Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:20:30.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Materials, Measurement, and Error: Comparative Class Data and Scientific Argumentation via a Cloud-based Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2014

Scott A. Sinex
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Prince George's Community College, Largo, MD 20774, USA
Theodore L. Chambers
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Prince George's Community College, Largo, MD 20774, USA
Joshua B. Halpern
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA
Get access

Abstract

The Next Generation Science Standards make scientific discourse a vital part of the classroom and arguing with evidence needs to become a common practice for students. Analysis and interpretation of data are an integral part as well. We present an approach using 21st-century technology combined with collection of laboratory data that is suitable for middle school through college. In an experiment using common nuts and bolts first semester chemistry students form six groups and determine a bolt mass indirectly. They collect mass data; then enter the data into an online form that compiles the data into a spreadsheet in Google Drive, a free cloud-based application. Once all the groups have submitted their data, they access the spreadsheet online and start an emulated online discussion in the laboratory as if the groups were globally dispersed using the chat feature available in Google Drive. Each group is identified by a group number having a unique group email address so there is a semi-anonymous sense among the members that allows for a fairly free discussion among students.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

National Research Council (NRC). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (2012), http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13165 (accessed January 2014).Google Scholar
Next Generation Science Standards , http://www.nextgenscience.org (accessed January 2014)Google Scholar
21st Century Skills and the Workplace: A 2013 Microsoft Partners in Learning and Pearson Foundation Study , http://www.gallup.com/strategicconsulting/162821/21st-century-skills-workplace.aspx (accessed January 2014).Google Scholar
Sinex, S.A. and Chambers, T.L., J. Chem. Educ. 90(9) 12441246 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinex, S.A., Chambers, T.L., and Halpern, J.B., Spreadsheets in Education 5 (1) Article 3 (2011).Google Scholar
Sinex, S.A., Chambers, T.L., and Halpern, J.B., Spreadsheets in Education 6 (1) Article 5 (2012).Google Scholar
Osborne, J., Science 328 463466 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedis-Grab, G., Science and Children 48(8) 4246 (2011).Google Scholar