Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:18:05.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Swedish national adoption study of criminality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2013

K. S. Kendler ,
S. Larsson Lönn ,
N. A. Morris ,
J. Sundquist ,
N. Långström  and
K. Sundquist
K. S. Kendler*
Affiliation:
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
S. Larsson Lönn
Affiliation:
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
N. A. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Criminal Justice, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
J. Sundquist
Affiliation:
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
N. Långström
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
K. Sundquist
Affiliation:
Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: K. S. Kendler, M.D., Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics of VCU, Box 980126, Richmond, VA 23298-0126, USA. (Email: kendler@vcu.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

To clarify the role of genetic and environmental factors in criminal behavior (CB), we examined all CB and violent and non-violent subtypes (VCB and NVCB, respectively) in a Swedish national sample of adoptees and their relatives.

Method

CB was defined by a conviction in the Swedish Crime Register with standard definitions for VCB and NVCB subtypes. We examined adoptees born 1950–1991 (n = 18 070) and their biological (n = 79 206) and adoptive (n = 47 311) relatives.

Results

The risk for all CB was significantly elevated in the adopted-away offspring of biological parents of which at least one had CB [odds ratio (OR) 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–1.6] and in the biological full and half-siblings of CB adoptees (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.6 and OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2–1.3, respectively). A genetic risk index (including biological parental/sibling history of CB and alcohol abuse) and an environmental risk index (including adoptive parental and sibling CB and a history of adoptive parental divorce, death, and medical illness) both strongly predicted probability of CB. These genetic and environmental risk indices acted additively on adoptee risk for CB. Moderate specificity was seen in the transmission of genetic risk for VCB and NVCB between biological parents and siblings and adoptees.

Conclusions

CB is etiologically complex and influenced by a range of genetic risk factors including a specific liability to CB and a vulnerability to broader externalizing behaviors, and by features of the adoptive environment including parental CB, divorce and death. Genetic risk factors for VCB and NVCB may be at least partially distinct.

Keywords

Adoption studiescrimeenvironmentgeneticsnon-violent crimeSwedenviolent crime
Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 44 , Issue 9 , July 2014 , pp. 1913 - 1925
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaver, KM (2011). Genetic influences on being processed through the criminal justice system: results from a sample of adoptees. Biological Psychiatry 69, 282–287.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, A, Lindahl, M, Plug, E (2006). The origins of intergenerational associations: lessons from Swedish adoption data. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121, 999–1028.Google Scholar
Bohman, M (1970). Adopted Children and Their Families: A Follow-up Study of Adopted Children, Their Background, Environment and Adjustment. Proprius: Stockholm.Google Scholar
Bohman, M (1978). Some genetic aspects of alcoholism and criminality. A population of adoptees. Archives of General Psychiatry 35, 269–276.Google Scholar
Burt, SA (2012). How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions. Clinical Psychology Review 32, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, SC (1925). The Young Delinquent. University of London Press: London.Google Scholar
Christiansen, KO (1974), Seriousness of criminality and concordance among Danish twins. In Crime, Criminology and Public Policy (ed. Hood, R.), pp. 63–77. The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
Crowe, RR (1972). The adopted offspring of women criminal offenders. A study of their arrest records. Archives of General Psychiatry 27, 600–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalgard, O, Kringlen, E (1976). A Norwegian twin study of criminality. British Journal of Criminality 16, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiden, RD, Edwards, EP, Leonard, KE (2007). A conceptual model from the development of externalizing behavior problems among kindergarten children of alcoholic families: role of parenting and children's self-regulation. Developmental Psychology 43, 1187–1201.Google Scholar
Farrington, DP, Gundry, G, West, DJ (1975). The familial transmission of criminality. Medicine Science Law 15, 177–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonagy, P, Target, M, Steele, M, Steele, H (1998). The development of violence and crime as it relates to security of attachment. In Children in a Violent Society (ed. Osofsky, J. D.), pp. 150–177. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Frisell, T, Lichtenstein, P, Långström, N (2011). Violent crime runs in families: a total population study of 12.5 million individuals. Psychological Medicine 41, 97–105.Google Scholar
Gabrielli, WF Jr, Mednick, SA (1984). Urban environment, genetics, and crime. Criminology 22, 645–652.Google Scholar
Glueck, S, Glueck, ET (1950). Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency, 1st edn. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Goetting, A (1994). The parenting–crime connection. Journal of Primary Prevention 14, 169.Google Scholar
Hawkins, JD, Herrenkohl, T, Farrington, DP, Brewer, D, Catalano, RF, Harachi, TW (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions (ed. Loeber, R. and Farrington, D. P.), pp. 106–146. Sage Publications, Inc.: London.Google Scholar
Henry, B, Caspi, A, Moffitt, TE, Silva, PA (1996). Temperamental and familial predictors of violent and nonviolent criminal convictions: age 3 to age 18. Developmental Psychology 32, 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjalmarsson, R, Lindquist, MJ (2013). The origins of intergenerational associations in crime: lessons from Swedish adoption data. Labour Economics 20, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendler, KS, Sundquist, K, Ohlsson, H, Palmer, K, Maes, H, Winkleby, MA, Sundquist, J (2012). Genetic and familial–environmental influences on risk for drug abuse: a national Swedish adoption study. Archives of General Psychiatry 69, 690–697.Google Scholar
Lange, J (1929). Verbrechen als Schicksal: Studien an Kriminellen Zwillingen [Crime as Destiny: A Study on Criminal Twins] . Thieme: Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lilly, JR, Cullen, FT, Ball, RA (2010). Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences, 5th edn. Sage Publications, Inc.: London.Google Scholar
Loeber, R, Wung, P, Keenan, K, Giroux, B, Stouthamer-Loeber, M, Van Kammen, WB, Maughan, B (1993). Developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior. Development and Psychopathology 5, 1103–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, D, Frick, P (1994). The heritability of antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 16, 301–323.Google Scholar
Mednick, SA, Gabrielli, WF Jr, Hutchings, B (1984). Genetic influences in criminal convictions: evidence from an adoption cohort. Science 224, 891–894.Google Scholar
Moffitt, TE (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychology Review 100, 674–701.Google Scholar
Nagin, D, Tremblay, RE (1999). Trajectories of boys’ physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Development 70, 1181–1196.Google Scholar
Raine, A (1993). The Psychopathology of Crime: Criminal Behavior as a Clinical Disorder. Academic Press: San Diego.Google Scholar
Raine, A, Brennan, P, Mednick, SA (1994). Birth complications combined with early maternal rejection at age 1 year predispose to violent crime at age 18 years. Archives of General Psychiatry 51, 984–988.Google Scholar
Rhee, SH, Waldman, ID (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin 128, 490–529.Google Scholar
Rosanoff, AJ, Handy, LM, Plesset, IR (1934). Criminality and delinquency in twins. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 24, 923–934.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2007). SAS OnlineDoc® 9.2. SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Scher, KJ (1991). Children of Alcoholics: A Critical Appraisal of Theory and Research. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
Sigvardsson, S, Bohman, M, Cloninger, CR (1987). Structure and stability of childhood personality: prediction of later social adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2, 929–946.Google Scholar
Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (2008). Victims' Tendency to Report Crime, Report 2008:12. Brottsförebyggande rådet: Stockholm.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, SG, Piquero, AR (1999). The influence of gender, low birth weight, and disadvantaged environment in predicting early onset of offending: a test of Moffitt's interactional hypothesis. Criminology 37, 843–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar