Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:36:49.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Properties of Graphene Nanowiggles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

R. A. Bizao
Affiliation:
Applied Physics Department, State University of Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas-SP, Brazil
T. Botari
Affiliation:
Applied Physics Department, State University of Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas-SP, Brazil
D. S. Galvao
Affiliation:
Applied Physics Department, State University of Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas-SP, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

In this work we have investigated the mechanical properties and fracture patterns of some graphene nanowiggles (GNWs). Graphene nanoribbons are finite graphene segments with a large aspect ratio, while GNWs are nonaligned periodic repetitions of graphene nanoribbons. We have carried out fully atomistic molecular dynamics simulations using a reactive force field (ReaxFF), as implemented in the LAMPPS (Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator) code. Our results showed that the GNW fracture patterns are strongly dependent on the nanoribbon topology and present an interesting behavior, since some narrow sheets have larger ultimate failure strain values. This can be explained by the fact that narrow nanoribbons have more angular freedom when compared to wider ones, which can create a more efficient way to accumulate and to dissipate strain/stress. We have also observed the formation of linear atomic chains (LACs) and some structural defect reconstructions during the material rupture. The reported graphene failure patterns, where zigzag/armchair edge terminated graphene structures are fractured along armchair/zigzag lines, were not observed in the GNW analyzed cases.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Novoselov, K. S. et al. ., Science 306, 666 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geim, A. K. and Novoselov, K. S., Nature Materials 6,183 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. et al. ., Nano Lett. 12, 293 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deretzis, I. and Magna, A. La, Eur. Phys. J. B 81, 15 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J. et al. ., Nature 466, 470 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girao, E. C. et al. ., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 135501 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girao, E. C. et al. ., Phy. Rev. B 85, 235431 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duin, A. C. T. van, et al. ., J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9396 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimpton, S., J. Comp. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, M. Z. S., Autreto, P. A. S., Legoas, S. B., and Galvao, D. S., Nanotechnology 20, 465704 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paupitz, R. et al. ., Nanotechnology 24, 035706 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehler, M. J., Atomistic Modeling of Materials Failure, Springer, New York (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, R. et al. ., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 285304 (2009).Google Scholar