Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T01:38:08.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Age of Constitutions in the Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2014

Extract

The late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries have been aptly called the “Age of Codifications.” The same period was also the Age of Constitutions. Although a great deal is known about the migration of prenational and transnational legal sources and ideas that led to national codes of civil and criminal law in Europe and the Americas, much less is known about similar processes on the constitutional level. Constitutional historians have been more parochial than their private law counterparts, most likely because of the relationship between constitutions and nations. In the light of independence, nations immediately needed constitutions to solidify gains and to consolidate state power. The study of these processes becomes national narratives, often in conversation with the former colonial power, which are disconnected from more general or regional trends. As Linda Colley's article in this issue illustrates, it is important to step back to view the constitution-making process from an Atlantic perspective that ties the Americas, North and South, into the area of study. The Age of Constitutions in the Americas must include Latin America and the Caribbean.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bellomo, Manlio (trans. Cochrane, Lydia G.), The Common Legal Past of Europe 1000–1800, 2nd ed. (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1995), 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. The practice of close textual analysis in European private law shifted seamlessly to legal history to provide detailed lineages of code provisions from Roman law, the ius commune, iura propria, and doctrinal works. See, for example, Guzmán–Brito, Alejandro, Codificación del derecho civil e interpretación de las leyes: Las normas sobre interpretación de las leyes en los principales Códigos civiles europeo-occidentales y americanos emitidos hasta fines del siglo xix (Madrid: Iustel, 2011)Google Scholar.

3. But see Alberdi, Juan Bautista, Bases y puntos de partida para la organización política de la república argentina (Valparaíso: Imprenta del Mercurio, 1852; Buenos Aires: Ciudad Argentina, 1998)Google Scholar. Alberdi prepared a critical and comparative analysis of the region's constitutions as a step towards the Argentine Constitution of 1853. He was particularly keen on the Constitution of California of 1849. Ibid, 44–47 (1998).

4. Colley, Linda, “Empires of Writing: Britain, America and Constitutions, 1776–1848,” Law and History Review 32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Benton, Lauren and Ross, Richard J., “Empires and Legal Pluralism: Jurisdiction, Sovereignty, and Political Imagination in the Early Modern World,” in Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850, ed. Benton, Lauren and Ross, Richard J. (New York: New York University Press, 2013), 117Google Scholar.

6. Benton, Lauren, Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 79Google Scholar.

7. Benton, Lauren, A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar, 39, 103, 105, 279.

8. Dale, Elizabeth, “Reconsidering the Seventeenth Century: Legal History in the Americas,” in A Companion to American Legal History, ed. Hadden, Sally E. and Brophy, Alfred L. (London: Blackwell, 2013), 7Google Scholar.

9. Tomlins, Christopher L. and Mann, Bruce H., eds., The Many Legalities of Early America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001)Google Scholar; and Ross, Richard J., “Legal Communications and Imperial Governance: British North America and Spanish America Compared,” in Cambridge History of Law in America, ed. Grossberg, Michael and Tomlins, Christopher (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) 1:104–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Cottrol, Robert J., The Long, Lingering Shadow: Slavery, Race, and Law in the American Hemisphere (Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

11. See, for example, the discussion of the centrality of jurisdiction as it relates to the Spanish Constitution of Cádiz of 1812. Sariñera, Marta Lorente, La nación y las españas: Representación y territorio en el constitucionalismo gaditano (Madrid: UAM Ediciones, 2010), 1214Google Scholar; and Garriga, Carlos and Lorente, Marta, eds., Cádiz, 1812: La constitución jurisdiccional (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2007)Google Scholar.

12. In light of the contagion analogy, perhaps terms such as “transplant,” “borrowing,” and “migration,” should be abandoned in favor of practices borrowed from epidemiology, so that the legal historian will undertake constitutional outbreak analysis using articles of constitutions and drafters' notes to identify marker constitutional strands. See Bailyn, Bernard, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1967), 230319Google Scholar, ch. 6, “The Contagion of Liberty”.

13. See, for example, Armitage, David, The Declaration of Independence: A Global History (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Palmer, R.R., The Age of Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800, 2 vols. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959–1964)Google Scholar; and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay and Armitage, David, eds. The Age of Revolutions in Global Context, c.1760–1840 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010)Google Scholar as cited in Colley, “Empires of Writing,” Law and History Review, 32 (2014)Google Scholar. Therefore, this period was the Age of Codifications, the Age of Constitutions, and the Age of Revolutions.

14. Billias, George Athan, American Constitutionalism Heard Round the World, 1776–1989: A Global Perspective (New York: New York University Press, 2009), xiCrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also, Buergenthal, Thomas, Laguardia, Jorge Mario García, and Rocafort, Rodolfo Piza, La constitución norteamericana y su influencia en latinoamérica (200 años 1787–1987) (San José, Costa Rica: CAPEL, 1987)Google Scholar.

15. Billias, American Constitutionalism, 9, 376.

16. Billias, American Constitutionalism, 53–175.

17. Colley, “Empires of Writing,” Law and History Review, 32 (2014)Google Scholar.

18. Colley, “Empires of Writing,” Law and History Review, 32 (2014)Google Scholar. For Bentham and Latin America see, generally, Bentham, Jeremy (ed. Schofield, Philip), Colonies, Commerce, and Constitutional Law: Rid Yourselves of Ultramaria and other Writings on Spain and Spanish America (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Bentham, Jeremias, Propuesta de código a todas las naciones que profesan opiniones liberales (Londres: Ed. Taylor, 1822)Google Scholar; and Williford, Miriam, Jeremy Bentham on Spanish America: An Account of his Letters and Proposals to the New World (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1980)Google Scholar.

19. Suanzes–Carpegna, Joaquín Varela, Tres ensayos sobre historia constitucional (Lima: Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega Cuadernos del Rectorado, 2008), 87–88, 127131Google Scholar.

20. Sarasola, Ignacio Fernández, La Constitución española de 1812 y su proyección europea e iberoamericana (Alicante: Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, 2004)Google Scholarhttp://www.cervantesvirtual.com/FichaObra.html?Ref=12956&portal=56. See, generally, Thornhill, Chris, A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 205230CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21. Simón Bolívar, Discurso ante el Congreso de Angostura, in Signés, Miguel Acosta, Introducción a Simón Bolívar (México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 1983), 93Google Scholar. (Mirow's translation).

22. Fernández Sarasola, La Constitución española, n. 57. See also, Figueroa, Dante, “Twenty-one Theses on the Legal Legacy of the French Revolution in Latin America,” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 39 (2010): 39120Google Scholar (asserting that the French Revolution was “the catalyst for the new Latin American nations' failings upon their independence.” Ibid. 116.).

23. See, generally, Mirow, Matthew C., “Visions of Cádiz: The Constitution of 1812 in Historical and Constitutional ThoughtStudies in Law, Politics, and Society 53 (2010): 5988. The recent bicentennial of this constitution has produced a sizeable amount of scholarship and numerous international symposia. Fernando Reviriego Picón, La Constitución Española de 1812. Biliografía http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra-visor/constitucion-de-cadiz-de-1812-bibliografia--0/html/000e1ed6-82b2-11df-acc7-002185ce6064_2.html#I_2_; Benjamín González Alonso, “Presentación,” Anuario de Historia del Derecho Español 81 (2011): 9–10; Thomas Duve, “Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht in Latein-amerika im Licht des bicenteriario: Einleitung zur Debatte,” Rechtsgeschichte 16 (2010): 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24. Bilder, Mary Sarah, The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

25. See, for example, Chust, Manuel, La cuestión nacional americana en las Cortes de Cádiz (Alzira: Centro Francisco Tomás y Valiente, 1999)Google Scholar; Michel, Rafael Estrada, Monarquía y nación entre Cádiz y Nueva España (México: Editorial Porrúa, 2006)Google Scholar; Franco, Antonio-Filiu, Cuba en los orígenes del constitucionalismo español: La alternativa descentralizadora (1808–1837) (Zaragoza: Fundación Manuel Giménez Abad, 2011)Google Scholar; Frasquet, Ivana, Las caras del águila: Del liberalismo gaditano a la república federal mexicana (1820–1824) (Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I, 2008)Google Scholar; and Rodríguez, Mario, The Cádiz Experiment in Central America, 1808–1826 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978)Google Scholar. But also see Gargarella, Roberto, Latin American Constitutionalism 1810–2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 119Google Scholar (placing the “‘foundational period’ of Latin American constitutionalism” in the mid-nineteenth century. Ibid, ix.)

26. Mirow, M. C., “The Constitution of Cádiz in Florida,” Florida Journal of International Law 24 (2012): 271329Google Scholar.

27. Rieu–Millan, Marie Laure, Los diputados americanos en las Cortes de Cádiz (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1990), 408Google Scholar.

28. Contreras, José Enciso, “Correspondencia de don José Miguel Gordoa, diputado a las Cortes de Cádiz, con la provincia de Zacatecas, 1811–1814,” Anuario Mexicano de Historia del Derecho 22 (2010): 177–78Google Scholar.

29. Gargarella, Latin American Constitutionalism, 2–3.

30. Ledesma, Manuel Pérez, “Las Cortes de Cádiz y la sociedad española,” in Las Cortes de Cádiz, ed. Artola, Miguel (Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2003), 184Google Scholar; and Rieu–Millan, Los diputados americanos, 151, 155. See, generally, Ferrer, Ada, “Haiti, Free Soil, and Antislavery in the Revolutionary Atlantic,” American Historical Review 117 (2012): 4066CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Ferñandez, Juan Marchena, “El día que los negros cantaron la marsellesa. El fracaso del liberalismo español en América, 1790–1823,” Historia Caribe 2 (2002): 5375Google Scholar.

31. Colley, “Empires of Writing,” Law and History Review 32 (2014)Google Scholar quoting Hulsebosch, Daniel, Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2005), 4Google Scholar. (Mirow's changes are in italics.) See, for example, Mirow, M. C., “Pre-Constitutional Law and Constitutions: Spanish Colonial Law and the Constitution of Cádiz,” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 12 (2013): 313–37Google Scholar.