Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:50:24.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Rapid Environmental Assessment of a Drainage Canal System to Identify Bioreference Sites for Wetland Permitting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Frank J. Dirrigl Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Texas–Pan American, Edinburg, Texas.
Guadalupe Medina Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Texas–Pan American, Edinburg, Texas.
Robert J. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Texas–Pan American, Edinburg, Texas.
*
Address correspondence to: Frank J. Dirrigl Jr., Department of Biology, University of Texas–Pan American, 1201 West University Drive, Edinburg, TX 78539-2999; (phone) 956-665-8732; (fax) 956-665-3657; (e-mail) dirriglf@utpa.edu.
Get access

Abstract

With budget and time constraints in environmental permitting, the collection of baseline water quality data relies on rapid environmental assessments (REAs). In south Texas, we investigated the usefulness of including physicochemical parameters and freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate and fish assemblage data to rapidly assess a drainage canal system. Data were converted to chemical averages and metrics, and sample sites meeting the greatest number of metric criteria for high water quality in south Texas were identified. The REA approach determined bioreference sites that could provide baseline data for wetland permitting, mitigation planning, and future comparisons. We demonstrate that the REA approach for drainage canals was useful and provided the necessary data for US Clean Water Act 401 and 404 environmental permitting and decision making for the Raymondville Drain Outfall Project.

Environmental Practice 16: 19–28 (2014)

Type
Features
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abate, T. 1992. Environmental Rapid-Assessment Programs Have Appeal and Critics. BioScience, 42(7):486489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.D., and Stribling, J.B. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 339 pp. Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/monitoring/rsl/bioassessment/.Google Scholar
Bournard, M., Cellot, B., Richoux, P., and Berrahou, A. 1996. Macroinvertebrate Community Structure and Environmental Characteristics along a Large River: Congruity of Patterns for Identification to Species or Family. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15(2):232253.Google Scholar
Canedo-Arguelles, M., Boix, C., Sanchez-Millaruelo, N., Sala, J., Caiola, N., Nebra, A., and Rieradevall, M. 2012. A Rapid Bioassessment Tool for the Evaluation of the Water Quality of Transitional Waters. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science, 111:129138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canton, S.P. 2006. Ecological Assessment of Aquatic Resources: Linking Science to Decision Making. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 25(1):264265.Google Scholar
Carletti, A.G., De Leo, A., and Farrari, I. 2004. A Critical Review of Representative Wetland Rapid Assessment Methods in North America. Aquatic Conservation, 14(Suppl. 1):S103S113.Google Scholar
Chessman, B.C. 1995. Rapid Assessment of Rivers Using Macroinvertebrates: A Procedure Based on Habitat-Specific Sampling, Family Level Identification and a Biotic Index. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20(1):122129.Google Scholar
Garcia, S.S., Ake, C., Clement, B., Huebner, J.J., Donnelly, K.C., and Shalat, S.L. 2001. Initial Results of Environmental Monitoring in the Texas Rio Grande Valley. Environmental International 26(7–8):465474.Google Scholar
Greenwood-Smith, S.L. 2002. The Use of Rapid Environmental Assessment Techniques to Monitor the Health of Australian Rivers. Water Science & Technolology 45(11):155160.Google Scholar
Gunatilaka, A. 1975. Some Aspects of the Biology and Sedimentology of Laminated Algal Mats from Mannar Lagoon, Northwest Ceylon. Sedimentary Geology 14(4):275300.Google Scholar
Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1977. Use of Arthropods to Evaluate Water Quality of Streams, Techincal Bulletin 100. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resouces, Madison, 15 pp. Available at http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/EcoNatRes/EcoNatRes-idx?id=EcoNatRes.DNRBull100.Google Scholar
Karr, J.R., Fausch, K.D., Angermeier, P.L., Yant, P.R., and Schlosser, I.J. 1986, September. Assessment of Biological Integrity in Running Waters: A Method and Its Rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 5. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, 28 pp. Available at http://limnoreferences.missouristate.edu/assets/limnoreferences/Karr_et_al._1986.pdf.Google Scholar
Leigh, E., and Fipps, G. 2003, February 5. Demonstration of the Rapid Assessment Tool: Analysis of Canal Conditions in Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 1. Texas A&M University, College Station, 18 pp. Available at http://idea.tamu.edu/documents/2003/tr333.pdf.Google Scholar
Lenat, D.R., and Barbour, M.T. 1994. Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community Structure for Rapid, Cost-Effective, Water Quality Monitoring: Rapid Bioassessment. In Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Ecosystems, S.L. Loeb and A. Spacie, eds. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 187215.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1992, April 6. Using the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) to Measure Environmental Quality in Warmwater Streams in Wisconsin, General Technical Report NC-149. North Carolina Forest Experimental Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, St. Paul, MN, 48 pp. Available at http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/10213.Google Scholar
Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 192 pp.Google Scholar
Maloney, K.O., Weller, D.E., Russell, M.J., and Hothorn, T. 2009. Classifying the Biological Condition of Small Streams: An Example Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 28(4):869884.Google Scholar
Merritt, R.W., Cummings, K. and Berg, M., eds. 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, IA, 1,158 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, R.E., and Gunsalus, B.E. 1997, September. Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), Technical Publication REG-001. South Florida Water Management District, Natural Resource Management Division, West Palm Beach, FL, 84 pp. Available at http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/xrepository/sfwmd_repository_pdf/wrap99.pdf.Google Scholar
Oliver, I., and Beattie, A.J. 1993. A Possible Method for the Rapid Assessment of Biodivesity. Conservation Biology, 7(3):562568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plafkin, J.L., Barbour, M.T., Porter, K.D., Gross, S.K., and Hughes, R.M. 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, EPA 440-4-89-001. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/monitoring/rsl/bioassessment/.Google Scholar
Resh, V.H. 1995. Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Rapid Bioassessment Procedures for Water Quality Monitoring in Developing and Newly Industrialized Countries. In Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon, eds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 167177.Google Scholar
Resh, V.H., Norris, R.H., and Barbour, M.T. 1995. Design and Implementation of Rapid Assessment Approaches for Water Resource Monitoring Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20(1):108121.Google Scholar
Robertson, S.M., and Gamble, L.R. 1991, December. Contaminants Investigation of Irrigation Drainwater in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas, 1990, R2-90-2-102. US Fish & Wildlife Service, Corpus Christi, TX, 10 pp. Available at http://library.fws.gov/Pubs2/ci/lowerriogrande_irrigation.pdf?id=12.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D.M., and Resh, V.H. 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York, 504 pp.Google Scholar
Ruse, L.P. 1998. A Biological Key to Canal Water Quality. Water and Environment Journal, 12(3):191196.Google Scholar
Scheren, P.A.G.M., Zanting, H.A., and Lemmens, A.M.C. 2000. Estimation of Water Polluton Sources in Lake Victoria, East Africa: Application and Elaboration of the Rapid Assessment Methodology. Journal of Environmental Management, 58(4):235248.Google Scholar
Stein, E.D., and Ambrose, R.F. 1998. A Rapid Impact Assessment Method for Use in a Regulatory Context. Wetlands 18(3):379392.Google Scholar
Sutula, M.A., Stein, E.D., Collins, J.N., and Fetscher, A.E. 2006. A Practical Guide for the Development of a Wetland Assessment Method: The California Experience. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42(1):157175.Google Scholar
Texas Commision on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). 2007), June. Surface Water Quality Monitoring Procedures, Volume 2: Methods for Collecting and Analyzing Biological Assemblage and Habitat Data, RG-416. Water Quality Planning Division, TCEQ, Austin, 202 pp. Available at http://www.tceq.texas.gov/waterquality/monitoring/swqm_procedures.html.Google Scholar
Texas Commision on Enviornmental Quality (TCEQ). 2012, August. Surface Water Quality Monitoring Procedures, Volume 1: Physical and Chemical Monitoring Methods for Water, Sediment, and Tissue, RG-415. Water Quality Planning Division, TCEQ, Austin, 202 pp. Available at http://www.tceq.texas.gov/waterquality/monitoring/swqm_procedures.html.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R.A., Camilleri, C., and Finlayson, C.M. 1998. The Potential of Rapid Assessment Techniques as Early Warning Indicators of Wetland Degradation: A Review. Environmental Toxicology and Water Quality, 13(4):297312.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, F.C., Jackson, G.A., and Rogers, W.J. 1988. Reconnaissance Investigation of Water Quality, Bottom Sediment, and Biota Associated with Irrigation Drainage in the Lower Rio Grande Valley and Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, Texas, 1986–87. Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4277. US Geological Survey, Austin, TX, 90 pp. Available at http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Documents/R2ES/Reconnaissance86.pdf.Google Scholar