, 1950s–1960s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2014

Lorena Rizzo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper looks at the population registration and issuing of reference books in the Transkei in the 1950s and 1960s. The dompas became the iconic object of apartheid policing within the logic of urban racial segregation and capitalist labour exploitation. The analysis proposed here investigates population registration through the lens of materiality and visuality. It sketches the visual economies that facilitated the scheme in a rural area and explores the role of photography in one of apartheid’s most notorious administrative schemes. Along the lines of Walter Benjamin’s reflections on technological mediation the paper retraces how the dompas as an image/object oscillated between panoptic surveillance and subaltern contestation.

Résumé

Cet article concerne le recensement de population et l’émission de documents d’identité (“reference books”) au Transkei dans les années ’50 et ’60. Le dompas devint un objet iconique du contrôle politique de l’apartheid dans une logique de ségrégation raciale urbaine et d’exploitation capitaliste du travail. L’analyse ici proposée s’oriente sur le recensement de la population à travers le filtre de la matérialité et de la visualité. Elle ébauche les économies visuelles qui facilitèrent la mise en place de ce système en milieu rural et explore le rôle de la photographie dans un des systèmes administratifs de l’apartheid les plus connus. Dans le sillage des réflexions de Walter Benjamin sur la médiation technologique, cet article montre comment le dompas en tant qu’image/objet oscilla entre surveillance panoptique et contestation “par le bas.”

Type
New Sources for South African History
Information
History in Africa , Volume 41 , June 2014 , pp. 221 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appadurai, Arjun, “The Colonial Backdrop,” Afterimage (March/April 1997), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Marcus, and Vokes, Richard, “Introduction: Anthropology, Photography and the Archive,” History and Anthropology 21–4 (2010), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Walter, “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility,”www.lcst2120.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/work-of-art.pdf, accessed on 10 August 2013.Google Scholar
Bratu-Hansen, Miriam, “Benjamin’s Aura,” Critical Inquiry 34 (2008), 336–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breckenridge, Keith, “Verwoerd’s Bureau of Proof: Total Information in the Making of Apartheid,” History Workshop Journal 59 (2005), 83–108.Google Scholar
Brooks, Pamela E., Boycotts, Buses, and Passes. Black Women’s Resistance in the US South and South Africa (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Buckley, Liam M., “Cine-film, Film-strips and the Devolution of Colonial Photography in The Gambia,” History of Photography 34–2 (2010), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Simon A., Suspect Identities. A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification (Cambridge MA/London: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Edwards, Elisabeth, Raw Histories. Photography, Anthropology, Museums (Oxford/New York: Berg, 2001).Google Scholar
Elo, Mika, “Walter Benjamin on Photography: Towards Elemental Politics,” Transformations 15 (2007), n.p.Google Scholar
Ernst, Wolfgang, Digital Memory and the Archive (Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugard, Athol, Township Plays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Gandhi, Leela, Postcolonial Theory. A Critical Introduction (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter, “The Theatre of Emblems: On the Optical Apparatus and the Investiture of Persons,” Law, Culture and The Humanities 8–1 (2012), 47–67.Google Scholar
Hayes, Patricia, “Power, Secrecy, Proximity: A Short History of South African Photography,” Kronos 33 (2007), 139–162.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Sean, “Coloured Categories. Review of Mohamed Adhikari, Not White Enough, Not Black Enough: Racial Identity in the South African Coloured Community,” H-South Africa, H-Net Review, May 2007.Google Scholar
Legassick, Martin, The Struggle for the Eastern Cape 1800–1854. Subjugation and the Roots of South African Democracy ( Johannesburg: KMM Review Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Minkley, Gary, “‘How, in Heaven’s Name, Are These People to Provide Photographs for Themselves?’ The Intimate Photographic Event, the Provision of Politics and the Encounter of an ‘Empire of Love’ in South Africa,” (unpublished conference paper, n.d.).Google Scholar
Pinney, Christopher, The Coming of Photography in India (London: The British Library, 2008).Google Scholar
Pinney, Christopher, Photography and Anthropology (London: Reaktion Books, 2011).Google Scholar
Poole, Deborah, Vision, Race, Modernity: A Visual Economy of the Andean Image World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posel, Deborah, Influx Control and the Construction of Apartheid (Oxford: University of Oxford Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Rizzo, Lorena, “Visual Aperture. Bureaucratic Systems of Identification, Photography and Personhood in Colonial Southern Africa,” History of Photography 37–3 (2013), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint, Lily, “Reading Subjects: Passbooks, Literature and Apartheid,” Social Dynamics 38–1 (2012), 117–133.Google Scholar
Sher, Mark, “From Dompas to Disc: the Legal Control of Migrant Labour,” in: Davis, Dennis and Slabbert, Mana (eds.), Crime and Power in South Africa: Critical Studies in Criminology (Cape Town: David Philip, 1985), 72–89.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann L., “‘In Cold Blood:’ Hierarchies of Credibility and the Politics of Colonial Narratives,” Representations 37 (1992), 151–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, Ann L, Along the Archival Grain. Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Trouillot, Michel R., Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Vokes, Richard, Photography in Africa: Ethnographic Perspectives (Woodbridge/Suffolk/London: James Currey, 2012).Google Scholar
Wells, Julia C., We Now Demand: The History of Women’s Resistance to Pass Laws in South Africa (Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
White, Hayden, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Wu, Cynthia, “Review of Tina Chen, Double Agency: Acts of Impersonation in Asian and American Literature and Culture,” Journal of Asian American Studies 9–2 (2006), 209–212.Google Scholar
Yudelman, David, and Jeeves, Alan, “New Labour Frontiers for Old: Black Migrants to the South African Gold Mines, 1920–85,” Journal of Southern African Studies 13–1 (1986), 101–124.Google Scholar